This patch renames the LoopInfo::isRotated() method to LoopInfo::isRotatedForm()
to make it clear that the method checks whether the loop is in rotated form, not
whether the loop has been rotated by the LoopRotation pass.
Summary:
This patch adds a method to determine if a loop is in rotated form (the latch is
an exiting block). It also modifies the getLoopGuardBranch method to use this
new method. This method can also be used in Loopfusion. Once this patch lands I
will make the corresponding changes there.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, etiotto, Whitney, fhahn, hfinkel
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65958
Summary: The assertion in getLoopGuardBranch can be a 'return nullptr'
under if condition.
Authored By: DTharun
Reviewer: Whitney, fhahn
Reviewed By: Whitney, fhahn
Subscribers: fhahn, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66084
llvm-svn: 373857
Summary: As discussed in the loop group meeting. With the current
definition of loop guard, we should not allow multiple loop exiting
blocks. For loops that has multiple loop exiting blocks, we can simply
unable to find the loop guard.
When getUniqueExitBlock() obtains a vector size not equals to one, that
means there is either no exit blocks or there exists more than one
unique block the loop exit to.
If we don't disallow loop with multiple loop exit blocks, then with our
current implementation, there can exist exit blocks don't post dominated
by the non pre-header successor of the guard block.
Reviewer: reames, Meinersbur, kbarton, etiotto, bmahjour
Reviewed By: Meinersbur, kbarton
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66529
llvm-svn: 373011
Summary:
This is the first patch for the loop guard. We introduced
getLoopGuardBranch() and isGuarded().
This currently only works on simplified loop, as it requires a preheader
and a latch to identify the guard.
It will work on loops of the form:
/// GuardBB:
/// br cond1, Preheader, ExitSucc <== GuardBranch
/// Preheader:
/// br Header
/// Header:
/// ...
/// br Latch
/// Latch:
/// br cond2, Header, ExitBlock
/// ExitBlock:
/// br ExitSucc
/// ExitSucc:
Prior discussions leading upto the decision to introduce the loop guard
API: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-May/132607.html
Reviewer: reames, kbarton, hfinkel, jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: wuzish, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits, bmahjour, etiotto
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63885
llvm-svn: 367033
It is possible that exit block has two predecessors and one of them is a latch
block while another is not.
Current algorithm is based on the assumption that all exits are dedicated
and therefore we can check only first predecessor of loop exit to find all unique
exits.
However if we do not consider latch block and it is first predecessor of some
exit then this exit will be found.
Regression test is added.
As a side effect of algorithm re-writing, the restriction that all exits are dedicated
is eliminated.
Reviewers: reames, fhahn, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64787
llvm-svn: 366294
Extract the code from LoopUnrollRuntime into utility function to
re-use it in D63923.
Reviewers: reames, mkuper
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, zzheng, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64548
llvm-svn: 366040
Summary:
This PR extends the loop object with more utilities to get loop bounds, step, induction variable, and guard branch. There already exists passes which try to obtain the loop induction variable in their own pass, e.g. loop interchange. It would be useful to have a common area to get these information. Moreover, loop fusion (https://reviews.llvm.org/D55851) is planning to use getGuard() to extend the kind of loops it is able to fuse, e.g. rotated loop with non-constant upper bound, which would have a loop guard.
/// Example:
/// for (int i = lb; i < ub; i+=step)
/// <loop body>
/// --- pseudo LLVMIR ---
/// beforeloop:
/// guardcmp = (lb < ub)
/// if (guardcmp) goto preheader; else goto afterloop
/// preheader:
/// loop:
/// i1 = phi[{lb, preheader}, {i2, latch}]
/// <loop body>
/// i2 = i1 + step
/// latch:
/// cmp = (i2 < ub)
/// if (cmp) goto loop
/// exit:
/// afterloop:
///
/// getBounds
/// getInitialIVValue --> lb
/// getStepInst --> i2 = i1 + step
/// getStepValue --> step
/// getFinalIVValue --> ub
/// getCanonicalPredicate --> '<'
/// getDirection --> Increasing
/// getGuard --> if (guardcmp) goto loop; else goto afterloop
/// getInductionVariable --> i1
/// getAuxiliaryInductionVariable --> {i1}
/// isCanonical --> false
Committed on behalf of @Whitney (Whitney Tsang).
Reviewers: kbarton, hfinkel, dmgreen, Meinersbur, jdoerfert, syzaara, fhahn
Reviewed By: kbarton
Subscribers: tvvikram, bmahjour, etiotto, fhahn, jsji, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60565
llvm-svn: 361517
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The previous implementation traversed all loop blocks and bailed if one
was not a latch block. Since we are only interested in latch blocks, we
should only traverse those.
llvm-svn: 341926
loops in a function.
These are relatively confusing to talk about and compute correctly so it
seems really good to write down their implementation in one place. I've
replaced one place we needed this in the loop PM infrastructure and
I have another place in a pending patch that wants it.
We can't quite use this for the core loop PM walk because there we're
sometimes working on a sub-forest.
I'll add the expected unittests before committing this but wanted to
make sure folks were happy with these names / comments.
Credit goes to Richard Smith for the idea for naming the order where siblings
are in reverse program order but the tree traversal remains preorder.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28932
llvm-svn: 292569
other test cases.
Summary: Refactor out LoopInfo computation so that it can be
used by other test cases.
So i am changing this test proactively for later commit, which will use
this function.
Reviewers: sanjoy, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28778
llvm-svn: 292250
Summary:
Use getLoopLatch in place of isLoopSimplifyForm. we do not need
to know whether the loop has a preheader nor dedicated exits.
Reviewers: hfinkel, sanjoy, atrick, mkuper
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28724
llvm-svn: 292078
Kit Barton