The `intrinsics_gen` target exists in the CMake exports since r309389
(see LLVMConfig.cmake.in), hence projects can depend on `intrinsics_gen`
even it they are built separately from LLVM.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83454
Summary:
IRDynamicChecks in its current form is specific to Clang since it deals
with the C language family. It is possible that we may want to
instrument code generated for other languages, but we can factor in a
more general mechanism to do so at a later time.
This decouples ObCLanguageRuntime from Expression!
Reviewers: compnerd, clayborg, jingham, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64591
llvm-svn: 365853
lldbExpression was linking against lldbPluginExpressionParserClang, and
lldbPluginExpressionParserClang was linking against lldbExpression.
There's no reason lldbExpression should need anything from
lldbPluginExpressionParserClang, so let's remove that dependency.
llvm-svn: 360208
The only reason this was here was so that Module could have a
function called CreateJITModule which created things in a special
order. Instead of making this specific to creating JIT modules,
I converted this into a template function that can create a module
for any type of object file plugin and just forwards arguments
through. Since the template is not instantiated in Core, the linker
(and header file) dependency moves to the point where it is
instantiated, which only happens in Expression. Conceptually, this
location also makes more sense for a dependency on ObjectFileJIT.
After all, we JIT expressions so it's no surprise that Expression
needs to make use of ObjectFileJIT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47228
llvm-svn: 333143
Summary:
This patch adds accurate dependency specifications to the mail LLDB libraries and tools.
In all cases except lldb-server, these dependencies are added in addition to existing dependencies (making this low risk), and I performed some code cleanup along the way.
For lldb-server I've cleaned up the LLVM dependencies down to just the minimum actually required. This is more than lldb-server actually directly references, and I've left a todo in the code to clean that up.
Reviewers: labath, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits, danalbert, srhines, ki.stfu, mgorny, jgosnell
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29333
llvm-svn: 293686
This patch updates a bunch of places where add_dependencies was being explicitly called to add dependencies on intrinsics_gen to instead use the DEPENDS named parameter. This cleanup is needed for a patch I'm working on to add a dependency debugging mode to the build system.
llvm-svn: 287408
IRExecutionUnit.h includes Module.h, which through a long chain of includes eventually includes Attributes.gen.
This fixes a build issue reported to lldb-dev by Hal. Thanks Hal!
llvm-svn: 282803
We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating
expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all
errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave
all of them.
To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which
contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression
is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as
to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the
errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors
to the user.
This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to
thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I
also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing
newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead
pass the Severity flag.
The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the
MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously
printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase.
<rdar://problem/22864976>
llvm-svn: 263859
The Go interpreter doesn't JIT or use LLVM, so this also
moves all the JIT related code from UserExpression to a new class LLVMUserExpression.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13073
Fix merge
llvm-svn: 251820
There are still a bunch of dependencies on the plug-in, but this helps to
identify them.
There are also a few more bits we need to move (and abstract, for example the
ClangPersistentVariables).
llvm-svn: 248612
Before we had:
ClangFunction
ClangUtilityFunction
ClangUserExpression
and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression
base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds:
FunctionCaller
UtilityFunction
UserExpression
You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage.
The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches
the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it.
Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way,
I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper
that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types.
Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs.
The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller
to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a
FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions.
Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common
JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency
but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary.
llvm-svn: 247720
Summary:
This doesn't exist in other LLVM projects any longer and doesn't
do anything.
Reviewers: chaoren, labath
Subscribers: emaste, tberghammer, lldb-commits, danalbert
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12586
llvm-svn: 246749
- generate-vers.pl has to be called by cmake to generate the version number
- parallel builds not yet supported; dependency on clang must be explicitly specified
Tested on Linux.
- Building on Mac will require code-signing logic to be implemented.
- Building on Windows will require OS-detection logic and some selective directory inclusion
Thanks to Carlo Kok (who originally prepared these CMakefiles for Windows) and Ben Langmuir
who ported them to Linux!
llvm-svn: 175795
Michele Scandale