I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
While we can usually replace bitcast like instructions
(MachineInstr::isBitcast()) with a COPY this is not legal if any of the
users uses SUBREG_TO_REG to assert the upper bits of the result are
zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28474
llvm-svn: 291483
Specifically avoid implicit conversions from/to integral types to
avoid potential errors when changing the underlying type. For example,
a typical initialization of a "full" mask was "LaneMask = ~0u", which
would result in a value of 0x00000000FFFFFFFF if the type was extended
to uint64_t.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27454
llvm-svn: 289820
The general idea here is to get enough of the existing restrictions out of the way that the already existing folding logic in foldMemoryOperand can kick in for STATEPOINTs and fold references to immutable stack slots. The key changes are:
Support for folding multiple operands at once which reference the same load
Support for folding multiple loads into a single instruction
Walk all the operands of the instruction for varidic instructions (this is a bug fix!)
Once this lands, I'll post another patch which refactors the TII interface here. There's nothing actually x86 specific about the x86 code used here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24103
llvm-svn: 289510
This is mostly a mechanical change to make TargetInstrInfo API take
MachineInstr& (instead of MachineInstr* or MachineBasicBlock::iterator)
when the argument is expected to be a valid MachineInstr. This is a
general API improvement.
Although it would be possible to do this one function at a time, that
would demand a quadratic amount of churn since many of these functions
call each other. Instead I've done everything as a block and just
updated what was necessary.
This is mostly mechanical fixes: adding and removing `*` and `&`
operators. The only non-mechanical change is to split
ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatencyImpl out from
ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatency. Previously, the latter took a
`MachineInstr*` which it updated to the instruction bundle leader; now,
the latter calls the former either with the same `MachineInstr&` or the
bundle leader.
As a side effect, this removes a bunch of MachineInstr* to
MachineBasicBlock::iterator implicit conversions, a necessary step
toward fixing PR26753.
Note: I updated WebAssembly, Lanai, and AVR (despite being
off-by-default) since it turned out to be easy. I couldn't run tests
for AVR since llc doesn't link with it turned on.
llvm-svn: 274189
The original commit was reverted because of a buildbot problem with LazyCallGraph::SCC handling (not related to the OptBisect handling).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267231
This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.
The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.
The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267022
Target-specific instructions may have uninteresting physreg clobbers,
for target-specific reasons. The peephole pass doesn't need to concern
itself with such defs, as long as they're implicit and marked as dead.
llvm-svn: 255182
Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through
virtual registers such as:
%vreg = COPY %PHYSREG
...
%PHYSREG = COPY %vreg
There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the
later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows
us to remove the initial copy.
This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build
of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses
libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live
at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself
enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's
never restored and the comparison results are both live.
Before this patch we have:
DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def>
%vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1
%EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1
JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use>
Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in
a generic manner.
dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub.
I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only
remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because
the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't
properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator
anyways.
The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable
registers:
CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll
CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll
CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll
CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll
CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll
CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll
CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll
CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll
CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll
This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency
breakage and x87 FP stack.
Note that all other backends' tests pass.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157
llvm-svn: 254665
If a virtual register is copied and another copy was already
seen, replace with the previous copy. This only handles the
simplest cases for now.
This pattern shows up from various operand restrictions
AMDGPU has which require inserting copies depending
on the register class of the operands.
llvm-svn: 248611
Allow a target to do something other than search for copies
that will avoid cross register bank copies.
Implement for SI by only rewriting the most basic copies,
so it should look through anything like a subregister extract.
I'm not entirely satisified with this because it seems like
eliminating a reg_sequence that isn't fully used should work
generically for all targets without them having to override
something. However, it seems to be tricky to have a simple
implementation of this without rewriting to invalid kinds
of subregister copies on some targets.
I'm not sure if there is currently a generic way to easily check
if a subregister index would be valid for the current use.
The current set of TargetRegisterInfo::get*Class functions don't
quite behave like I would expect (e.g. getSubClassWithSubReg
returns the maximal register class rather than the minimal), so
I'm not sure how to make the generic test keep searching if
SrcRC:SrcSubReg is a valid replacement for DefRC:DefSubReg. Making
the default implementation to check for simple copies breaks
a variety of ARM and x86 tests by producing illegal subregister uses.
The ARM tests are not actually changed since it should still be using
the same sharesSameRegisterFile implementation, this just relaxes
them to not check for specific registers.
llvm-svn: 248478
Reintroduce r245442. Remove an overly conservative assertion introduced
in r245442. We could replace the assertion to use `shareSameRegisterFile`
instead, but in that point in `insertPHI` we already lost the original
Def subreg to check against. So drop the assertion completely.
Original commit message:
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 245479
Reapply r243486.
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 245442
This abstracts away the test for "when can we fold across a MachineInstruction"
into the the MI interface, and changes call-frame optimization use the same test
the peephole optimizer users.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11945
llvm-svn: 244729
The condition for clearing the folding candidate list was clamped together
with the "uninteresting instruction" condition. This is too conservative,
e.g. we don't need to clear the list when encountering an IMPLICIT_DEF.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11591
llvm-svn: 244577
Reapply 243271 with more fixes; although we are not handling multiple
sources with coalescable copies, we were not properly skipping this
case.
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 243486
Reapply r242295 with fixes in the implementation.
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 243271
Reapply r242294.
- Create a new CopyRewriter for Uncoalescable copy-like instructions
- Change the ValueTracker to return a ValueTrackerResult
This makes optimizeUncoalescable looks more like optimizeCoalescable and
use the CopyRewritter infrastructure.
This is also the preparation for looking up into PHI nodes in the
ValueTracker.
rdar://problem/20404526
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11195
llvm-svn: 242940
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 242295
- Create a new CopyRewriter for Uncoalescable copy-like instructions
- Change the ValueTracker to return a ValueTrackerResult
This makes optimizeUncoalescable looks more like optimizeCoalescable and
use the CopyRewritter infrastructure.
This is also the preparation for looking up into PHI nodes in the
ValueTracker.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11195
llvm-svn: 242294
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
All of the cases were just appending from random access iterators to a
vector. Using insert/append can grow the vector to the perfect size
directly and moves the growing out of the loop. No intended functionalty
change.
llvm-svn: 230845
Peephole optimizer is scanning a basic block forward. At some point it
needs to answer the question "given a pointer to an MI in the current
BB, is it located before or after the current instruction".
To perform this, it keeps a set of the MIs already seen during the scan,
if a MI is not in the set, it is assumed to be after.
It means that newly created MIs have to be inserted in the set as well.
This commit passes the set as an argument to the target-dependent
optimizeSelect() so that it can properly update the set with the
(potentially) newly created MIs.
llvm-svn: 225772
Peephole optimization that generates a single conditional branch
for csinc-branch sequences like in the examples below. This is
possible when the csinc sets or clears a register based on a condition
code and the branch checks that register. Also the condition
code may not be modified between the csinc and the original branch.
Examples:
1. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>;tbnz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<invCC>
2. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>; tbz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<CC>
rdar://problem/18506500
llvm-svn: 219742
and TargetRegisterInfo in the peephole optimizer. This
makes it easier to grab subtarget dependent variables off
of the MachineFunction rather than the TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 219669
The advanced copy optimization does not yield any difference on the whole llvm
test-suite + SPECs, either in compile time or runtime (binaries are identical),
but has a big potential when data go back and forth between register files as
demonstrated with test/CodeGen/ARM/adv-copy-opt.ll.
Note: This was measured for both Os and O3 for armv7s, arm64, and x86_64.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216236
Eugene Zelenko