LLDB relies on empty FileSpecs being invalid files, for example, they
don't exists. Currently this assumption does not always hold during
reproducer replay, because we pass the result of GetPath to the VFS.
This is an empty string, which the VFS converts to an absolute directory
by prepending the current working directory, before looking it up in the
YAML mapping. This means that an empty FileSpec will exist when the
current working directory does. This breaks at least one test
(TestAddDsymCommand.py) when ran from replay.
This patch special cases empty FileSpecs and returns a sensible result
before calling GetPath and forwarding the call.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77351
This reimplements Symbols::FindSymbolFileInBundle to use the VFS-aware
recursive directory iterator. This is needed for reproducer replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77337
This new test format is simpler and more flexible. It creates Lit ShTests
on the fly that reuse existing substitutions (like %{cxx}) instead of
having complex logic in Python to run the tests. This has the benefit
that virtually no coding is required to customize how the test suite is
run -- one can achieve pretty much anything by defining the appropriate
substitutions in a simple lit.cfg file.
For example, in order to run the tests on an embedded device after
building with a specific SDK, one can set the %{cxx} and %{compile_flags}
substitutions to use that SDK, and the %{exec} substitution to the ssh.py
script currently used for .sh.cpp tests with a remote executor. Dealing with
the SSHExecutor becomes unnecessary, since all tests are treated like ShTests.
As a side effect of this design, configuration files for the test
suite can be as simple as:
config.substitutions.append(('%{cxx}', '<path-to-compiler>'))
config.substitutions.append(('%{compile_flags}', '<flags>'))
config.substitutions.append(('%{link_flags}', '<flags>'))
config.substitutions.append(('%{exec}', '<script-to-execute>'))
This should allow storing lit.cfg files for various configurations
directly in the repository instead of relying on complicated logic
in config.py to set up the right flags. I've found numerous problems
in that logic in the past years, and it seems like having simple and
explicit configuration files for the configurations we support is
going to solve most of these problems. Specifically, I am hoping to
store configuration files for testing other Standard Libraries in
the repository.
Improving the interaction with the test suite configuration is still a
work in progress, so for now this test format reuses the substitutions and
available features that are set up by the current config.py.
This new test format should support pretty much everything that the current
test format supports, however it will not be enabled by default at first to
make sure we're satisfied with it. For a short period of time, the new format
will require `--param=use_new_format=True` to be enabled, however it is a very
short term goal to replace the current testing format entirely and to simplify
the configuration accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77338
Summary:
This matches llvm::VectorType.
It moves the size from the type bitfield into VectorType, increasing size by 8
bytes (including padding of 4). This is OK as we don't expect to create terribly
many of these types.
c.f. D77313 which enables large power-of-two sizes without growing VectorType.
Reviewers: efriedma, hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77335
Summary:
MSan not implementing COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_NOTHING_IS_INITIALIZED looks
like an omission - this macro makes it possible for those intercepted
functions, which libc needs very early, to work before interceptors are
initialized (i.e. before REAL() is usable).
While currently there are no observable practical problems in this
area, changes in libc or in MSan runtime may provoke them. Therefore,
change MSan to work like ASan and TSan already do - use internal
functions in certain interceptors when initialization is not complete.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76969
This test regressed with 5ade17e0ca, but we never noticed it because
.pass.mm tests were skipped due to a bug in our Lit config. This commit
fixes is_pointer (by essentially reverting tha part of 5ade17e0ca) and
also adds .pass.mm tests to the list of supported test suffixes.
We can explore how to support __is_pointer with Objective-C++ qualifiers
as a follow-up -- the main goal of this commit is to fix the regression
quickly and make sure all tests of the suite are run.
A PC-relative relocation referencing a non-preemptible absolute symbol
(due to STT_TLS) is not representable in -pie/-shared mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77021
Summary:
For current architect, we always require setContainingCsect to be
called on every MCSymbol got used in XCOFF context.
This is very hard to achieve because symbols gets created everywhere
and other MCSymbol types(ELF, COFF) do not have similar rules.
It's very easy to miss setting the containing csect, and we would
need to add a lot of XCOFF specialized code around some common code area.
This patch intendeds to do
1. Rely on getFragment().getParent() to get csect from labels.
2. Only use get/setRepresentedCsect (was get/setContainingCsect)
if symbol itself represents a csect.
Reviewers: DiggerLin, hubert.reinterpretcast, daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77080
1. It's redundant to explicitly check that string does not contain `PAUSE_MM`
token if check that the `PAUSE` token is followed by an angle bracket.
2. The removed `CHECK-NOT` directives do not have trailing colons.
Summary:
C++ defines a number of keywords that are regular identifiers in
JavaScript, e.g. `concept`:
const concept = 1; // legit JS
This change expands the existing `IsJavaScriptIdentifier(Tok)` function
to return false for C++ keywords that aren't keywords in JS.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: jfb, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77311
In the near future llvm-mc will resolve the fixups that generate
R_ARM_THUMB_PC8 and R_ARM_THUMB_PC12 at assembly time (see comments in
D72892), and forbid inter-section references. Change the LLD tests for
these relocations to use .inst and .reloc to avoid LLD tests failing when
this happens. The tests generate the same instructions, relocations
and symbols.
I will need to make equivalent changes for D75349 Arm equivalent
relocations, but this is still in review so these don't need changing
before llvm-mc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77200
Summary: I think it would be better to require the alignment to be >= 1. It is currently confusing to allow both values.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77372
This pass replaces each indirect call/jump with a direct call to a thunk that looks like:
lfence
jmpq *%r11
This ensures that if the value in register %r11 was loaded from memory, then
the value in %r11 is (architecturally) correct prior to the jump.
Also adds a new target feature to X86: +lvi-cfi
("cfi" meaning control-flow integrity)
The feature can be added via clang CLI using -mlvi-cfi.
This is an alternate implementation to https://reviews.llvm.org/D75934 That merges the thunk insertion functionality with the existing X86 retpoline code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76812
The old name was a bit misleading because the functions actually return
contributions to the corresponding sections.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77302
Summary:
This patch adds parsing and dumping DWARFv5 .debug_macro section in llvm-dwarfdump,
it does not introduce any new switch. Existing switch "--debug-macro"
should be used to dump macinfo or macro section.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, ikudrin, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73086
isGCValue should detect whether the deopt value is a GC pointer.
Currently it checks by finding the value in SI.Bases and SI.Ptrs.
However these data structures contain only those values which
have corresponding gc.relocate call. So we can miss GC value if it
does not have gc.relocate call (dead after the call).
Check GC strategy whether pointer is GC one or consider any pointer
to be GC one conservatively.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77130
John Brawn