I noticed the wrong text was being replaced with the correction while
working on expanding the "namespace-aware" typo correction to include
classes.
llvm-svn: 191450
Unlike with namespaces, searching inside of classes requires also
checking the access to correction candidates (i.e. don't suggest a
correction to a private class member for a correction occurring outside
that class and its methods or friends).
Included is a small (one line) fix for a bug, that was uncovered while
cleaning up the unit tests, where the decls from a TypoCorrection candidate
were preserved in new TypoCorrection candidates that are derived (copied)
from the old TypoCorrection--notably when creating a new candidate by
changing the NestedNameSpecifier associated with the base idenitifer.
llvm-svn: 191449
This fixes a couple of latent crashes for invalid attributes and also adds a
fixit hint to turn identifiers into string literals if one was expected. It then
proceeds recovery as if the identifier was a literal. Diagnostic locations are
also changed to point at the literal instead of the attribute if the error
concerns the argument. PR17175.
For example:
hidden.c:1:40: error: 'visibility' attribute requires a string
extern int x __attribute__((visibility(hidden)));
^
" "
hidden.c:2:29: error: visibility does not match previous declaration
extern int x __attribute__((visibility("default")));
^
hidden.c:1:29: note: previous attribute is here
extern int x __attribute__((visibility(hidden)));
^
llvm-svn: 190699
It'd be another issue that the terminal and stdout(including redirects) with utf8. This test XPASSed on Win32, at least on Lit.
FYI, we don't use a triplet like "-win64" anywhere.
llvm-svn: 190559
Summary:
This test only works on systems capable of outputting UTF-8 encoded
text on the standard output (tested on linux and OS X, should XFAIL on windows,
if I haven't messed up the XFAIL line).
Reviewers: jordan_rose
Reviewed By: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1607
llvm-svn: 190537
of local classes. We were previously handling this by performing qualified
lookup within a function declaration(!!); replace it with the proper scope
lookup.
llvm-svn: 188050
recovery is not attempted with the fixit. Also move the associated test
case from FixIt/fixit.cpp to SemaCXX/member-expr.cpp since the fixit is
no longer automatically applied.
llvm-svn: 186342
followed by an identifier, then diagnose an identifier as being a bogus part of
the declarator instead of tripping over it. Improves diagnostics for cases like
std::vector<const int *p> my_vec;
llvm-svn: 186061
Combined with typo correction's new ability to apply global/absolute nested
name specifiers to possible corrections, cases such as in PR12287 where the
desired function is being shadowed by a lexically closer function with the
same name but a different number of parameters will now include a FixIt.
On a side note, since the test for this change caused
test/SemaCXX/typo-correction.cpp to exceed the typo correction limit for
a single file, I've included a test case for exceeding the limit and added
some comments to both the original and part two of typo-correction.cpp
warning future editors of the files about the limit.
llvm-svn: 185881
The removal is tried by retrying the failed lookup of a correction
candidate with either the MemberContext or SS (CXXScopeSpecifier) or
both set to NULL if they weren't already. If the candidate identifier
is then looked up successfully, make a note in the candidate that the
SourceRange should include any existing nested name specifier even if
the candidate isn't adding a different one (i.e. the candidate has a
NULL NestedNameSpecifier).
Also tweak the diagnostic messages to differentiate between a suggestion
that just replaces the identifer but leaves the existing nested name
specifier intact and one that replaces the entire qualified identifier,
in cases where the suggested replacement is unqualified.
llvm-svn: 185487
CorrectTypo will now see and consider those corrections that are effectively
shadowed by other declarations in a closer context when resolved via an
unqualified lookup. This involves adding any parent namespaces to the set of
namespaces as fully-qualified name specifiers, and also adding potential
corrections that passed name lookup but were rejected by the given
CorrectionCandidateCallback into the set of failed corrections that should be
tried with the set of namespace specifiers.
llvm-svn: 185486
in addition of receiver having static type, but also when
receiver has dynamic type (of 'id' variety) as well as when
receiver is of 'Class' type vareity. // rdar://7853549
llvm-svn: 184195
- 'register' storage class
- dynamic exception specifications
Only the former check is enabled by default for now (the latter might be quite noisy).
llvm-svn: 183881
C++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning for
code relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-written
tests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing our
implementation of this rule.
llvm-svn: 179969
'long' and 'long long' are different for the purposes of mangling.
This caused <rdar://problem/13254874>.
This reverts commit c2f994d31ec85e9af811af38eb1b28709aef0b2c.
llvm-svn: 175681
which allows grouping parens in an abstract-pack-declarator. This was already
mostly implemented, but missed some cases. Add an ExtWarn for use of this
extension until CWG ratifies it.
llvm-svn: 175660
attributes yet, so just issue the appropriate diagnostics. Also generalize the
fixit for attributes-in-the-wrong-place code and reuse it here, if attributes
are placed after the access-specifier or 'virtual' in a base specifier.
llvm-svn: 175575
If the member has an initializer, assume it was probably intended to be static
and suggest/recover with that.
If the member doesn't have an initializer, assume it was probably intended to
be const instead of constexpr and suggest that.
(if the attempt to apply these changes fails, don't make any suggestion &
produce the same diagnostic experience as before. The only case where this can
come up that I know of is with a mutable constexpr with an initializer, since
mutable is incompatible with static (but it's already incompatible with
const anyway))
llvm-svn: 173873
Dmitri Gribenko