template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
for (InputFile *F : Files)
Symtab->addFile<ELFT>(F); // if there is a duplicate symbol error
...
Target = getTarget();
When parsing .debug_info in the object file (for better diagnostics),
DWARF.cpp findAux may dereference the null pointer Target
auto *DR = dyn_cast<Defined>(&File->getRelocTargetSym(Rel));
if (!DR) {
// Broken debug info may point to a non-defined symbol,
// some asan object files may also contain R_X86_64_NONE
RelType Type = Rel.getType(Config->IsMips64EL);
if (Type != Target->NoneRel) /// Target is null
Move the assignment of Target to an earlier place to fix this.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61712
llvm-svn: 360305
The script phase to do Options.td -> Options.inc was
wrong (missing the "include" directory) so the rule didn't
get run when Options.td changed.
llvm-svn: 360304
This patch allows for expansion of ADDCARRY and SUBCARRY when the target does not support it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61411
llvm-svn: 360303
as it was causing significant compile time regressions.
This reverts commit r359426 while we come up with testcases and additional ideas.
llvm-svn: 360301
This patch provides workaround to allow gfortran to compile the
OpenMP Fortran modules.
From the gfortran manual:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.1.0/gfortran/BOZ-literal-constants.html
"Note that initializing an INTEGER variable with a statement such as
DATA i/Z'FFFFFFFF'/ will give an integer overflow error rather than the desired
result of -1 when i is a 32-bit integer on a system that supports 64-bit
integers. The -fno-range-check option can be used as a workaround for legacy
code that initializes integers in this manner."
Bug filed: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41755
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61603
llvm-svn: 360299
I think the recent change to flush the SB API recording uncovered a real
issue on the Windows bot. Although I couldn't make much sense of the
error message "unknown file: error: SEH exception with code 0x3221225477
thrown in the test body.", it prompted me to look at the test. In the
unit test we were recording during replay, which is obviously not
correct. I think we didn't see this issue before because we flushed once
after the recording was done. This patch unsets the recording logic
during the replay part of the test.
Hopefully this fixed the Windows bot.
llvm-svn: 360298
This is extracted from the original draft of D61419 with some additional tests.
We don't currently get this in IR (it's conservatively turned into a NaN),
but presumably that'll get updated as we add real IR support for 'fneg'
rather than 'fsub -0.0, x'.
The x86-32 run shows the following, and I haven't looked further to see why,
but that seems to be independent:
Legalizing: t1: f32 = undef
Trying to expand node
Creating fp constant: t4: f32 = ConstantFP<0.000000e+00>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61516
llvm-svn: 360296
Summary:
When using lld-link to build static libraries containing object files
with module assembly, the program would crash with "Assertion `T &&
T->hasMCAsmParser()' failed". This change causes the code in lld-link
that initialized Targets, TargetInfos, and AsmParsers (which already
existed) to be run before entering the lib building path (which needs
it). This avoids the error (and is what llvm-lib and llvm-ar do, too).
Fixes PR41803.
Reviewers: ruiu, rnk, hans
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61699
llvm-svn: 360295
The VOP3 form should always be the preferred selection, to be shrunk
later. This should only be an optimization issue, but this partially
works around a problem from clobbering VCC when SIFixSGPRCopies
rewrites an SCC defining operation directly to VCC.
3 of the testcases are regressions from failing to fold the immediate
in cases it should. These can be avoided by improving the VCC liveness
handling in SIFoldOperands. Simply increasing the threshold to
computeRegisterLiveness works, although this is common enough that VCC
liveness should probably be tracked throughout the pass. The hack of
leaving behind an implicit_def instruction to avoid breaking iterator
wastes instruction count, which inhibits finding the VCC def in long
chains of adds. Doing this however exposes different, worse looking
regressions from poor scheduling behavior. This could probably be
avoided around by forcing the shrink of the addc here, but the
scheduler should probably be fixed.
The r600 add test needs to be split out because it asserts on the
arguments in the new test during the calling convention lowering.
llvm-svn: 360293
Previous ArchSpec tests didn't catch this bug since we never tested just the OS being out of date. Fixed the bug and covered this with a test that would catch this.
This was found when trying to load a core file where the core file was an ELF file with just the e_machine for architeture and where the ELF header had no OS set in the OSABI field of the e_ident. It wasn't merging the architecture with the target architecture correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61659
llvm-svn: 360292
This reverts r360271 (git commit a0933bd8ec)
There are concerns on the review that this breaks EFI builds and that
the transitive includes (sal.h) are actually heavy enough that we might
care.
llvm-svn: 360291
Summary:
... and its related functions.
The structure and its functionalities are identical to existing ones.
The header stores information on a `scudo::Chunk` to be able to detect
inconsitencies or potential corruption attempts. It is checksummed for
that purpose.
Reviewers: morehouse, eugenis, vitalybuka, hctim
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: mgorny, delcypher, jfb, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61654
llvm-svn: 360290
Summary:
Split defines.txt into diagnostics test and functionality test. Also add
comments, remove the semicolon prefix and group RUN lines with their
CHECK directives.
Reviewers: jhenderson, probinson, arichardson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61679
llvm-svn: 360289
Summary:
Fix various issues in code style of method comments:
1) Move all heading comments to all non-static methods near their
declaration in the FileCheck.h header file.
2) Harmonize the action verb in doxygen comments for methods to always
be in third person
3) Use \returns instead of free text "return" and "returns".
4) Document a couple more parameters while at it.
Reviewers: jhenderson, probinson, arichardson
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61445
llvm-svn: 360288
The worklist loop that we're returning back to should be able to do the repacement itself. This is how we normally do replacements.
My main motivation was that I observed that we weren't preserving the name of the result when we do this transform. The replacement code in the worklist loop will call takeName as part of the replacement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61695
llvm-svn: 360284
InsertBinop tries to move insertion-points out of loops for expressions
that are loop-invariant. This patch adds a new parameter, IsSafeToHost,
to guard that hoisting. This allows callers to suppress that hoisting
for unsafe situations, such as divisions that may have a zero
denominator.
This fixes PR38697.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55232
llvm-svn: 360280
When assigning the definitions of an instruction we were updating
the available registers while walking the definitions. Some of
those definitions may be from physical registers and thus, they are
not available for other definitions to take, but by the time we see
that we may have already assign these registers to another
virtual register.
Fix that by walking through all the definitions and mark as unavailable
the physical register definitions, then do the virtual register assignments.
PR41790
llvm-svn: 360278
This patch adds support for calling selectFNeg for FNeg instructions in addition to the fsub idiom
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61624
llvm-svn: 360273
compatibility. This allows some applications developed with MSVC to
compile with clang without any extra changes.
Fixes: llvm.org/PR40789
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61646
llvm-svn: 360271
Summary:
Preserve MemorySSA in LoopSimplify, in the old pass manager, if the analysis is available.
Do not preserve it in the new pass manager.
Update tests.
Subscribers: nemanjai, jlebar, javed.absar, Prazek, kbarton, zzheng, jsji, llvm-commits, george.burgess.iv, chandlerc
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60833
llvm-svn: 360270
The run command is only an abbreviation for the more verbose process
launch -- <args> but it works just as with GDB and therefore should be
mentioned in the GDB to LLDB command map.
For educational purposes I've not listed it as the first option on the
LLDB side so that new LLDB user can, if they want, also know what the
"native" way is for LLDB.
Here's the help documentation for the run command in lldb which gives
proof:
> (lldb) help run
> Launch the executable in the debugger.
>
> Syntax: run [<run-args>]
>
> Command Options Usage:
> run [<run-args>]
>
> 'run' is an abbreviation for 'process launch -c /bin/sh --'
Patch by: Konrad Kleine
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61483
llvm-svn: 360269
Summary:
In this patch we propose a temporary solution to resolving math functions for the NVPTX toolchain, temporary until OpenMP variant is supported by Clang.
We intercept the inclusion of math.h and cmath headers and if we are in the OpenMP-NVPTX case, we re-use CUDA's math function resolution mechanism.
Authors:
@gtbercea
@jdoerfert
Reviewers: hfinkel, caomhin, ABataev, tra
Reviewed By: hfinkel, ABataev, tra
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, mgorny, guansong, cfe-commits, jdoerfert
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61399
llvm-svn: 360265
Just-built-clang is used to compile the test, but the library is built
with gcc, so the usual 80-bit FPU vs 32-bit SSE mismatch makes the
floating computations not bitwise identical. Fixes PR32910, see there
for details.
This uses the same technique used in all the other *c3* tests, see in
particular mulsc3_test.c.
(It might be cleaner to add compareResultCF to fp_test.h to force the
floats into 32-bit in memory, but this is the less invasive fix.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61684
llvm-svn: 360264
This was committed in rL358887 but reverted in rL360066 due to a x86 regression, really it should be have been pre-committed instead of being part of the SimplifyDemandedBits bitcast patch.
llvm-svn: 360263
Reassociation's NegateValue moved instructions to the beginning of
blocks (after PHIs) without checking for exception handling pads.
It's possible for reassociation to move something into an exception
handling block so we need to make sure we don't move things too early
in the block. This change advances the insertion point past any
exception handling pads.
If the block we want to move into contains a catchswitch, we cannot
move into it. In that case just create a new neg as if we had not
found an existing neg to move.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61089
llvm-svn: 360262
Richard Smith