instead of having a special-purpose function.
- ActOnCXXDirectInitializer, which was mostly duplication of
AddInitializerToDecl (leading e.g. to PR10620, which Eli fixed a few days
ago), is dropped completely.
- MultiInitializer, which was an ugly hack I added, is dropped again.
- We now have the infrastructure in place to distinguish between
int x = {1};
int x({1});
int x{1};
-- VarDecl now has getInitStyle(), which indicates which of the above was used.
-- CXXConstructExpr now has a flag to indicate that it represents list-
initialization, although this is not yet used.
- InstantiateInitializer was renamed to SubstInitializer and simplified.
- ActOnParenOrParenListExpr has been replaced by ActOnParenListExpr, which
always produces a ParenListExpr. Placed that so far failed to convert that
back to a ParenExpr containing comma operators have been fixed. I'm pretty
sure I could have made a crashing test case before this.
The end result is a (I hope) considerably cleaner design of initializers.
More importantly, the fact that I can now distinguish between the various
initialization kinds means that I can get the tricky generalized initializer
test cases Johannes Schaub supplied to work. (This is not yet done.)
This commit passed self-host, with the resulting compiler passing the tests. I
hope it doesn't break more complicated code. It's a pretty big change, but one
that I feel is necessary.
llvm-svn: 150318
This is a great warning, but it was observed that a ton of real world code violates
it all the time for (semi-)legitimate reasons. This warnings is fairly pedantic, which is good,
but not for everyone. For example, there is a fair amount of idiomatic code out there
that does "default: abort()", and similar idioms.
Addresses <rdar://problem/10814651>.
llvm-svn: 150055
value of class type, look for a unique conversion operator converting to
integral or unscoped enumeration type and use that. Implements [expr.const]p5.
Sema::VerifyIntegerConstantExpression now performs the conversion and returns
the converted result. Some important callers of Expr::isIntegralConstantExpr
have been switched over to using it (including all of those required for C++11
conformance); this switch brings a side-benefit of improved diagnostics and, in
several cases, simpler code. However, some language extensions and attributes
have not been moved across and will not perform implicit conversions on
constant expressions of literal class type where an ICE is required.
In passing, fix static_assert to perform a contextual conversion to bool on its
argument.
llvm-svn: 149776
argument in strncat.
The warning is ignored by default since it needs more qualification.
TODO: The warning message and the note are messy when
strncat is a builtin due to the macro expansion.
llvm-svn: 149524
- Remove the printf0 special handling as we treat it as printf anyway.
- Perform basic checks (non-literal, empty) for all formats and not only printf/scanf.
llvm-svn: 149236
like Darwin that don't support it. We should also complain about
invalid -fvisibility=protected, but that information doesn't seem
to exist at the most appropriate time, so I've left a FIXME behind.
llvm-svn: 149186
Rewording the diagnostic to be more precise/correct: "default label in switch
which covers all enumeration values" and changed the switch to
-Wcovered-switch-default
llvm-svn: 148783
Changing wording to include the word "explicitly" (as in "enumeration value ...
not /explicitly/ handled by switch"), as suggested by Richard Smith.
Also, now that the diagnostic text differs between -Wswitch and -Wswitch-enum,
I've simplified the test cases a bit.
llvm-svn: 148781
This is for consistency, since the flag is actually under -Wswitch now, rather
than -Wswitch-enum (since it's really valuable for the former and rather
orthogonal to the latter)
llvm-svn: 148680
Clang previously implemented -Wswitch-enum the same as -Wswitch. This patch
corrects the behavior to match GCC's. The critical/only difference being that
-Wswitch-enum is not silenced by the presence of a default case in the switch.
llvm-svn: 148679
For consistency with GCC & reasonable sanity. The FIXME suggests that the
original author was perhaps using the default check for some other purpose,
not realizing the more obvious limitation/false-negatives it creates, but this
doesn't seem to produce any regressions & fixes the included test.
llvm-svn: 148649
This warning acts as the complement to the main -Wswitch-enum warning (which
warns whenever a switch over enum without a default doesn't cover all values of
the enum) & has been an an-doc coding convention in LLVM and Clang in my
experience. The purpose is to ensure there's never a "dead" default in a
switch-over-enum because this would hide future -Wswitch-enum errors.
The name warning has a separate flag name so it can be disabled but it's grouped
under -Wswitch-enum & is on-by-default because of this.
The existing violations of this rule in test cases have had the warning disabled
& I've added a specific test for the new behavior (many negative cases already
exist in the same test file - and none regressed - so I didn't add more).
Reviewed by Ted Kremenek ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120116/051690.html )
llvm-svn: 148640
Includes tests highlighting the cases where accuracy has improved
(there is one call that does no filtering beyond selecting the set
of allowed keywords, and one call that only triggers for ObjC code
for which a test by someone who knows ObjC would be welcome). Also
fixes a small typo in one of the suggestion messages, and drops a
malformed "expected-note" for a suggestion that did not occur even
when the malformed note was committed as r145930.
llvm-svn: 148420
not integer constant expressions. In passing, fix the 'folding is an extension'
diagnostic to not claim we're accepting the code, since that's not true in
-pedantic-errors mode, and add this diagnostic to -Wgnu.
llvm-svn: 148209
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
whether an expression is a (core) constant expression as a side-effect of
evaluation. This takes us from accepting far too few expressions as ICEs to
accepting slightly too many -- fixes for the remaining cases are coming next.
The diagnostics produced when an expression is found to be non-constant are
currently quite poor (with generic wording but reasonable source locations),
and will be improved in subsequent commits.
llvm-svn: 146289
documentation) with one based on what GCC's __builtin_constant_p is actually
intended to do (discovered by asking a friendly GCC developer).
In particular, an expression which folds to a pointer is now only considered to
be a "constant" by this builtin if it refers to the first character in a string
literal.
This fixes a rather subtle wrong-code issue when building with glibc. Given:
const char cs[4] = "abcd";
int f(const char *p) { return strncmp(p, cs, 4); }
... the macro magic for strncmp produces a (potentially crashing) call to
strlen(cs), because it expands to an expression starting with:
__builtin_constant_p(cs) && strlen(cs) < 4 ? /* ... */
Under the secret true meaning of __builtin_constant_p, this is guaranteed to be
safe!
llvm-svn: 146236
they are treated as errors.
Doing typo correction when these are just warnings slows down the
compilation of source which deliberately uses implicit function
declarations.
llvm-svn: 146153
in addition to underlying type.
For example, the warning for printf("%zu", 42.0);
changes from "conversion specifies type 'unsigned long'" to "conversion
specifies type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long')"
(This is a second attempt after r145697, which got reverted.)
llvm-svn: 146032
bound to not have side effects(!). Add constant-folding support for expressions
of void type, to ensure that we can still fold ((void)0, 1) as an array bound.
llvm-svn: 146000
For example, the warning for printf("%zu", 42.0);
changes from "conversion specifies type 'unsigned long'" to "conversion
specifies type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long')"
llvm-svn: 145697
The Neon load/store intrinsics need to be implemented as macros to avoid
hiding alignment attributes on the pointer arguments, and the macros can
only evaluate those pointer arguments once (in case they have side effects),
so it has been hard to get the right type checking for those pointers.
I tried various alternatives in the arm_neon.h header, but it's much more
straightforward to just check directly in Sema.
llvm-svn: 144075
string is part of the function call, then there is no difference. If the
format string is not, the warning will point to the call site and a note
will point to where the format string is.
Fix-it hints for strings are moved to the note if a note is emitted. This will
prevent changes to format strings that may be used in multiple places.
llvm-svn: 143168
The code had it backwards, thinking size_t was signed, and using that for "%zd".
Also let the analysis get the types for (u)intmax_t while we are at it.
llvm-svn: 143099
Use "%f" as format string to make sure it doesn't match size_t, etc.
whatever they might be typedeffed to, so that the fixit always applies.
llvm-svn: 142348
Turns out this part of the test from r142342 wasn't portable.
The errors on the bots look like this:
E:\bb-win7\cmake-clang-i686-msys\build\tools\clang\test\Sema\Output\format-strings-fixit.c.tmp:58:13: error: conversion specifies type 'unsigned int' but the argument has type 'ssize_t' (aka 'long')
printf("%zd", (ssize_t) 42);
~~^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
%zd
Obviously we can't typedef ssize_t to someting that doesn't have the same size as size_t and expect it to work.
But it's also weird that the format string "%zd" gets interpreted as "unsigned int" when it should clearly be signed.
llvm-svn: 142345
For PR11152. Make PrintSpecifier::fixType() suggest "%zu" for size_t, etc.
rather than looking at the underlying type and suggesting "%llu" or other
platform-specific length modifiers. Applies to C99 and C++11.
llvm-svn: 142342
changed the return type of a compare of two unsigned vectors to be unsigned. This patch removes the check for hasIntegerRepresentation since its not needed and returns the appropriate signed type.
I added a new test case and updated exisiting test cases that assumed an unsigned result.
llvm-svn: 142250
This changes clang to match GCC's behavior for __extension__, which temporarily
disables the -pedantic flag. Warnings that are enabled without -pedantic
are not affected. Besides the general goodness of matching GCC's precedent,
my motivation for this is that macros in the arm_neon.h header need to use
__extension__ to avoid pedantic complaints about their use of statement
expressions, yet we still want to warn about incompatible pointer arguments
for those macros.
llvm-svn: 141804
return to one which does not return (has noreturn attribute)
should warn as it is an unsafe assignment. // rdar://10095762
c++ already handles this. This is the c version.
llvm-svn: 141141
CoreFoundation object-transfer properties audited, and add a #pragma
to cause them to be automatically applied to functions in a particular
span of code. This has to be implemented largely in the preprocessor
because of the requirement that the region be entirely contained in
a single file; that's hard to impose from the parser without registering
for a ton of callbacks.
llvm-svn: 140846
RUN: foo
RUN: bar || true
is equivalent to:
RUN: foo && bar || true
which is equivalent to:
RUN: (foo && bar) || true
This resulted in several of the fixit tests not really testing anything.
llvm-svn: 139132
of the function in question when applicable (that is, not for blocks).
Patch by Joerg Sonnenberger with some stylistic tweaks by me.
When discussing this weth Joerg, streaming the decl directly into the
diagnostic didn't work because we have a pointer-to-const, and the
overload doesn't accept such. In order to make my style tweaks to the
patch, I first changed the overload to accept a pointer-to-const, and
then changed the diagnostic printing layer to also use
a pointer-to-const, cleaning up a gross line of code along the way.
llvm-svn: 138854
incorrectly in the CFG, and also the static analyzer. This patch regresses the analyzer a bit, but
that needs to be followed up with a better solution.
Fixes <rdar://problem/10008112>.
llvm-svn: 138372
Currently this includes -pedantic warnings as well; we'll need to consider whether these should
be included.
This works as expected with -Werror.
Test cases were added to Sema/warn-unused-parameters.c, but they should probably be broken off into
their own test file.
llvm-svn: 137910
-Wunused was a mistake. It resulted in duplicate warnings and lots of
other hacks. Instead, this should be a special sub-category to
-Wunused-value, much like -Wunused-result is.
Moved to -Wunused-comparison, moved the implementation to piggy back on
the -Wunused-value implementation instead of rolling its own, different
mechanism for catching all of the "interesting" statements.
I like the unused-value mechanism for this better, but its currently
missing several top-level statements. For now, I've FIXME-ed out those
test cases. I'll enhance the generic infrastructure to catch these
statements in a subsequent patch.
This patch also removes the cast-to-void fixit hint. This hint isn't
available on any of the other -Wunused-value diagnostics, and if we want
it to be, we should add it generically rather than in one specific case.
llvm-svn: 137822
AnalysisBasedWarnings Sema layer and out of the Analysis library itself.
This returns the uninitialized values analysis to a more pure form,
allowing its original logic to correctly detect some categories of
definitely uninitialized values. Fixes PR10358 (again).
Thanks to Ted for reviewing and updating this patch after his rewrite of
several portions of this analysis.
llvm-svn: 135748
This is accomplished by forcing the needed expressions for -Wuninitialized to always be CFGElements in the CFG.
This allows us to remove a fair amount of the code for -Wuninitialized.
Some fallout:
- AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp now specifically toggles the CFGBuilder to create a CFG that is suitable for -Wuninitialized. This
is a layering violation, since the logic for -Wuninitialized is in libAnalysis. This can be fixed with the proper refactoring.
- Some of the source locations for -Wunreachable-code warnings have shifted. While not ideal, this is okay because that analysis
already needs some serious reworking.
llvm-svn: 135480
patch, we actually move the state-machine for the value set backwards
one step. This can pretty easily lead to infinite loops where we
continually try to propagate a bit, succeed for one iteration, but then
back up because we find an uninitialized use.
A reduced test case from PR10379 is included.
llvm-svn: 135359
Note that because we don't usually touch the MMX registers anyway, all -mno-mmx needs to do is tweak the x86-32 calling convention a little for vectors that look like MMX vectors, and prevent the definition of __MMX__.
clang doesn't actually stop the user from using MMX inline asm operands or MMX builtins in -mno-mmx mode; as a QOI issue, it would be nice to diagnose, but I doubt it really matters much.
<rdar://problem/9694837>
llvm-svn: 134770
arithmetic into a couple of common routines. Use these to make the
messages more consistent in the various contexts, especially in terms of
consistently diagnosing binary operators with invalid types on both the
left- and right-hand side. Also, improve the grammar and wording of the
messages some, handling both two pointers and two (different) types.
The wording of function pointer arithmetic diagnostics still strikes me
as poorly phrased, and I worry this makes them slightly more awkward if
more consistent. I'm hoping to fix that with a follow-on patch and test
case that will also make them more helpful when a typedef or template
type parameter makes the type completely opaque.
Suggestions on better wording are very welcome, thanks to Richard Smith
for some initial help on that front.
llvm-svn: 133906
pointers I found while working on the NULL arithmetic warning. We here
always assuming the LHS was the pointer, instead of using the selected
pointer expression.
llvm-svn: 133428
pretty. In particular this makes it much easier for me to read messages
such as:
x.cc:42: ?: has lower ...
Where I'm inclined to associate the third ':' with a missing column
number, but in fact column numbers have been turned off. Similar
punctuation collisions happened elsewhere as well.
llvm-svn: 133121
Change the output for -Wshift-overflow and
-Wshift-sign-overflow to an unsigned hexadecimal. It makes
more sense for looking at bits than a signed decimal does.
Also, change the diagnostic's wording from "overrides"
to "sets".
This uses a new optional argument in APInt::toString()
that adds the '0x' prefix to hexademical numbers.
This fixes PR 9651.
Patch by nobled@dreamwidth.org!
llvm-svn: 133033
as constant size arrays. This has slightly different semantics in some insane cases, but allows
us to accept some constructs that GCC does. Continue to be pedantic in -std=c99 and other
modes. This addressed rdar://8733881 - error "variable-sized object may not be initialized"; g++ accepts same code
llvm-svn: 132983
- Move a test from test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-expr-3.cpp, it did not belong there
- Incomplete and abstract types are considered hard errors
llvm-svn: 132979
This is a follow-up to r132565, and should address the rest of PR9969:
Warn about cases such as
int foo(A a, bool b) {
return a + b ? 1 : 2; // user probably meant a + (b ? 1 : 2);
}
also when + is an overloaded operator call.
llvm-svn: 132784
Warn in cases such as "x + someCondition ? 42 : 0;",
where the condition expression looks arithmetic, and has
a right-hand side that looks boolean.
This (partly) addresses http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9969
llvm-svn: 132565
The size of the array may not be aligned according to alignment of its elements if an alignment attribute is
specified in a typedef. Fixes rdar://8665729 & http://llvm.org/PR5637.
llvm-svn: 130242
-Wwrite-strings. First and foremost, once the positive form of the flag
was passed, it could never be disabled by passing -Wno-write-strings.
Also, the diagnostic engine couldn't in turn use -Wwrite-strings to
control diagnostics (as GCC does) because it was essentially hijacked to
drive the language semantics.
Fix this by giving CC1 a clean '-fconst-strings' flag to enable
const-qualified strings in C and ObjC compilations. Corresponding
'-fno-const-strings' is also added. Then the driver is taught to
introduce '-fconst-strings' in the CC1 command when '-Wwrite-strings'
dominates.
This entire flag is basically GCC-bug-compatibility driven, so we also
match GCC's bug where '-w' doesn't actually disable -Wwrite-strings. I'm
open to changing this though as it seems insane.
llvm-svn: 130051
gcc's unused warnings which don't get emitted if the function is referenced even in an unevaluated context
(e.g. in templates, sizeof, etc.). Also, saying that a function is 'unused' because it won't get codegen'ed
is somewhat misleading.
- Don't emit 'unused' warnings for functions that are referenced in any part of the user's code.
- A warning that an internal function/variable won't get emitted is useful though, so introduce
-Wunneeded-internal-declaration which will warn if a function/variable with internal linkage is not
"needed" ('used' from the codegen perspective), e.g:
static void foo() { }
template <int>
void bar() {
foo();
}
test.cpp:1:13: warning: function 'foo' is not needed and will not be emitted
static void foo() { }
^
Addresses rdar://8733476.
llvm-svn: 129794
CL_AddressableVoid is the expression classification used for void
expressions whose address can be taken, i.e. the result of [], *
or void variable references in C, as opposed to things like the
result of a void function call.
llvm-svn: 129783
rewriting the literal when the value is integral. It is not uncommon to
see code written as:
const int kBigNumber = 42e5;
Without any real awareness that this is no longer an ICE. The note helps
automate and ease the process of fixing code that violates the warning.
llvm-svn: 129243
definitely have a path leading to them, and possibly have a path leading
to them; reflect that distinction in the warning text emitted.
llvm-svn: 129126
marked explicitly as uninitialized through direct self initialization:
int x = x;
With r128894 we prevented warnings about this code, and this patch
teaches the analysis engine to continue analyzing subsequent uses of
'x'. This should wrap up PR9624.
There is still an open question of whether we should suppress the
maybe-uninitialized warnings resulting from variables initialized in
this fashion. The definitely-uninitialized uses should always be warned.
llvm-svn: 128932
int x = x;
GCC disables its warnings on this construct as a way of indicating that
the programmer intentionally wants the variable to be uninitialized.
Only the warning on the initializer is turned off in this iteration.
This makes the code a lot more ugly, but starts commenting the
surprising behavior here. This is a WIP, I want to refactor it
substantially for clarity, and to determine whether subsequent warnings
should be suppressed or not.
llvm-svn: 128894
1) Change the CFG to include the DeclStmt for conditional variables, instead of using the condition itself as a faux DeclStmt.
2) Update ExprEngine (the static analyzer) to understand (1), so not to regress.
3) Update UninitializedValues.cpp to initialize all tracked variables to Uninitialized at the start of the function/method.
4) Only use the SelfReferenceChecker (SemaDecl.cpp) on global variables, leaving the dataflow analysis to handle other cases.
The combination of (1) and (3) allows the dataflow-based -Wuninitialized to find self-init problems when the initializer
contained control-flow.
llvm-svn: 128858
Note this can potentially be enhanced to detect if the __block variable
is actually written by the block, or only when the block "escapes" or
is actually used, but that requires more analysis than it is probably worth
for this simple check.
llvm-svn: 128681
which versions of an OS provide a certain facility. For example,
void foo()
__attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.2,deprecated=10.4,obsoleted=10.6)));
says that the function "foo" was introduced in 10.2, deprecated in
10.4, and completely obsoleted in 10.6. This attribute ties in with
the deployment targets (e.g., -mmacosx-version-min=10.1 specifies that
we want to deploy back to Mac OS X 10.1). There are several concrete
behaviors that this attribute enables, as illustrated with the
function foo() above:
- If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.4, uses of "foo"
will result in a deprecation warning, as if we had placed
attribute((deprecated)) on it (but with a better diagnostic)
- If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.6, uses of "foo"
will result in an "unavailable" warning (in C)/error (in C++), as
if we had placed attribute((unavailable)) on it
- If we choose a deployment target prior to 10.2, foo() is
weak-imported (if it is a kind of entity that can be weak
imported), as if we had placed the weak_import attribute on it.
Naturally, there can be multiple availability attributes on a
declaration, for different platforms; only the current platform
matters when checking availability attributes.
The only platforms this attribute currently works for are "ios" and
"macosx", since we already have -mxxxx-version-min flags for them and we
have experience there with macro tricks translating down to the
deprecated/unavailable/weak_import attributes. The end goal is to open
this up to other platforms, and even extension to other "platforms"
that are really libraries (say, through a #pragma clang
define_system), but that hasn't yet been designed and we may want to
shake out more issues with this narrower problem first.
Addresses <rdar://problem/6690412>.
As a drive-by bug-fix, if an entity is both deprecated and
unavailable, we only emit the "unavailable" diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 128127
enumeration type to another in C, classify enumeration constants as if
they had the type of their enclosing enumeration. Fixes
<rdar://problem/9116337>.
llvm-svn: 127514
expressions. Consider the code:
int64_t i = 10 << 30;
This compiles fine, but most developers expect it to produce the value
for 10 gigs, not -2 gigs. This is actually undefined behavior because
the LHS is a signed integer type.
The warning is currently gated behind -Wshift-overflow.
There is a special case where only the sign bit is overridden that gets
a custom error message and is by default ignored. This case is much less
likely to cause observed buggy behavior, it's just undefined behavior
according to the spec. This warning can be enabled with
-Wshift-sign-overflow.
Original patch by Oleg Slezberg, with style tweaks and some correctness
fixes by me.
llvm-svn: 126342
several ways. We now warn for more of the return types, and correctly
locate the ignored ones. Also adds fix-it hints to remove the ignored
qualifiers. Fixes much of PR9058, although not all of it.
Patch by Hans Wennborg, a couple of minor style tweaks from me.
llvm-svn: 126321
diagnostics that occur in unreachable code (e.g., -Warray-bound).
We only pay the cost of doing the reachability analysis when we issue one of these diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 126290
enum X : long { Value = 0x100000000 };
when in Microsoft-extension mode (-fms-extensions). This (now C++0x)
feature has been supported since Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003.
llvm-svn: 126243
Sebastian Redl