when they're instantiated. Merge the note into the -Wreorder warning; it
doesn't really contribute much, and it was splitting a thought across diagnostics
anyway. Don't crash in the parser when a constructor's initializers end in a
comma and there's no body; the recovery here is still terrible, but anything's
better than a crash.
llvm-svn: 100922
ranges as part of the ASTContext. This code is not and was never used,
but contributes ~250k to the size of the Cocoa.h precompiled
header.
llvm-svn: 99007
which has the label map, switch statement stack, etc. Previously, we
had a single set of maps in Sema (for the function) along with a stack
of block scopes. However, this lead to funky behavior with nested
functions, e.g., in the member functions of local classes.
The explicit-stack approach is far cleaner, and we retain a 1-element
cache so that we're not malloc/free'ing every time we enter a
function. Fixes PR6382.
Also, tweaked the unused-variable warning suppression logic to look at
errors within a given Scope rather than within a given function. The
prior code wasn't looking at the right number-of-errors count when
dealing with blocks, since the block's count would be deallocated
before we got to ActOnPopScope. This approach works with nested
blocks/functions, and gives tighter error recovery.
llvm-svn: 97518
propagating error conditions out of the various annotate-me-a-snowflake
routines. Generally (but not universally) removes redundant diagnostics
as well as, you know, not crashing on bad code. On the other hand,
I have just signed myself up to fix fiddly parser errors for the next
week. Again.
llvm-svn: 97221
we would just leak them all over the place, with no clear ownership of
these objects at all. AttributeList objects would get leaked on both
error and non-error paths.
Note: I introduced the usage of llvm::OwningPtr<AttributeList> to
manage these objects, which is particularly useful for methods with
multiple return sites. In at least one method I used them even when
they weren't strictly necessary because it clarified the ownership
semantics and made the code easier to read. Should the excessive
'take()' and 'reset()' calls become a performance issue we can always
re-evaluate.
Note+1: I believe I have not introduced any double-frees, but it would
be nice for someone to review this.
This fixes <rdar://problem/7635046>.
llvm-svn: 95847
provide completions for @ keywords. Previously, we only provided
@-completions after an @ was actually typed, which is useful but
probably not the common case.
Also, make sure a few Objective-C 2.0 completions only show up when
Objective-C 2.0 support is enabled (the default).
llvm-svn: 93354
that name constructors, the endless joys of out-of-line constructor
definitions, and various other corner cases that the previous hack
never imagined. Fixes PR5688 and tightens up semantic analysis for
constructor names.
Additionally, fixed a problem where we wouldn't properly enter the
declarator scope of a parenthesized declarator. We were entering the
scope, then leaving it when we saw the ")"; now, we re-enter the
declarator scope before parsing the parameter list.
Note that we are forced to perform some tentative parsing within a
class (call it C) to tell the difference between
C(int); // constructor
and
C (f)(int); // member function
which is rather unfortunate. And, although it isn't necessary for
correctness, we use the same tentative-parsing mechanism for
out-of-line constructors to improve diagnostics in icky cases like:
C::C C::f(int); // error: C::C refers to the constructor name, but
// we complain nicely and recover by treating it as
// a type.
llvm-svn: 93322
C++ grammatical constructs that show up in top-level (namespace-level)
declarations, member declarations, template declarations, statements,
expressions, conditions, etc. For example, we now provide a pattern
for
static_cast<type>(expr)
when we can have an expression, or
using namespace identifier;
when we can have a using directive.
Also, improves the results of code completion at the beginning of a
top-level declaration. Previously, we would see value names (function
names, global variables, etc.); now we see types, namespace names,
etc., but no values.
llvm-svn: 93134
The following attributes are currently supported in C++0x attribute
lists (and in GNU ones as well):
- align() - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations and what entities it may apply to
- final - semantics believed to be conformant to CWG issue 817's proposed
wording, except for redeclarations
- noreturn - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations
- carries_dependency - currently ignored (this is an optimization hint)
llvm-svn: 89543
handling template template parameters properly. This refactoring:
- Parses template template arguments as id-expressions, representing
the result of the parse as a template name (Action::TemplateTy)
rather than as an expression (lame!).
- Represents all parsed template arguments via a new parser-specific
type, ParsedTemplateArgument, which stores the kind of template
argument (type, non-type, template) along with all of the source
information about the template argument. This replaces an ad hoc
set of 3 vectors (one for a void*, which was either a type or an
expression; one for a bit telling whether the first was a type or
an expression; and one for a single source location pointing at
the template argument).
- Moves TemplateIdAnnotation into the new Parse/Template.h. It never
belonged in the Basic library anyway.
llvm-svn: 86708
appears in a deprecated context. In the new strategy, we emit the warnings
as usual unless we're currently parsing a declaration, where "declaration" is
restricted to mean a decl group or a few special cases in Objective C. If
we *are* parsing a declaration, we queue up the deprecation warnings until
the declaration has been completely parsed, and then emit them only if the
decl is not deprecated.
We also standardize the bookkeeping for deprecation so as to avoid special cases.
llvm-svn: 85998
operators, e.g.,
operator+<int>
which now works in declarators, id-expressions, and member access
expressions. This commit only implements the non-dependent case, where
we can resolve the template-id to an actual declaration.
llvm-svn: 85966
declarators are parsed primarily within a single function (at least for
these cases). Remove some excess diagnostics arising during parse failures.
llvm-svn: 85924
x->Base::f
We no longer try to "enter" the context of the type that "x" points
to. Instead, we drag that object type through the parser and pass it
into the Sema routines that need to know how to perform lookup within
member access expressions.
We now implement most of the crazy name lookup rules in C++
[basic.lookup.classref] for non-templated code, including performing
lookup both in the context of the type referred to by the member
access and in the scope of the member access itself and then detecting
ambiguities when the two lookups collide (p1 and p4; p3 and p7 are
still TODO). This change also corrects our handling of name lookup
within template arguments of template-ids inside the
nested-name-specifier (p6; we used to look into the scope of the
object expression for them) and fixes PR4703.
I have disabled some tests that involve member access expressions
where the object expression has dependent type, because we don't yet
have the ability to describe dependent nested-name-specifiers starting
with an identifier.
llvm-svn: 80843
their members, including member class template, member function
templates, and member classes and functions of member templates.
To actually parse the nested-name-specifiers that qualify the name of
an out-of-line definition of a member template, e.g.,
template<typename X> template<typename Y>
X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::foo(Y) {
return X();
}
we need to look for the template names (e.g., "Inner1") as a member of
the current instantiation (Outer<X>), even before we have entered the
scope of the current instantiation. Since we can't do this in general
(i.e., we should not be looking into all dependent
nested-name-specifiers as if they were the current instantiation), we
rely on the parser to tell us when it is parsing a declaration
specifier sequence, and, therefore, when we should consider the
current scope specifier to be a current instantiation.
Printing of complicated, dependent nested-name-specifiers may be
somewhat broken by this commit; I'll add tests for this issue and fix
the problem (if it still exists) in a subsequent commit.
llvm-svn: 80044
member templates declared inside other templates. This allows us to
match out-of-line definitions of member function templates within
class templates to the declarations within the class template. We
still can't handle out-of-line definitions for member class templates,
however.
llvm-svn: 79955
elsewhere. Very slightly decouples DeclSpec users from knowing the exact
diagnostics to report, and makes it easier to provide different diagnostics in
some places.
llvm-svn: 77990
declaration in the AST.
The new ASTContext::getCommentForDecl function searches for a comment
that is attached to the given declaration, and returns that comment,
which may be composed of several comment blocks.
Comments are always available in an AST. However, to avoid harming
performance, we don't actually parse the comments. Rather, we keep the
source ranges of all of the comments within a large, sorted vector,
then lazily extract comments via a binary search in that vector only
when needed (which never occurs in a "normal" compile).
Comments are written to a precompiled header/AST file as a blob of
source ranges. That blob is only lazily loaded when one requests a
comment for a declaration (this never occurs in a "normal" compile).
The indexer testbed now supports comment extraction. When the
-point-at location points to a declaration with a Doxygen-style
comment, the indexer testbed prints the associated comment
block(s). See test/Index/comments.c for an example.
Some notes:
- We don't actually attempt to parse the comment blocks themselves,
beyond identifying them as Doxygen comment blocks to associate them
with a declaration.
- We won't find comment blocks that aren't adjacent to the
declaration, because we start our search based on the location of
the declaration.
- We don't go through the necessary hops to find, for example,
whether some redeclaration of a declaration has comments when our
current declaration does not. Similarly, we don't attempt to
associate a \param Foo marker in a function body comment with the
parameter named Foo (although that is certainly possible).
- Verification of my "no performance impact" claims is still "to be
done".
llvm-svn: 74704
making sure we return true when annotating a function template with
explicit template arguments, but not when we don't annotate anything.)
llvm-svn: 74383
parser. Rather than placing all of the delayed member function
declarations and inline definitions into a single bucket corresponding
to the top-level class, we instead mirror the nesting structure of the
nested classes and place the delayed member functions into their
appropriate place. Then, when we actually parse the delayed member
function declarations, set up the scope stack the same way as it was
when we originally saw the declaration, so that we can find, e.g.,
template parameters that are in scope.
llvm-svn: 72502
template class X<int>;
This also cleans up the propagation of template information through
declaration parsing, which is used to improve some diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 71608
parse just a single declaration and provide a reasonable diagnostic
when the "only one declarator per template declaration" rule is
violated. This eliminates some ugly, ugly hackery where we used to
require thatn the layout of a DeclGroup of a single element be the
same as the layout of a single declaration.
llvm-svn: 71596
of the range is now the ';' location. For something like this:
$ cat t2.c
#define bool int
void f(int x, int y) {
bool b = !x && y;
}
We used to produce:
$ clang-cc t2.c -ast-dump
typedef char *__builtin_va_list;
void f(int x, int y)
(CompoundStmt 0x2201f10 <t2.c:3:22, line:5:1>
(DeclStmt 0x2201ef0 <line:2:14> <----
0x2201a20 "int b =
(BinaryOperator 0x2201ed0 <line:4:10, col:16> 'int' '&&'
(UnaryOperator 0x2201e90 <col:10, col:11> 'int' prefix '!'
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201c90 <col:11> 'int' ParmVar='x' 0x2201a50))
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201eb0 <col:16> 'int' ParmVar='y' 0x2201e10))")
Now we produce:
$ clang-cc t2.c -ast-dump
typedef char *__builtin_va_list;
void f(int x, int y)
(CompoundStmt 0x2201f10 <t2.c:3:22, line:5:1>
(DeclStmt 0x2201ef0 <line:2:14, line:4:17> <------
0x2201a20 "int b =
(BinaryOperator 0x2201ed0 <col:10, col:16> 'int' '&&'
(UnaryOperator 0x2201e90 <col:10, col:11> 'int' prefix '!'
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201c90 <col:11> 'int' ParmVar='x' 0x2201a50))
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201eb0 <col:16> 'int' ParmVar='y' 0x2201e10))")
llvm-svn: 68288
failures that involve malformed types, e.g., "typename X::foo" where
"foo" isn't a type, or "std::vector<void>" that doens't instantiate
properly.
Similarly, be a bit smarter in our handling of ambiguities that occur
in Sema::getTypeName, to eliminate duplicate error messages about
ambiguous name lookup.
This eliminates two XFAILs in test/SemaCXX, one of which was crying
out to us, trying to tell us that we were producing repeated error
messages.
llvm-svn: 68251
within nested-name-specifiers, e.g., for the "apply" in
typename MetaFun::template apply<T1, T2>::type
At present, we can't instantiate these nested-name-specifiers, so our
testing is sketchy.
llvm-svn: 68081
representation handles the various ways in which one can name a
template, including unqualified references ("vector"), qualified
references ("std::vector"), and dependent template names
("MetaFun::template apply").
One immediate effect of this change is that the representation of
nested-name-specifiers in type names for class template
specializations (e.g., std::vector<int>) is more accurate. Rather than
representing std::vector<int> as
std::(vector<int>)
we represent it as
(std::vector)<int>
which more closely follows the C++ grammar.
Additionally, templates are no longer represented as declarations
(DeclPtrTy) in Parse-Sema interactions. Instead, I've introduced a new
OpaquePtr type (TemplateTy) that holds the representation of a
TemplateName. This will simplify the handling of dependent
template-names, once we get there.
llvm-svn: 68074
productions (except the already broken ObjC cases like @class X,Y;) in
the parser that can produce more than one Decl return a DeclGroup instead
of a Decl, etc.
This allows elimination of the Decl::NextDeclarator field, and exposes
various clients that should look at all decls in a group, but which were
only looking at one (such as the dumper, printer, etc). These have been
fixed.
Still TODO:
1) there are some FIXME's in the code about potentially using
DeclGroup for better location info.
2) ParseObjCAtDirectives should return a DeclGroup due to @class etc.
3) I'm not sure what is going on with StmtIterator.cpp, or if it can
be radically simplified now.
4) I put a truly horrible hack in ParseTemplate.cpp.
I plan to bring up #3/4 on the mailing list, but don't plan to tackle
#1/2 in the short term.
llvm-svn: 68002
pointer. Its purpose in life is to be a glorified void*, but which does not
implicitly convert to void* or other OpaquePtr's with a different UID.
Introduce Action::DeclPtrTy which is a typedef for OpaquePtr<0>. Change the
entire parser/sema interface to use DeclPtrTy instead of DeclTy*. This
makes the C++ compiler enforce that these aren't convertible to other opaque
types.
We should also convert ExprTy, StmtTy, TypeTy, AttrTy, BaseTy, etc,
but I don't plan to do that in the short term.
The one outstanding known problem with this patch is that we lose the
bitmangling optimization where ActionResult<DeclPtrTy> doesn't know how to
bitmangle the success bit into the low bit of DeclPtrTy. I will rectify
this with a subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 67952
instantiation for C++ typename-specifiers such as
typename T::type
The parsing of typename-specifiers is relatively easy thanks to
annotation tokens. When we see the "typename", we parse the
typename-specifier and produce a typename annotation token. There are
only a few places where we need to handle this. We currently parse the
typename-specifier form that terminates in an identifier, but not the
simple-template-id form, e.g.,
typename T::template apply<U, V>
Parsing of nested-name-specifiers has a similar problem, since at this
point we don't have any representation of a class template
specialization whose template-name is unknown.
Semantic analysis is only partially complete, with some support for
template instantiation that works for simple examples.
llvm-svn: 67875
class C {
C() { }
int a;
};
C::C() : a(10) { }
We also diagnose when initializers are used on declarations that aren't constructors:
t.cpp:1:10: error: only constructors take base initializers
void f() : a(10) { }
^
Doug and/or Sebastian: I'd appreciate a review, especially the nested-name-spec test results (from the looks of it we now match gcc in that test.)
llvm-svn: 67672
qualified name, e.g.,
foo::x
so that we retain the nested-name-specifier as written in the source
code and can reproduce that qualified name when printing the types
back (e.g., in diagnostics). This is PR3493, which won't be complete
until finished the other tasks mentioned near the end of this commit.
The parser's representation of nested-name-specifiers, CXXScopeSpec,
is now a bit fatter, because it needs to contain the scopes that
precede each '::' and keep track of whether the global scoping
operator '::' was at the beginning. For example, we need to keep track
of the leading '::', 'foo', and 'bar' in
::foo::bar::x
The Action's CXXScopeTy * is no longer a DeclContext *. It's now the
opaque version of the new NestedNameSpecifier, which contains a single
component of a nested-name-specifier (either a DeclContext * or a Type
*, bitmangled).
The new sugar type QualifiedNameType composes a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers with a representation of the type we're actually
referring to. At present, we only build QualifiedNameType nodes within
Sema::getTypeName. This will be extended to other type-constructing
actions (e.g., ActOnClassTemplateId).
Also on the way: QualifiedDeclRefExprs will also store a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers, so that we can print out the property
nested-name-specifier. I expect to also use this for handling
dependent names like Fibonacci<I - 1>::value.
llvm-svn: 67265
For example:
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: clang t.cpp
1. t.cpp:4:8: current parser token: ';'
2. t.cpp:3:1: parsing struct/union/class body 'x'
Abort
It is weird that the parser is always "underneath" any parse context
actions, but the parser is created first.
llvm-svn: 66148
know how to recover from an error, we can attach a hint to the
diagnostic that states how to modify the code, which can be one of:
- Insert some new code (a text string) at a particular source
location
- Remove the code within a given range
- Replace the code within a given range with some new code (a text
string)
Right now, we use these hints to annotate diagnostic information. For
example, if one uses the '>>' in a template argument in C++98, as in
this code:
template<int I> class B { };
B<1000 >> 2> *b1;
we'll warn that the behavior will change in C++0x. The fix is to
insert parenthese, so we use code insertion annotations to illustrate
where the parentheses go:
test.cpp:10:10: warning: use of right-shift operator ('>>') in template
argument will require parentheses in C++0x
B<1000 >> 2> *b1;
^
( )
Use of these annotations is partially implemented for HTML
diagnostics, but it's not (yet) producing valid HTML, which may be
related to PR2386, so it has been #if 0'd out.
In this future, we could consider hooking this mechanism up to the
rewriter to actually try to fix these problems during compilation (or,
after a compilation whose only errors have fixes). For now, however, I
suggest that we use these code modification hints whenever we can, so
that we get better diagnostics now and will have better coverage when
we find better ways to use this information.
This also fixes PR3410 by placing the complaint about missing tokens
just after the previous token (rather than at the location of the next
token).
llvm-svn: 65570
std::vector<int>::allocator_type
When we parse a template-id that names a type, it will become either a
template-id annotation (which is a parsed representation of a
template-id that has not yet been through semantic analysis) or a
typename annotation (where semantic analysis has resolved the
template-id to an actual type), depending on the context. We only
produce a type in contexts where we know that we only need type
information, e.g., in a type specifier. Otherwise, we create a
template-id annotation that can later be "upgraded" by transforming it
into a typename annotation when the parser needs a type. This occurs,
for example, when we've parsed "std::vector<int>" above and then see
the '::' after it. However, it means that when writing something like
this:
template<> class Outer::Inner<int> { ... };
We have two tokens to represent Outer::Inner<int>: one token for the
nested name specifier Outer::, and one template-id annotation token
for Inner<int>, which will be passed to semantic analysis to define
the class template specialization.
Most of the churn in the template tests in this patch come from an
improvement in our error recovery from ill-formed template-ids.
llvm-svn: 65467
to a class template. For example, the template-id 'vector<int>' now
has a nice, sugary type in the type system. What we can do now:
- Parse template-ids like 'vector<int>' (where 'vector' names a
class template) and form proper types for them in the type system.
- Parse icky template-ids like 'A<5>' and 'A<(5 > 0)>' properly,
using (sadly) a bool in the parser to tell it whether '>' should
be treated as an operator or not.
This is a baby-step, with major problems and limitations:
- There are currently two ways that we handle template arguments
(whether they are types or expressions). These will be merged, and,
most likely, TemplateArg will disappear.
- We don't have any notion of the declaration of class template
specializations or of template instantiations, so all template-ids
are fancy names for 'int' :)
llvm-svn: 64153
This shrinks OwningResult by one pointer. Since it is no longer larger than OwningPtr, merge the two.
This leads to simpler client code and speeds up my benchmark by 2.7%.
For some reason, this exposes a previously hidden bug, causing a regression in SemaCXX/condition.cpp.
llvm-svn: 63867
.def file for each library. This means that adding a diagnostic
to sema doesn't require all the other libraries to be rebuilt.
Patch by Anders Johnsen!
llvm-svn: 63111
special action, inside function prototype scope. This avoids confusion
when we try to inject these parameters into the scope of the function
body before the function itself has been added to the surrounding
scope. Fixes <rdar://problem/6097326>.
llvm-svn: 62849
that is neither a definition nor a forward declaration and where X has
not yet been declared as a tag, introduce a declaration
into the appropriate scope (which is likely *not* to be the current
scope). The rules for the placement of the declaration differ slightly
in C and C++, so we implement both and test the various corner
cases. This implementation isn't 100% correct due to some lingering
issues with the function prototype scope (for a function parameter
list) not being the same scope as the scope of the function
definition. Testcase is FIXME'd; this probably isn't an important issue.
Addresses <rdar://problem/6484805>.
llvm-svn: 62014
verified to be simple type specifiers, so there is no need for it
to call TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeToken.
Make MaybeParseCXXScopeSpecifier reject ::new and ::delete with a
hard error now that it may never be transitively called in a
context where these are legal. This allows me to start
disentangling things more.
llvm-svn: 61659
become useful or correct until we (1) parse template arguments
correctly, (2) have some way to turn template-ids into types,
declarators, etc., and (3) have a real representation of templates.
llvm-svn: 61208
parameters, with some semantic analysis:
- Template parameters are introduced into template parameter scope
- Complain about template parameter shadowing (except in Microsoft mode)
Note that we leak template parameter declarations like crazy, a
problem we'll remedy once we actually create proper declarations for
templates.
Next up: dependent types and value-dependent/type-dependent
expressions.
llvm-svn: 60597
-Change Parser::ParseCXXScopeSpecifier to MaybeParseCXXScopeSpecifier
-Remove Parser::isTokenCXXScopeSpecifier and fold it into MaybeParseCXXScopeSpecifier
-Rename Parser::TryAnnotateScopeToken to TryAnnotateCXXScopeToken and only allow it to be called when in C++
llvm-svn: 60117
one for building up the diagnostic that is in flight (DiagnosticBuilder)
and one for pulling structured information out of the diagnostic when
formatting and presenting it.
There is no functionality change with this patch.
llvm-svn: 59849
With this snippet:
void f(a::b);
An assert is hit:
Assertion failed: CachedTokens[CachedLexPos-1].getLocation() == Tok.getAnnotationEndLoc() && "The annotation should be until the most recent cached token", file ..\..\lib\Lex\PPCaching.cpp, line 98
Introduce Preprocessor::RevertCachedTokens that reverts a specific number of tokens when backtracking is enabled.
llvm-svn: 59636
and let the clients push whatever they want into the DiagnosticInfo
instead of hard coding a few forms. Also switch various clients to
use Diag(Tok, ...) instead of Diag(Tok.getLocation(), ...) as the
canonical form to simplify the code a bit.
llvm-svn: 59509
are formed. In particular, a diagnostic with all its strings and ranges is now
packaged up and sent to DiagnosticClients as a DiagnosticInfo instead of as a
ton of random stuff. This has the benefit of simplifying the interface, making
it more extensible, and allowing us to do more checking for things like access
past the end of the various arrays passed in.
In addition to introducing DiagnosticInfo, this also substantially changes how
Diagnostic::Report works. Instead of being passed in all of the info required
to issue a diagnostic, Report now takes only the required info (a location and
ID) and returns a fresh DiagnosticInfo *by value*. The caller is then free to
stuff strings and ranges into the DiagnosticInfo with the << operator. When
the dtor runs on the DiagnosticInfo object (which should happen at the end of
the statement), the diagnostic is actually emitted with all of the accumulated
information. This is a somewhat tricky dance, but it means that the
accumulated DiagnosticInfo is allowed to keep pointers to other expression
temporaries without those pointers getting invalidated.
This is just the minimal change to get this stuff working, but this will allow
us to eliminate the zillions of variant "Diag" methods scattered throughout
(e.g.) sema. For example, instead of calling:
Diag(BuiltinLoc, diag::err_overload_no_match, typeNames,
SourceRange(BuiltinLoc, RParenLoc));
We will soon be able to just do:
Diag(BuiltinLoc, diag::err_overload_no_match)
<< typeNames << SourceRange(BuiltinLoc, RParenLoc));
This scales better to support arbitrary types being passed in (not just
strings) in a type-safe way. Go operator overloading?!
llvm-svn: 59502
strings instead of array of strings. This reduces string copying
in some not-very-important cases, but paves the way for future
improvements.
llvm-svn: 59494
destructors, and conversion functions. The placeholders were used to
work around the fact that the parser and some of Sema really wanted
declarators to have simple identifiers; now, the code that deals with
declarators will use DeclarationNames.
llvm-svn: 59469
This is how this kind of initializers appear in the AST:
-The Init expression of the VarDecl is a functional type construction (of the VarDecl's type).
-The new VarDecl::hasCXXDirectInitializer() returns true.
e.g, for "int x(1);":
-VarDecl 'x' has Init with expression "int(1)" (CXXFunctionalCastExpr).
-hasCXXDirectInitializer() of VarDecl 'x' returns true.
A major benefit is that clients that don't particularly care about which exactly form was the initializer can handle both cases without special case code.
Note that codegening works now for "int x(1);" without any changes to CodeGen.
llvm-svn: 57178
- Added as private members for each because it is not clear where to
put the common definition. Perhaps the IdentifierInfos all of these
"pseudo-keywords" should be collected into one place (this would
KnownFunctionIDs and Objective-C property IDs, for example).
Remove Token::isNamedIdentifier.
- There isn't a good reason to use strcmp when we have interned
strings, and there isn't a good reason to encourage clients to do
so.
llvm-svn: 54794
- ActOnDeclarator now takes an additional parameter which is the
AsmLabel if used. Its unfortunate that this bubbles up this high,
but we cannot just lump it in as an attribute without mistakenly
*accepting* it as an attribute.
- The actual asm-label itself is, however, encoded as an AsmLabelAttr
on the FunctionDecl.
- Slightly improved parser error recovery on malformed asm-labels.
- CodeGen support still missing...
llvm-svn: 54339
Note that Parser::ParseCXXMemberSpecification is temporarily disabled until the Sema support is in place.
Once ParseCXXMemberSpecification is enabled, the Parser/cxx-class.cpp test will pass.
llvm-svn: 52694
extend beyond the end of the function.
I'm not completely sure this is the right way to fix this bug, so
someone familiar with the parser should double-check.
llvm-svn: 51311
lib dir and move all the libraries into it. This follows the main
llvm tree, and allows the libraries to be built in parallel. The
top level now enforces that all the libs are built before Driver,
but we don't care what order the libs are built in. This speeds
up parallel builds, particularly incremental ones.
llvm-svn: 48402
John McCall