Summary:
When we have a artificial constructor DIE, we currently create from that a global function with the name of that class.
That ends up causing a bunch of funny errors such as "must use 'struct' tag to refer to type 'Foo' in this scope" when
doing `Foo f`. Also causes that constructing a class via `Foo()` actually just calls that global function.
The fix is that when we have an artificial method decl, we always treat it as handled even if we don't create a CXXMethodDecl
for it (which we never do for artificial methods at the moment).
Fixes rdar://55757491 and probably some other radars.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, shafik
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jingham, shafik, labath, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68130
llvm-svn: 375151
POSIX says FILE is a typedef to a structure containing information about
a file. The structure is unspecified, i.e. it may be an incomplete type, as is the case on musl
(`struct _IO_FILE` is an implementation detail that is not exposed).
`LLDB_RECORD_METHOD(..., (FILE *), ...)` transitively uses sizeof(FILE)
and requires the structure to be complete. Change it to
LLDB_RECORD_DUMMY to fix the build failure on musl (regression of
D57475).
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, labath, lawrence_danna
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68872
llvm-svn: 375072
Now that the VFS knows how to deal with virtual working directories, we
can set the current working directory to the one we recorded during
reproducer capture. This ensures that relative paths are resolved
correctly during replay.
llvm-svn: 375064
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D68549, the actual issue
here seems to be that the BumpPtrAllocator is growing far too slow
because of the 256 different StringPools used as the backend for ConstString.
At the same time the original patch made ConstString allocate memory in
256MiB slabs for the same reason, meaning that the RSS usage of LLDB increased
by a few hundred MiB for all users without bringing any noticeable speedup
for most of them.
llvm-svn: 375062
This patch extends the reproducer to capture the debugger's current
working directory. This information will be used later to set the
current working directory of the VFS.
llvm-svn: 375059
Summary:
ScriptInterpreterPython needs to save and restore sys.stdout and
friends when LLDB runs a python script.
It currently does this using FILE*, which is not optimal. If
whatever was in sys.stdout can not be represented as a FILE*, then
it will not be restored correctly when the script is finished.
It also means that if the debugger's own output stream is not
representable as a file, ScriptInterpreterPython will not be able
to redirect python's output correctly.
This patch updates ScriptInterpreterPython to represent files with
lldb_private::File, and to represent whatever the user had in
sys.stdout as simply a PythonObject.
This will make lldb interoperate better with other scripts or programs
that need to manipulate sys.stdout.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68962
llvm-svn: 374964
Summary:
This patch removes FILE* and replaces it with SBFile and FileSP the
SWIG interface for `SBStream.i`. And this is the last one. With
this change, nothing in the python API will can access a FILE* method
on the C++ side.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68960
llvm-svn: 374924
Summary:
This patch eliminates a bunch of boilerplate from
PythonDataObjects, as well as the use of virtual methods.
In my opinion it also makes the Reset logic a lot more
clear and easy to follow. The price is yet another
template. I think it's worth it.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath, zturner
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68918
llvm-svn: 374916
Summary:
This makes SBFile::GetFile public and adds a SWIG typemap to convert
the result back into a python native file.
If the underlying File itself came from a python file, it is returned
identically. Otherwise a new python file object is created using
the file descriptor.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68737
llvm-svn: 374911
This matches all other architectures listed in the same file.
This fixes debugging aarch64 executables with lldb-server, which
otherwise fails, with log messages like these:
Target::SetArchitecture changing architecture to aarch64 (aarch64-pc-windows-msvc)
Target::SetArchitecture Trying to select executable file architecture aarch64 (aarch64-pc-windows-msvc)
ArchSpec::SetArchitecture sets the vendor to llvm::Triple::PC
for any coff/win32 combination, and if this doesn't match the triple
set by the PECOFF module, things doesn't seem to work with when
using lldb-server.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68939
llvm-svn: 374867
By default `platform process list` only shows the processes of the current user that lldb-server can parse.
There are several problems:
- apk programs don't have an executable file. They instead use a package name as identifier. We should show them instead.
- each apk also runs under a different user. That's how android works
- because of the user permission, some files like /proc/<pid>/{environ,exe} can't be read.
This results in a very small process list.
This is a local run on my machine
```
(lldb) platform process list
2 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
23291 3177 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
23301 23291 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
```
However, I have 700 processes running at this time.
By implementing a few fallbacks for android, I've expanded this list to 202, filtering out kernel processes, which would presumably appear in this list if the device was rooted.
```
(lldb) platform process list
202 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
...
12647 3208 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
12649 12647 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
12653 982 com.samsung.faceservice
13185 982 com.samsung.vvm
15899 982 com.samsung.android.spay
16220 982 com.sec.spp.push
17126 982 com.sec.spp.push:RemoteDlcProcess
19772 983 com.android.chrome
20209 982 com.samsung.cmh:CMH
20380 982 com.google.android.inputmethod.latin
20879 982 com.samsung.android.oneconnect:Receiver
21212 983 com.tencent.mm
24459 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android wpa_supplicant
25974 982 com.samsung.android.contacts
26293 982 com.samsung.android.messaging
28714 982 com.samsung.android.dialer
31605 982 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32256 982 com.bezobidny
```
Something to notice is that the architecture is unkonwn for all apks. And that's fine, because run-as would be required to gather this information and that would make this entire functionality massively slow.
There are still several improvements to make here, like displaying actual user names, which I'll try to do in a following diff.
Note: Regarding overall apk debugging support from lldb. I'm planning on having lldb spawn lldb-server by itself with the correct user, so that everything works well. The initial lldb-server used for connecting to the remote platform can be reused for such purpose. Furthermore, eventually lldb could also launch that initial lldb-server on its own.
Differential Revision: D68289
llvm-svn: 374853
oops! I cherry-picked rL374820 thinking it was completely
independent of D68737, but it wasn't. It makes an incidental
use of SBFile::GetFile, which is introduced there, so I broke the
build.
The docs say you can commit without review for "obvious". I think
this qualifies. If this kind of fix isn't considered obvious, let
me know and I'll revert instead.
Fixes: rL374820
llvm-svn: 374825
Summary:
This patch replaces the FILE* python bindings for SBInstruction and
SBInstructionList and replaces them with the new, safe SBFile and FileSP
bindings.
I also re-enable `Test_Disassemble_VST1_64`, because now we can use
the file bindings as an additional test of the disassembler, and we
can use the disassembler test as a test of the file bindings.
The bugs referred to in the comments appear to have been fixed. The
radar is closed now and the bugzilla bug does not reproduce with the
instructions given.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68890
llvm-svn: 374820
Summary:
This patch re-types everywhere that passes a File::OpenOptions
as a uint32_t so it actually uses File::OpenOptions.
It also converts some OpenOptions related functions that fail
by returning 0 or NULL into llvm::Expected
split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D68737
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68853
llvm-svn: 374817
Summary:
This patch adds FileSP and SBFile versions of the API methods
ReportEventState and HandleProcessEvent. It points the SWIG
wrappers at these instead of the ones that use FILE* streams.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68546
llvm-svn: 374816
The DWARFExpression is parsing the location lists in about five places.
Of those, only one actually had proper support for base address
selection entries.
Since r374600, llvm has started to produce location expressions with
base address selection entries more aggresively, which caused some tests
to fail.
This patch adds support for these entries to the places which had it
missing, fixing the failing tests. It also adds a targeted test for the
two of the three fixes, which should continue testing this functionality
even if the llvm output changes. I am not aware of a way to write a
targeted test for the third fix (DWARFExpression::Evaluate).
llvm-svn: 374769
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374631
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374626
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374622
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374620
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374609
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 374584
BumpPtrAllocator allocates in 4KiB chunks, which with any larger
project is going to result in a large number of allocations.
Increasing allocation size this way can save 10%-20% of symbol
load time for a huge C++ project with correctly built debuginfo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68549
llvm-svn: 374583
Summary:
IOHandler needs to read lines of input from a lldb::File.
The way it currently does this using, FILE*, which is something
we want to avoid now. I'd prefer to just replace the FILE* code
with calls to File::Read, but it contains an awkward and
delicate workaround specific to ctrl-C handling on windows, and
it's not clear if or how that workaround would translate to
lldb::File.
So in this patch, we use use the FILE* if it's available, and only
fall back on File::Read if that's the only option.
I think this is a reasonable approach here for two reasons. First
is that interactive terminal support is the one area where FILE*
can't be avoided. We need them for libedit and curses anyway,
and using them here as well is consistent with that pattern.
The second reason is that the comments express a hope that the
underlying windows bug that's being worked around will be fixed one
day, so hopefully when that happens, that whole path can be deleted.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath, lanza
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68622
llvm-svn: 374576
Summary:
Currently when invoking lldb-test symbols -dump-ast it parses all the debug symbols and calls print(...) on the TranslationUnitDecl.
While useful the TranslationUnitDecl::print(...) method gives us a higher level view then the dump from ASTDumper which is what we get when we invoke dump() on a specific AST node.
The main motivation for this change is allow us to verify that the AST nodes we create when we parse DWARF. For example in order to verify we are correctly using DIFlagExportSymbols added by D66667
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67994
llvm-svn: 374570
Summary:
The previous attempt at making nameless process not match when searching for a
given name failed because the macos implementation was depending on this detail
in its partial matching strategy. Doing partial matching to avoid expensive
lookups is a perfectly valid thing to do, the way it was implemented seems
somewhat unexpected.
This patch implements it differently by providing special
methods in the ProcessInstanceInfoMatch which match only a subset of fields,
and changes mac host code to use those instead.
Then, it re-applies r373925 to get make the ProcessInstanceInfoMatch with a
name *not* match a nameless process.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, teemperor, jingham
Subscribers: wallace, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68631
llvm-svn: 374529
This patch adds an implementation of unwinding using PE EH info. It allows to
get almost ideal call stacks on 64-bit Windows systems (except some epilogue
cases, but I believe that they can be fixed with unwind plan disassembly
augmentation in the future).
To achieve the goal the CallFrameInfo abstraction was made. It is based on the
DWARFCallFrameInfo class interface with a few changes to make it less
DWARF-specific.
To implement the new interface for PECOFF object files the class PECallFrameInfo
was written. It uses the next helper classes:
- UnwindCodesIterator helps to iterate through UnwindCode structures (and
processes chained infos transparently);
- EHProgramBuilder with the use of UnwindCodesIterator constructs EHProgram;
- EHProgram is, by fact, a vector of EHInstructions. It creates an abstraction
over the low-level unwind codes and simplifies work with them. It contains
only the information that is relevant to unwinding in the unified form. Also
the required unwind codes are read from the object file only once with it;
- EHProgramRange allows to take a range of EHProgram and to build an unwind row
for it.
So, PECallFrameInfo builds the EHProgram with EHProgramBuilder, takes the ranges
corresponding to every offset in prologue and builds the rows of the resulted
unwind plan. The resulted plan covers the whole range of the function except the
epilogue.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, asmith, amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, stella.stamenova, labath, espindola
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: leonid.mashinskiy, emaste, mgorny, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67347
llvm-svn: 374528
We currently don't handle the error in the Expected we get
when searching for an equal local DeclContext. Usually this can't
happen as this would require that we have a STL container and
we can find libc++'s std module, but when we load the module in
the expression parser the module doesn't even contain the 'std'
namespace. The only way I see to test this is by having a fake
'std' module that requires a special define to actually provide
its contents, while it will just be empty (that is, it doesn't
even contain the 'std' namespace) without that define. LLDB currently
doesn't know about that define in the expression parser, so it
will load the wrong 'empty' module which should trigger this error.
Also removed the 'auto' for that variable as the function name
doesn't make it obvious that this is an expected and not just
a optional/ptr (which is how this slipped in from the start).
llvm-svn: 374525
Raphael Isemann