have an alloca or a parameter, since then the alloca test should make sense
to readers, while before it probably appears too specific. No functionality
change.
llvm-svn: 165306
The internal representation of the Attributes class will be opaque. All of the
query methods will need to query the opaque class. Therefore, these methods need
to be out-of-line.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 165305
It is now a regex command alias that more faithfully emulates gdb's
behavior, most importantly, "bt 5" will backtrace 5 frames of the
currently selected thread. "bt all" still backtraces all threads
(unlike gdb) and for users who have learned to use "bt -c 5", that
form is still accepted.
llvm-svn: 165300
often hear feedback from people that having the lldb commands on
the left hand side is non-intuitive -- they say "I want a *gdb* to
*lldb* table, not a *lldb* to *gdb* table". It doesn't seem odious
to go from the right-hand column to the left hand column but I've
heard this same feedback enough that it's also pointless to keep
the format lldb-first, gdb-second when it was an arbitrary choice
to begin with.
llvm-svn: 165294
This document describes how to set up LLVM-style RTTI for a class
hierarchy. Surprisingly, this was not previously documented.
Also, link it into ProgrammersManual.html.
llvm-svn: 165293
This is a mechanical change of dynamic_cast<> to dyn_cast<>. A number of
these uses are actually more like isa<> or cast<>, and will be changed
to the semanticaly appropriate one in a future patch.
llvm-svn: 165291
are in fact identity operations. We detect these and kill their
partitions so that even splitting is unaffected by them. This is
particularly important because Clang relies on emitting identity memcpy
operations for struct copies, and these fold away to constants very
often after inlining.
Fixes the last big performance FIXME I have on my plate.
llvm-svn: 165285
the rewrite visitor to make the fact that the speculation is completely
independent a bit more clear.
I promise that this is just a cut/paste of the one visitor and adding
the annonymous namespace wrappings. The diff may look completely
preposterous, it does in git for some reason.
llvm-svn: 165284
This appears to be consistent with GCC's implementation of the same warning
under -Wparentheses. Suppressing a << b + c for cases where 'a' is a user
defined type for compatibility with C++ stream IO. Otherwise suggest
parentheses around the addition or subtraction subexpression.
(this came up when MSVC was complaining (incorrectly, so far as I can tell)
about a perceived violation of this within the LLVM codebase, PR14001)
llvm-svn: 165283
- outside C++, return undef (behavior is not undefined unless the value is used)
- in C++, with -fcatch-undefined-behavior, perform an appropriate trap
- in C++, produce an 'unreachable' (behavior is undefined immediately)
llvm-svn: 165273
enabled after we'd found a few bugs that were caused by shadowed
local variables; the most important issue this turned up was
a common mistake of trying to obtain a mutex lock for the scope
of a code block by doing
Mutex::Locker(m_map_mutex);
This doesn't assign the lock object to a local variable; it is
a temporary that has its dtor called immediately. Instead,
Mutex::Locker locker(m_map_mutex);
does what is intended. For some reason -Wshadow happened to
highlight these as shadowed variables.
I also fixed a few obivous and easy shadowed variable issues
across the code base but there are a couple dozen more that
should be fixed when someone has a free minute.
<rdar://problem/12437585>
llvm-svn: 165269
a non-inline namespace, then reopens it as inline to try to add its symbols to
the surrounding namespace. In this one special case, permit the namespace to be
reopened as inline, and patch up the name lookup tables to match.
llvm-svn: 165263
Sid Manning