CLANG_TOOLS_DIR holds the the current bin/ directory, maybe with a %(build_mode)
placeholder. It is used to add the just-built binaries to $PATH for lit tests.
In most cases it equals LLVM_TOOLS_DIR, which is used for the same purpose.
But for a standalone build of clang, CLANG_TOOLS_DIR points at the build tree
and LLVM_TOOLS_DIR points at the provided LLVM binaries.
Currently CLANG_TOOLS_DIR is set in clang/test/, clang-tools-extra/test/, and
other things always built with clang. This is a few cryptic lines of CMake in
each place. Meanwhile LLVM_TOOLS_DIR is provided by configure_site_lit_cfg().
This patch moves CLANG_TOOLS_DIR to configure_site_lit_cfg() and renames it:
- there's nothing clang-specific about the value
- it will also replace LLD_TOOLS_DIR, LLDB_TOOLS_DIR etc (not in this patch)
It also defines CURRENT_LIBS_DIR. While I removed the last usage of
CLANG_LIBS_DIR in e4cab4e24d, there are LLD_LIBS_DIR usages etc that
may be live, and I'd like to mechanically update them in a followup patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121763
This replaces a bunch of duplicate logic to set up environment variables
and a few substitutions.
It does a little more than we were doing previously:
- searching for clang and setting up substitutions for it
- setting up some substitutions for target triples, which are
potentially useful but not actually used
clangd has been happily using this for its tests for a while.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121422
A version of this logic appears in ~every lit.site.cfg.in (28 copies total).
This patch just removes two, but I'll update the rest of llvm-project next.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121427
This clarifies that this is an LLVM specific variable and avoids
potential conflicts with other projects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119918
Ensure CLANG_PLUGIN_SUPPORT is compatible with llvm_add_library.
Fixes an issue noted in D111100.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119199
This reverts commit 36892727e4 which
breaks the build when LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY is enabled with:
CMake Error at cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:683 (add_dependencies):
The dependency target "clang-tidy-headers" of target "CTTestTidyModule"
does not exist.
LIBCLANG_INCLUDE_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA causes clang-tools-extra tools
to be included in libclang, which caused a dependency cycle. The option
has been off by default for two releases now, and (based on a web search
and mailing list feedback) nobody seems to turn it on. Remove it, like
planned on https://reviews.llvm.org/D79599
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97693
Instead of using CLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER for use of the
static analyzer in both clang and clang-tidy, add a second
toggle CLANG_TIDY_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER.
This allows enabling the static analyzer in clang-tidy while
disabling it in clang.
Differential Revison: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87118
This is primarily motivated by the desire to move from Python2 to
Python3. `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` is ambiguous. This explicitly identifies
the python interpreter in use. Since the LLVM build seems to be able to
completed successfully with python3, use that across the build. The old
path aliases `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` to be treated as Python3.
This is primarily motivated by the desire to move from Python2 to
Python3. `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` is ambiguous. This explicitly identifies
the python interpreter in use. Since the LLVM build seems to be able to
completed successfully with python3, use that across the build. The old
path aliases `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` to be treated as Python3.
D61187 didn't delete config.clangd_xpc_support from test/
CLANGD_BUILD_XPC is defined in clangd/CMakeLists.txt and not available in test/lit.site.cfg.py.in
llvm-svn: 359428
The CMake variable controlling if XPC code is built is called
CLANGD_BUILD_XPC but three places unintentionally checked the
non-existent variable CLANGD_BUILD_XPC_SUPPORT instead, which (due to
being nonexistent, and due to cmake) always silently evaluated to false.
Luckily the test still seems to pass, despite never running after being
added almost 3 months ago in r351280.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60120
llvm-svn: 357719
Sam McCall