Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
The default value for this option (UseMCJITReplacement) is already false, and
OrcMCJITReplacement is going to have deprecation warnings attached in LLVM 9.0.
Removing this call removes a spurious warning.
llvm-svn: 366141
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This library was breaking my -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=1 build. rC348915 seemed to miss this case.
As this seems an "obvious" fix, I am committing without pre-commit review as
per the LLVM developer policy.
llvm-svn: 348929
Summary: Added commands to Dockerfile to build llvm-proto-fuzzer and the other related tools. Also added a section to the bottom of the README describing what llvm-proto-fuzzer does and how to run it.
Reviewers: morehouse, kcc
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50829
llvm-svn: 339933
Summary: Extended `cxx_loop_proto` to have neste for loops. Modified `loop_proto_to_llvm` and `loop_proto_to_cxx` to handle the new protos. All protos have a set of statements designated as "inner loop" statements and a set of statements designated as "outer loop" statements.
Reviewers: morehouse, kcc
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50670
llvm-svn: 339832
Summary: Edited `loop_proto_to_llvm` to emit metadata at the end of the generated IR. This metadata will increase the vector width when the IR is optimized.
Reviewers: morehouse, kcc
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50530
llvm-svn: 339392
Summary: I noticed that my code wasn't going deep into the loop vectorizer code so added another pass that makes it go further.
Reviewers: morehouse, kcc
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50482
llvm-svn: 339305
Summary: Changed the structure of the generated IR to make it easier to vectorize
Reviewers: morehouse, kcc
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50342
llvm-svn: 339080
Summary:
Added corpus of arrays to use as inputs for the functions. Check that the two
functions modify the inputted arrays in the same way.
Reviewers: kcc, morehouse
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50194
llvm-svn: 338943
Summary:
Made changes to the llvm-proto-fuzzer
- Added loop vectorizer optimization pass in order to have two IR versions
- Updated old fuzz target to handle two different IR versions
- Wrote code to execute both versions in memory
Reviewers: morehouse, kcc, alexshap
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: pcc, mgorny, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49526
llvm-svn: 338077
Changed the function signature and removed conditionals from loop body.
Patch By: emmettneyman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47964
llvm-svn: 334421
Edited loop_proto and its converter to make more "vectorizable" code
according to kcc's comment in D47666
- Removed all while loops
- Can only index into array with induction variable
Patch By: emmettneyman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47920
llvm-svn: 334252
Summary:
Created a new protobuf and protobuf-to-C++ "converter" that wraps the entire C++ code in a single for loop.
- Slightly changed cxx_proto.proto -> cxx_loop_proto.proto
- Made some changes to proto_to_cxx files to handle the new kind of protobuf
- Created ExampleClangLoopProtoFuzzer to test new protobuf and "converter"
Patch by Emmett Neyman
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka, morehouse
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, morehouse
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47843
llvm-svn: 334216
Copied and renamed some files in preparation for new loop-proto-fuzzer.
Patch By: emmettneyman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47666
llvm-svn: 333969
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
libprotobuf-mutator accepts protobufs with missing fields, which means
clang-proto-fuzzer does as well. clang-proto-to-cxx should match this
behavior.
llvm-svn: 324132
We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.
Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.
Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).
Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823
llvm-svn: 319840
Summary:
Compile with DummyClangFuzzer.cpp as entry point rather than
libFuzzer's main when coverage instrumentation is missing.
https://llvm.org/pr34314
Reviewers: kcc, bogner, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38642
llvm-svn: 315336
Summary:
Arguments can be specified after -ignore_remaining_args=1 to modify
the compiler invocation. For example, the following command-line
will fuzz LLVM with a custom optimization level and target triple:
clang-proto-fuzzer CORPUS/ -ignore_remaining_args -O3 \
-triple arm64-apple-ios9
Reviewers: vitalybuka, kcc
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: aemerson, cfe-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36882
llvm-svn: 311185
Summary:
The clang-proto-fuzzer models a subset of C++ as a protobuf and
uses libprotobuf-mutator to generate interesting mutations of C++
programs. Clang-proto-fuzzer has already found several bugs in
Clang (e.g., https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33747,
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33749).
As with clang-fuzzer, clang-proto-fuzzer requires the following
cmake flags:
- CMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang
- CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++
- LLVM_USE_SANITIZE_COVERAGE=YES // needed for libFuzzer
- LLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address // needed for libFuzzer
In addition, clang-proto-fuzzer requires:
- CLANG_ENABLE_PROTO_FUZZER=ON
clang-proto-fuzzer also requires the following dependencies:
- binutils // needed for libprotobuf-mutator
- liblzma-dev // needed for libprotobuf-mutator
- libz-dev // needed for libprotobuf-mutator
- docbook2x // needed for libprotobuf-mutator
- Recent version of protobuf [3.3.0 is known to work]
A working version of libprotobuf-mutator will automatically be
downloaded and built as an external project.
Implementation of clang-proto-fuzzer provided by Kostya
Serebryany.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33829
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka, bogner
Reviewed By: kcc, vitalybuka
Subscribers: thakis, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36324
llvm-svn: 310408
Jonas Devlieghere