Instead of passing around fast-math-flags as a parameter, we can set those
using an IRBuilder guard object. This is no-functional-change-intended.
The motivation is to eventually fix the vectorizers to use and set the
correct fast-math-flags for reductions. Examples of that not behaving as
expected are:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23116 (should be able to reduce with less than 'fast')
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35538 (possible miscompile for -0.0)
D61802 (should be able to reduce with IR-level FMF)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62272
llvm-svn: 362612
Change from original commit: move test (that uses an X86 triple) into the X86
subdirectory.
Original description:
Gating vectorizing reductions on *all* fastmath flags seems unnecessary;
`reassoc` should be sufficient.
Reviewers: tvvikram, mkuper, kristof.beyls, sdesmalen, Ayal
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: dcaballe, huntergr, jmolloy, mcrosier, jlebar, bixia, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57728
llvm-svn: 355889
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Without the fast math flags, the llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.fadd/fmul intrinsic expansions must be expanded in order.
This patch scalarizes the reduction, applying the accumulator at the start of the sequence: ((((Acc + Scl[0]) + Scl[1]) + Scl[2]) + ) ... + Scl[NumElts-1]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45366
llvm-svn: 329585
As discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107104.html
and again more recently:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118118.html
...this is a step in cleaning up our fast-math-flags implementation in IR to better match
the capabilities of both clang's user-visible flags and the backend's flags for SDNode.
As proposed in the above threads, we're replacing the 'UnsafeAlgebra' bit (which had the
'umbrella' meaning that all flags are set) with a new bit that only applies to algebraic
reassociation - 'AllowReassoc'.
We're also adding a bit to allow approximations for library functions called 'ApproxFunc'
(this was initially proposed as 'libm' or similar).
...and we're out of bits. 7 bits ought to be enough for anyone, right? :) FWIW, I did
look at getting this out of SubclassOptionalData via SubclassData (spacious 16-bits),
but that's apparently already used for other purposes. Also, I don't think we can just
add a field to FPMathOperator because Operator is not intended to be instantiated.
We'll defer movement of FMF to another day.
We keep the 'fast' keyword. I thought about removing that, but seeing IR like this:
%f.fast = fadd reassoc nnan ninf nsz arcp contract afn float %op1, %op2
...made me think we want to keep the shortcut synonym.
Finally, this change is binary incompatible with existing IR as seen in the
compatibility tests. This statement:
"Newer releases can ignore features from older releases, but they cannot miscompile
them. For example, if nsw is ever replaced with something else, dropping it would be
a valid way to upgrade the IR."
( http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#ir-backwards-compatibility )
...provides the flexibility we want to make this change without requiring a new IR
version. Ie, we're not loosening the FP strictness of existing IR. At worst, we will
fail to optimize some previously 'fast' code because it's no longer recognized as
'fast'. This should get fixed as we audit/squash all of the uses of 'isFast()'.
Note: an inter-dependent clang commit to use the new API name should closely follow
commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39304
llvm-svn: 317488
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
This pass uses a new target hook to decide whether or not to expand a particular
intrinsic to the shuffevector sequence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32245
llvm-svn: 302631
Sanjay Patel