Some jobs might not produce those, but it makes the blocks easier to
copy-paste and makes sure that if a job does produce an ABI list, it
will be updloaded in the artifacts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120056
Also apply the same fix on glibc. This takes the test one step closer
to passing on glibc, but it still fails on the zh_CN test (which
requires a more involved fix in libc++ itself).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119791
Expect the same NAN formatting on Windows as on Glibc. (Both MSVC and
MinGW produce the same formatting there.)
The hex float formatting tests pass on MinGW, so opt in to those tests.
Document exactly what issues are remaining in Clang-cl/MSVC
configurations. (It's easily possible to make the tests pass there too,
but it requires a whole lot of small-scope ifndefs in the test file;
around 60 ifdefs in total for those both test files. Those could
be avoided if the CI environment could run with a newer version
of UCRT, but that's nontrivial to fix right away.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119766
This patch upstreams some changes we've made internally to how we're
building the libc++ dylib on Apple platforms. The goal is still to
eventually get rid of `apple-install-libcxx.sh` entirely and have a
proper way to mirror what we do internally with just the normal CMake
configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118912
This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769
It actually *is* important (for structured bindings) that `get(tuple)`
be ADL-able; but that's not the point of this test in particular.
Reviewed as part of D119860.
We shouldn't be calling `rethrow_exception` via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not like we need to test
this ADL ability of `rethrow_exception` in particular.
Reviewed as part of D119860.
We shouldn't be calling these functions via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not like we need to test
the ADL ability of these functions in particular.
Reviewed as part of D119860.
We shouldn't be calling `prev` via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not like we need to test
this ADL ability of `prev` in particular.
Reviewed as part of D119860.
We shouldn't be calling `next` via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not like we need to test
this ADL ability of `next` in particular.
Reviewed as part of D119860.
We shouldn't be calling `move` via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not like we need to test
this ADL ability of `move` in particular.
Reviewed as part of D119860.
The changes from the One Ranges Proposal amount to adding:
- a constructor that takes a `default_sentinel_t` and is equivalent to
the default constructor;
- an `operator==` that compares the iterator to `default_sentinel_t`.
The original proposal defined two overloads for `operator==` (different
argument order) as well as `operator!=`. This has been removed by
[P1614](https://wg21.link/p1614).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119620
I'm trying to get libc++ to the point of being able to run clang-tidy. This is a PR to see if clang-tidy is happy with all the CI configs.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc
Spies: mgorny, aheejin, libcxx-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117174
We shouldn't be calling `distance` via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not like we need to test
this ADL ability of `distance` in particular.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119685
This change will make it possible to track exported symbols in more
configurations, notably the Apple system one, where we disable incomplete
features and the debug mode. Also, as a fly-by fix, shorten the name for
whether new is in libc++ or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119764
Also, fix the actual code so that the test would pass if we fixed the
issue that the method is instantiated in the dylib, and hence the debug
assertion will never fire except if the debug mode is enabled when the
dylib is being compiled.
Our best guess is that the two syntaxes should have exactly equivalent
effects, so, let's be consistent with what we do in libcxx/include/.
I've left `#include "include/x.h"` and `#include "../y.h"` alone
because I'm less sure that they're interchangeable, and they aren't
inconsistent with libcxx/include/ because libcxx/include/ never
does that kind of thing.
Also, use the `_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS/POP_MACROS` dance for `<__undef_macros>`,
even though it's technically unnecessary in a standalone .cpp file,
just so we have consistently one way to do it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119561
This should work now that we are using a matching libunwind.dylib when
we run the tests in back-deployment scenarios. The only restriction we
have now is to run on macOS x86_64, since that's what the old dylibs
were compiled for. This should allow us to move to newer AppleClangs
in the CI.
As a fly-by, fix missing availability annotations on optional's
monadic operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119840
As suggested in D117966.
These conditional noexcepts are *permitted* by the Standard (as long
as there were no mistakes in them, I guess); but not *mandated*.
The Standard doesn't put any noexcept-specifications on these member functions.
The same logic would apply to `transform_view::iterator::operator*`
and `transform_view::iterator::operator[]`, but the Standard mandates
conditional noexcept on `iter_move(transform_view::iterator)`, and
I think it doesn't make much sense to say "moving from this iterator
is conditionally noexcept but not-moving from it is noexcept(false),"
so I'm leaving transform_view alone for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119374
In src/, most files can use `constinit` directly because they're always
compiled with C++20. But some files, like "libcxxabi/src/fallback_malloc.cpp",
can't, because they're `#include`d directly from test cases in libcxxabi/test/
and therefore must (currently) compile as C++03. We might consider refactoring
those offending tests, or at least marking them `UNSUPPORTED: c++03`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119264
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
The test would trigger -Wtautological-compare. I think that the little
we gain from comparing addresses isn't worth the added complexity to
work around the warning.
Summary:
The pragma priority guarded for AIX in locale.cpp is no longer useful and is ignored by the current AIX build compilers. This patch removes it from the source.
Reviewed by: ldionne, hubert.reinterpretcast, libc++
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119765
This makes the GCC output even cleaner!
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: mstorsjo, Quuxplusone, Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119295
Nikolas Klauser