Summary:
This patch implements [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]p8:
> The unqualified-id get_return_object_on_allocation_failure is looked up in the scope of
> class P by class member access lookup (3.4.5). If a declaration is found, ..., and if a
> global allocation function is selected, the ::operator new(size_t, nothrow_t) form shall be used.
> [...]
> The allocation function used in this case must have a non-throwing noexcept-specification.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith, majnemer, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31562
llvm-svn: 300420
This reverts an attempt to check that types match when matching a
dependently-typed non-type template parameter. (This comes up when matching the
parameters of a template template parameter against the parameters of a
template template argument.)
The matching rules here are murky at best. Our behavior after this revert is
definitely wrong for certain C++17 features (for 'auto' template parameter
types within the parameter list of a template template argument in particular),
but our behavior before this revert is wrong for some pre-existing testcases,
so reverting to our prior behavior seems like our best option.
llvm-svn: 300262
We need to address cases (breaking libc++) such as
template <class _Up> static int __test(...);
template<typename _Tp>
auto v = __test<_Tp>(0);
llvm-svn: 299956
Follow-up to r299363 "Enhance -Wshadow to warn when shadowing typedefs or type
aliases".
Patch by Ahmed Asadi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31235
llvm-svn: 299522
Summary:
Certain implicitly generated coroutine statements, such as the calls to 'return_value()' or `return_void()` or `get_return_object_on_allocation_failure()`, cannot be built until the promise type is no longer dependent. This means they are not built until after the coroutine body statement has been transformed.
This patch fixes an issue where these statements would never be built for coroutine templates.
It also fixes a small issue where diagnostics about `get_return_object_on_allocation_failure()` were incorrectly suppressed.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31487
llvm-svn: 299380
GCC has the alloc_align attribute, which is similar to assume_aligned, except the attribute's parameter is the index of the integer parameter that needs aligning to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29599
llvm-svn: 299117
Summary:
If promise_type has get_return_object_on_allocation_failure defined,
check if an allocation function returns nullptr, and if so,
return the result of get_return_object_on_allocation_failure().
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31399
llvm-svn: 298891
Summary:
This patch implements parsing of [[clang::suppress(rule, ...)]]
and [[gsl::suppress(rule, ...)]] attributes.
C++ Core Guidelines depend heavily on tool support for
rule enforcement. They also propose a way to suppress
warnings [1] which is by annotating any ancestor in AST
with the C++11 attribute [[gsl::suppress(rule1,...)]].
To have a mechanism to suppress non-C++ Core
Guidelines specific, an additional spelling of [[clang::suppress]]
is defined.
For example, to suppress the warning cppcoreguidelines-slicing,
one could do
```
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]]
void f() { ... code that does slicing ... }
```
or
```
void g() {
Derived b;
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]]
Base a{b};
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]] {
doSomething();
Base a2{b};
}
}
```
This parsing can then be used by clang-tidy, which includes multiple
C++ Core Guidelines rules, to suppress warnings (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24888).
For the exact naming of the rule in the attribute, there
are different possibilities, which will be defined in the
corresponding clang-tidy patch.
Currently, clang-tidy supports suppressing of warnings through "//
NOLINT" comments. There are some advantages that the attribute has:
- Suppressing specific warnings instead of all warnings
- Suppressing warnings in a block (namespace, function, compound
statement)
- Code formatting may split a statement into multiple lines,
thus a "// NOLINT" comment may be on the wrong line
I'm looking forward to your comments!
[1] https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#inforce-enforcement
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24886
llvm-svn: 298880
for unused values.
This fixes a regression caused by r298676, where constructor calls to
classes with non-trivial dtor were marked as unused if the first
argument is an initializer list. This is inconsistent (as the test
shows) and also warns on a reasonbly common code pattern where people
just call constructors to create and immediately destroy an object.
llvm-svn: 298853
This change fixes a crash on initialization of a reference from ({}) during
template instantiation and incidentally improves diagnostics.
This reverts a prior attempt to handle this in r286721. Instead, we teach the
initialization code that initialization cannot be performed if a source type
is required and the initializer is an initializer list (which is not an
expression and does not have a type), and likewise for function-style cast
expressions.
llvm-svn: 298676
Correct class-template deprecation behavior
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Previous DiffRev: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486, was reverted.
This patch fixes the issues brought up here by the reverter: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31245
llvm-svn: 298634
Summary:
This patch adopts the recent changes that renamed `set_exception(exception_pointer)` to `unhandled_exception()`.
Additionally `unhandled_exception()` is now required, and so an error is emitted when exceptions are enabled but the promise type does not provide the member.
When exceptions are disabled a warning is emitted instead of an error, The warning notes that the `unhandled_exception()` function is required when exceptions are enabled.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman, majnemer
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30859
llvm-svn: 298565
We don't know whether some other instantiation of the template might be able to
reach the annotation, so warning on it has a high chance of false positives.
Patch by Ahmed Asadi!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31069
llvm-svn: 298477
The alias was only ever used on darwin and had some issues there,
and isn't used in practice much. Also fixes a problem with -mno-altivec
not turning off -maltivec.
Also add a diagnostic for faltivec/fno-altivec that directs users to use
maltivec options and include the altivec.h file explicitly.
llvm-svn: 298449
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486
llvm-svn: 298410
This commit adds support for a new attribute that will be used to
distinguish between extensible and inextensible enums. There are three
main purposes of this attribute:
1. Give better control over when enum-related warnings are issued.
For example, in the code below, clang will not issue a -Wassign-enum
warning if the enum is marked "open":
enum __attribute__((enum_extensibility(closed))) EnumClosed {
B0 = 1, B1 = 10
};
enum __attribute__((enum_extensibility(open))) EnumOpen {
C0 = 1, C1 = 10
};
enum EnumClosed ec = 100; // warning issued
enum EnumOpen eo = 100; // no warning
2. Enable code-completion and debugging tools to offer better
suggestions.
3. Make it easier for swift's clang importer to determine which swift
type an enum should be mapped to.
For more details, see the discussion I started on cfe-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-February/052748.html
rdar://problem/12764379
rdar://problem/23145650
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30766
llvm-svn: 298332
This adds -Wbitfield-enum-conversion, which warns on implicit
conversions that happen on bitfield assignment that change the value of
some enumerators.
Values of enum type typically take on a very small range of values, so
they are frequently stored in bitfields. Unfortunately, there is no
convenient way to calculate the minimum number of bits necessary to
store all possible values at compile time, so users usually hard code a
bitwidth that works today and widen it as necessary to pass basic
testing and validation. This is very error-prone, and leads to stale
widths as enums grow. This warning aims to catch such bugs.
This would have found two real bugs in clang and two instances of
questionable code. See r297680 and r297654 for the full description of
the issues.
This warning is currently disabled by default while we investigate its
usefulness outside of LLVM.
The major cause of false positives with this warning is this kind of
enum:
enum E { W, X, Y, Z, SENTINEL_LAST };
The last enumerator is an invalid value used to validate inputs or size
an array. Depending on the prevalance of this style of enum across a
codebase, this warning may be more or less feasible to deploy. It also
has trouble on sentinel values such as ~0U.
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu, thakis
Reviewed By: thakis
Subscribers: hfinkel, voskresensky.vladimir, sashab, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30923
llvm-svn: 297761
Summary:
Some coroutine diagnostics need to point to the location of the first coroutine keyword in the function, like when diagnosing a `return` inside a coroutine. Previously we did this by storing each *valid* coroutine statement in a list and select the first one to use in diagnostics. However if every coroutine statement is invalid we would have no location to point to.
This patch fixes the storage of the first coroutine statement location, ensuring that it gets stored even when the resulting AST node would be invalid.
This patch also removes the `CoroutineStmts` list in `FunctionScopeInfo` because it was unused.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30776
llvm-svn: 297547
Printing typedefs or type aliases using clang_getTypeSpelling() is missing the
namespace they are defined in. This is in contrast to other types that always
yield the full typename including namespaces.
Patch by Michael Reiher!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29944
llvm-svn: 297465
Summary:
A `co_await arg` expression has a dependent type whenever the promise type is still dependent, even if the argument to co_await is not. This is because we cannot attempt the `await_transform(<arg>)` until after we know the promise type.
This patch fixes an assertion in the constructor of `DependentCoawaitExpr` that asserted that `arg` must also be dependent.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30772
llvm-svn: 297358
Summary:
This patch adds passing a coroutine_handle object to await_suspend calls.
It builds the coroutine_handle using coroutine_handle<PromiseType>::from_address(__builtin_coro_frame()).
(a revision of https://reviews.llvm.org/D26316 that for some reason refuses to apply via arc patch)
Reviewers: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30769
llvm-svn: 297356
Summary:
The changes contained in this patch are:
1. Defines a new AST node `CoawaitDependentExpr` for representing co_await expressions while the promise type is still dependent.
2. Correctly detect and transform the 'co_await' operand to `p.await_transform(<expr>)` when possible.
3. Change the initial/final suspend points to build during the initial parse, so they have the correct operator co_await lookup results.
4. Fix transformation of the CoroutineBodyStmt so that it doesn't re-build the final/initial suspends.
@rsmith: This change is a little big, but it's not trivial for me to split it up. Please let me know if you would prefer this submitted as multiple patches.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: ABataev, rsmith, mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26057
llvm-svn: 297093
Previously when a coroutine was building the implicit setup/destroy
constructs it would emit diagostics about failures on the first co_await/co_return/co_yield
it encountered. This was confusing because that construct may not itself be ill-formed.
This patch moves the diagnostics to the function start instead.
llvm-svn: 297089
Summary:
Don't warn about unused lambda captures that involve copying a
value of a type that cannot be trivially copied and destroyed.
Fixes PR31977
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30327
llvm-svn: 296602
The exisiting warning for inconsistent overrides does not include the destructor
as it was noted in review that it was too noisy. Instead, add to a separate
warning group that is off by default for users who want consistent warnings
between methods and destructors.
llvm-svn: 296572
Essentially, as a base class constructor does not construct virtual bases, such
a constructor for an abstract class does not need the corresponding base class
construction to be valid, and likewise for destructors.
This creates an awkward situation: clang will sometimes generate references to
the complete object and deleting destructors for an abstract class (it puts
them in the construction vtable for a derived class). But we can't generate a
"correct" version of these because we can't generate references to base class
constructors any more (if they're template specializations, say, we might not
have instantiated them and can't assume any other TU will emit a copy).
Fortunately, we don't need to, since no correct program can ever invoke them,
so instead emit symbols that just trap.
We should stop emitting references to these symbols, but still need to emit
definitions for compatibility.
llvm-svn: 296275
Rather than attempting to compare whether the previous and current top of
context stack are "equal" (which fails for a number of reasons, such as the
context stack entries containing pointers to objects on the stack, or reaching
the same "top of stack" entry through two different paths), track the depth of
context stack at which we last emitted a note and invalidate it when we pop the
context stack to less than that depth.
This causes us to emit some missing "in instantiation of" notes and to stop
emitting redundant "in instantiation of" stacks matching the previous stack in
rare cases.
llvm-svn: 295921
This is necessary in order for the evaluation of an _Atomic initializer for
those types to have an associated object, which an initializer for class or
array type needs.
llvm-svn: 295886
We need to look through the PackExpansionType in the parameter type when
deducing, and we need to consider the possibility of deducing arguments for
packs that are not lexically mentioned in the pattern (but are nonetheless
deducible) when figuring out which packs are covered by a pack deduction scope.
llvm-svn: 295790
case where the class template has a parameter pack.
Checking of the template arguments expects an "as-written" template argument
list, which in particular does not have any parameter packs. So flatten the
packs into separate arguments before passing them in.
llvm-svn: 295710
template deduction guides for class template argument deduction.
Ensure that we have a local instantiation scope for tracking the instantiated
parameters. Additionally, unusually, we're substituting at depth 1 and leaving
depth 0 alone; make sure that we don't reduce template parameter depth by 2 for
inner parameters in the process. (This is probably also broken for alias
templates in the case where they're expanded within a dependent context, but
this patch doesn't fix that.)
llvm-svn: 295696
Enable evaluation of captures within constexpr lambdas by using a strategy similar to that used in CodeGen:
- when starting evaluation of a lambda's call operator, create a map from VarDecl's to a closure's FieldDecls
- every time a VarDecl (or '*this) that represents a capture is encountered while evaluating the expression via the expression evaluator (specifically the LValueEvaluator) in ExprConstant.cpp - it is replaced by the corresponding FieldDecl LValue (an Lvalue-to-Rvalue conversion on this LValue representation then determines the right rvalue when needed).
Thanks to Richard Smith and Hubert Tong for their review and feedback!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29748
llvm-svn: 295279
guide from a constructor.
The purpose of this change is to avoid triggering instantiation of the class
when substituting back into the deduction guide if it uses a typedef member.
We will still instantiate the class if the constructor (explicitly or
implicitly, directly or indirectly) uses the current instantiation in a way
that we can't canonicalize out, but that seems unavoidable.
llvm-svn: 295016
Different diagnostics when format string does not match
actual arg type.
This commit contains the first 2 of 3 tests reviewed in D29685
llvm-svn: 294979
Summary:
Sema::CheckCompletedCoroutineBody was growing unwieldy with building all of the substatements. Also, constructors for CoroutineBodyStmt had way too many parameters.
Instead, CoroutineBodyStmt now defines CtorArgs structure with all of the required construction parameters.
CheckCompleteCoroutineBody delegates construction of individual substatements to short functions one per each substatement.
Also, added a drive-by fix of initializing CoroutinePromise to nullptr in ScopeInfo.h.
And addressed the FIXME that wanted to tail allocate extra room at the end of the CoroutineBodyStmt to hold parameter move expressions. (The comment was longer that the code that implemented tail allocation).
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28835
llvm-svn: 294933
It's actually meaningful and useful to allow such variables to have no
initializer, but we are strictly following the standard here until the C++
committee reaches consensus on allowing this.
llvm-svn: 294785
nested-name-specifier (as the standard appears to require), treat it as the
type specifier 'decltype(auto)' followed by a nested-name-specifier starting
with '::'.
llvm-svn: 294506
For non-template dllimport functions, MSVC allows providing an inline
definition without spelling out the attribute again. In the example below, f
remains a dllimport function.
__declspec(dllimport) int f();
inline int f() { return 42; }
int useit() {
return f();
}
However, for a function template, not putting dllimport on the redeclaration
causes it to be dropped. In the example below, f is not dllimport.
template <typename> __declspec(dllimport) int f();
template <typename> inline int f() { return 42; }
int useit() {
return f<int>();
}
This patch makes Clang match MSVC for the second example.
MSVC does not warn about the attribute being dropped in the example above, but
I think we should. (MSVC does warn if the inline keyword isn't used.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29152
llvm-svn: 293800
FindInstantiatedDecl or passing it to RebuildMemberExpr.
This fixes PR30361.
rdar://problem/17341274
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24969
llvm-svn: 293678
Don't try to map an APSInt addend to an int64_t in pointer arithmetic before
bounds-checking it. This gives more consistent behavior (outside C++11, we
consistently use 2s complement semantics for both pointer and integer overflow
in constant expressions) and fixes some cases where in C++11 we would fail to
properly check for out-of-bounds pointer arithmetic (if the 2s complement
64-bit overflow landed us back in-bounds).
In passing, also fix some cases where we'd perform possibly-overflowing
arithmetic on CharUnits (which have a signed underlying type) during constant
expression evaluation.
llvm-svn: 293595
This fixes various ways to tickle an assertion in constant expression
evaluation when using __int128. Longer term, we need to figure out what should
happen here: either any kind of overflow in offset calculation should result in
a non-constant value or we should truncate to 64 bits. In C++11 onwards, we're
effectively already checking for overflow because we strictly enforce array
bounds checks, but even there some forms of overflow can slip past undetected.
llvm-svn: 293568
r293360 broke some ARM bots, because size_t on those targets is
apparently `unsigned int`, not `unsigned long`. `sizeof(whatever)`
should to give us a `size_t`, so we can just use the type of that
instead.
llvm-svn: 293369
This patch changes how we handle argument-dependent `diagnose_if`
attributes. In particular, we now check them in the same place that we
check for things like passing NULL to Nonnull args, etc. This is
basically better in every way than how we were handling them before. :)
This fixes PR31638, PR31639, and PR31640.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28889
llvm-svn: 293360
This commit improves the mismatched destructor type error by detecting when the
destructor call has used a '.' instead of a '->' on a pointer to the destructed
type. The diagnostic now suggests to use '->' instead of '.', and adds a fixit
where appropriate.
rdar://28766702
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25817
llvm-svn: 292615
by providing a memchr builtin that returns char* instead of void*.
Also add a __has_feature flag to indicate the presence of constexpr forms of
the relevant <string> functions.
llvm-svn: 292555
Summary:
The warning doesn't know why the variable was looked up but not
odr-used, so reword it to not claim that it was used in an unevaluated
context.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28902
llvm-svn: 292498
CheckDesignatedInitializer wasn't taking into account the base classes
when computing the index for the field in the derived class, which
caused the test case to crash during IRGen because of a malformed AST.
rdar://problem/26795040
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28705
llvm-svn: 292245
Summary:
Warn when a lambda explicitly captures something that is not used in its body.
The warning is part of -Wunused and can be enabled with -Wunused-lambda-capture.
Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman, jbcoe, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28467
llvm-svn: 291905
This commit ensures that clang avoids the redundant -Wshadow warning for
variables that already get a "redefinition of " error.
rdar://29067894
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28350
llvm-svn: 291564
Don't prematurely clean up an RAII object; there's another RAII object in the
same scope that tries to save and restore the same member!
llvm-svn: 291551
Check for implicit conversion sequences for non-dependent function
template parameters between deduction and substitution. The idea is to accept
as many cases as possible, on the basis that substitution failure outside the
immediate context is much more common during substitution than during implicit
conversion sequence formation.
This re-commits r290808, reverted in r290811 and r291412, with a couple of
fixes for handling of explicitly-specified non-trailing template argument
packs.
llvm-svn: 291427
`diagnose_if` can be used to have clang emit either warnings or errors
for function calls that meet user-specified conditions. For example:
```
constexpr int foo(int a)
__attribute__((diagnose_if(a > 10, "configurations with a > 10 are "
"expensive.", "warning")));
int f1 = foo(9);
int f2 = foo(10); // warning: configuration with a > 10 are expensive.
int f3 = foo(f2);
```
It currently only emits diagnostics in cases where the condition is
guaranteed to always be true. So, the following code will emit no
warnings:
```
constexpr int bar(int a) {
foo(a);
return 0;
}
constexpr int i = bar(10);
```
We hope to support optionally emitting diagnostics for cases like that
(and emitting runtime checks) in the future.
Release notes will appear shortly. :)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27424
llvm-svn: 291418
Add a visitor for lambda expressions to RecordExprEvaluator in ExprConstant.cpp that creates an empty APValue of Struct type to represent the closure object. Additionally, add a LambdaExpr visitor to the TemporaryExprEvaluator that forwards constant evaluation of immediately-called-lambda-expressions to the one in RecordExprEvaluator through VisitConstructExpr.
This patch supports:
constexpr auto ID = [] (auto a) { return a; };
static_assert(ID(3.14) == 3.14);
static_assert([](auto a) { return a + 1; }(10) == 11);
Lambda captures are still not supported for constexpr lambdas.
llvm-svn: 291416
Check for implicit conversion sequences for non-dependent function
template parameters between deduction and substitution. The idea is to accept
as many cases as possible, on the basis that substitution failure outside the
immediate context is much more common during substitution than during implicit
conversion sequence formation.
This re-commits r290808, reverted in r290811, with a fix for handling of
explicitly-specified template argument packs.
llvm-svn: 291410
This patch has been sitting in review hell since july 2016 and our lack of constexpr lambda support is getting embarrassing (given that I've had a branch that implements the feature (modulo *this capture) for over a year. While in Issaquah I was enjoying shamelessly trying to convince folks of the lie that this was Richard's fault ;) I won't be able to do so in Kona since I won't be attending - so I'm going to aim to have this feature be implemented by then.
I'm quite confident of the approach in this patch, which simply maps the static-invoker 'thunk' back to the corresponding call-operator (specialization).
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 291397
This implements something like the current direction of DR1581: we use a narrow
syntactic check to determine the set of places where a constant expression
could be evaluated, and only instantiate a constexpr function or variable if
it's referenced in one of those contexts, or is odr-used.
It's not yet clear whether this is the right set of syntactic locations; we
currently consider all contexts within templates that would result in odr-uses
after instantiation, and contexts within list-initialization (narrowing
conversions take another victim...), as requiring instantiation. We could in
principle restrict the former cases more (only const integral / reference
variable initializers, and contexts in which a constant expression is required,
perhaps). However, this is sufficient to allow us to accept libstdc++ code,
which relies on GCC's behavior (which appears to be somewhat similar to this
approach).
llvm-svn: 291318
dependent context and can't be used in a constant expression.
Per C++ [temp.inst]p2, "the instantiation of a static data member does not
occur unless the static data member is used in a way that requires the
definition to exist".
This doesn't /quite/ match that, as we still instantiate static data members
that are usable in constant expressions even if the use doesn't require a
definition. A followup patch will fix that for both variables and functions.
llvm-svn: 291295
Summary:
Replace some old code that probably pre-dated the change to delay
emission of dllexported code until after the closing brace of the
outermost record type. Only uninstantiated default argument expressions
need to be handled now. It is enough to instantiate default argument
expressions when instantiating dllexported default ctors. This also
fixes some double-diagnostic issues in this area.
Fixes PR31500
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28274
llvm-svn: 291045
Most code paths would already bail out in this case, but certain paths,
particularly overload resolution and typo correction, would not. Carrying on
with an invalid declaration could in some cases result in crashes due to
downstream code relying on declaration invariants that are not necessarily
met for invalid declarations, and in other cases just resulted in undesirable
follow-on diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 291030
Previously, if an overloaded function in a braced-init-list was encountered in
template argument deduction, and the overload set couldn't be resolved to a
particular function, we'd immediately produce a deduction failure. That's not
correct; this situation is supposed to result in that particular P/A pair being
treated as a non-deduced context, and deduction can still succeed if the type
can be deduced from elsewhere.
llvm-svn: 291014
Previously, if the arguments for a parameter pack contained a braced-init-list,
we would abort deduction (keeping the pack deductions from prior arguments) at
the point when we reached the braced-init-list, resulting in wrong deductions
and rejects-valids. We now just leave a "hole" in the pack for such an argument,
which needs to be filled by another deduction of the same pack.
llvm-svn: 290933
This reverts commit r290808, as it broken all ARM and AArch64 test-suite
test: MultiSource/UnitTests/C++11/frame_layout
Also, please, next time, try to write a commit message in according to
our guidelines:
http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#commit-messages
llvm-svn: 290811
template parameters between deduction and substitution. The idea is to accept
as many cases as possible, on the basis that substitution failure outside
the immediate context is much more common during substitution than during
implicit conversion sequence formation.
This does not implement the partial ordering portion of DR1391, which so
far appears to be misguided.
llvm-svn: 290808
We shouldn't throw a warning when the static keyword is not present in
an anonymous namespace, just like we do for -Wmissing-prototypes.
llvm-svn: 290443
Print the fully qualified names for the overload candidates. This makes
it easier to tell what the ambiguity is. Especially if a template
is instantiated after a using namespace, it will not inherit the
namespace where it was declared. The specialization will give a message
about a partial order being ambiguous for the same (unqualified) name,
which does not help identify the failure.
Addresses PR31450!
llvm-svn: 290315
This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan
failures. msan was failing because we were calling
`isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us
to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of
said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in
`isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more
easily in the future.
Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :)
Original commit message:
This patch does three things:
- Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the
number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user
functions that act in a similar manner.
- Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables
is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in
test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly
unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in
person.
- Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at
D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when
combined with our new eagerness in the face of const.
llvm-svn: 290297
effect they would have in C++11. In particular, they do not prevent
value-initialization from performing zero-initialization, nor do they prevent a
struct from being an aggregate.
llvm-svn: 290229
This commit fails MSan when running test/CodeGen/object-size.c in
a confusing way. After some discussion with George, it isn't really
clear what is going on here. We can make the MSan failure go away by
testing for the invalid bit, but *why* things are invalid isn't clear.
And yet, other code in the surrounding area is doing precisely this and
testing for invalid.
George is going to take a closer look at this to better understand the
nature of the failure and recommit it, for now backing it out to clean
up MSan builds.
llvm-svn: 290169
This patch fixes an assertion that is triggered when RecordLayoutBuilder
tries to compute the size of a field (for capture "name" in the test
case) whose type hasn't been deduced. The patch fixes the bug by
correcting the typo of the capture initializer after the initializer is
parsed and before setting the expression for the annotation token.
Fixes PR30566.
rdar://problem/23380132
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25206
llvm-svn: 290156
This patch does three things:
- Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the
number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user
functions that act in a similar manner.
- Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables
is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in
test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly
unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in
person.
- Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at
D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when
combined with our new eagerness in the face of const.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D14274
llvm-svn: 290149
* In C++, never create a FunctionNoProtoType for a builtin (fixes C++1z
crasher from r289754).
* Fix type of __sync_synchronize to be a no-parameter function rather than a
varargs function. This matches GCC.
* Fix type of vfprintf to match its actual type. We gave it a wrong type due
to PR4290 (apparently autoconf generates invalid code and expects compilers
to choke it down or it miscompiles the program; the relevant error in clang
was downgraded to a warning in r122744 to fix other occurrences of this
autoconf brokenness, so we don't need this workaround any more).
* Turn off vararg argument checking for __noop, since it's not *really* a
varargs function. Alternatively we could add custom type checking for it
and synthesize parameter types matching the actual arguments in each call,
but that seemed like overkill.
llvm-svn: 290146
lambda expression is instantiated.
Rather than waiting until Sema::CheckCXXDefaultArgExpr tries to
transform the default arguments (which fails because it can't get the
template arguments that are used), transform the default arguments
earlier when the lambda expression is transformed in
TransformLambdaExpr.
rdar://problem/27535319
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23096
llvm-svn: 289990
copy constructors of classes with array members, instead using
ArrayInitLoopExpr to represent the initialization loop.
This exposed a bug in the static analyzer where it was unable to differentiate
between zero-initialized and unknown array values, which has also been fixed
here.
llvm-svn: 289618
Other compilers accept invalid code here that we reject, and we need a
better error message to try to convince users that the code is really
incorrect. Consider:
class Foo {
typedef MyIterHelper<Foo> iterator;
friend class iterator;
};
Previously our wording was "elaborated type refers to a typedef".
"elaborated type" isn't widely known terminology, so the new diagnostic
says "typedef 'iterator' cannot be referenced with class specifier".
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25216
llvm-svn: 289259
mirror the description in the standard. Per DR1295, this means that binding a
const / rvalue reference to a bit-field no longer "binds directly", and per
P0135R1, this means that we materialize a temporary in reference binding
after adjusting cv-qualifiers and before performing a derived-to-base cast.
In C++11 onwards, this should have fixed the last case where we would
materialize a temporary of the wrong type (with a subobject adjustment inside
the MaterializeTemporaryExpr instead of outside), but we still have to deal
with that possibility in C++98, unless we want to start using xvalues to
represent materialized temporaries there too.
llvm-svn: 289250
This saves two pointers from FunctionDecl that were being used for some
rare and questionable C-only functionality. The DeclsInPrototypeScope
ArrayRef was added in r151712 in order to parse this kind of C code:
enum e {x, y};
int f(enum {y, x} n) {
return x; // should return 1, not 0
}
The challenge is that we parse 'int f(enum {y, x} n)' it its own
function prototype scope that gets popped before we build the
FunctionDecl for 'f'. The original change was doing two questionable
things:
1. Saving all tag decls introduced in prototype scope on a TU-global
Sema variable. This is problematic when you have cases like this, where
'x' and 'y' shouldn't be visible in 'f':
void f(void (*fp)(enum { x, y } e)) { /* no x */ }
This patch fixes that, so now 'f' can't see 'x', which is consistent
with GCC.
2. Storing the decls in FunctionDecl in ActOnFunctionDeclarator so that
they could be used in ActOnStartOfFunctionDef. This is just an
inefficient way to move information around. The AST lives forever, but
the list of non-parameter decls in prototype scope is short lived.
Moving these things to the Declarator solves both of these issues.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: jmolloy, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27279
llvm-svn: 289225
This commit ensures that the switch warning "case value not in enumerated type"
isn't shown for opaque enums. We don't know the actual list of values in opaque
enums, so that warning is incorrect.
rdar://29230764
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27299
llvm-svn: 289055
We continue to support dynamic exception specifications in C++1z as an
extension, but produce an error-by-default warning when we encounter one. This
allows users to opt back into the feature with a warning flag, and implicitly
opts system headers back into the feature should they happen to use it.
There is one semantic change implied by P0003R5 but not implemented here:
violating a throw() exception specification should now call std::terminate
directly instead of calling std::unexpected(), but since P0003R5 also removes
std::unexpected() and std::set_unexpected, and the default unexpected handler
calls std::terminate(), a conforming C++1z program cannot tell that we are
still calling it. The upside of this strategy is perfect backwards
compatibility; the downside is that we don't get the more efficient 'noexcept'
codegen for 'throw()'.
llvm-svn: 289019
When an object of class type is initialized from a prvalue of the same type
(ignoring cv qualifications), use the prvalue to initialize the object directly
instead of inserting a redundant elidable call to a copy constructor.
llvm-svn: 288866
Our -Wweak-vtables diagnostic is powered by our key function
calculation, which checks if key functions are enabled. We won't find
any key functions in C++ ABIs that lack key functions, so -Wweak-vtables
was warning on every dynamic class before this change. So, turn off this
warning in ABIs without key functions.
Addresses PR31220
llvm-svn: 288850
latter case, a temporary array object is materialized, and can be
lifetime-extended by binding a reference to the member access. Likewise, in an
array-to-pointer decay, an rvalue array is materialized before being converted
into a pointer.
This caused IR generation to stop treating file-scope array compound literals
as having static storage duration in some cases in C++; that has been rectified
by modeling such a compound literal as an lvalue. This also improves clang's
compatibility with GCC for those cases.
llvm-svn: 288654
arguments from a declaration; despite what the standard says, this form of
deduction should not be considering exception specifications.
llvm-svn: 288301
specifications in this mode in C++17, since they're part of the function type,
so check and diagnose them like we would if exceptions were enabled.
Better ideas welcome.
llvm-svn: 288220
Since r274049, for an inheriting constructor declaration, the name of the using
declaration (and using shadow declaration comes from the using declaration) is
the name of a derived class, not the base class (line 8225-8232 of
lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL274049). Because of
this, name-based lookup performed inside Sema::LookupConstructors returns not
only CXXConstructorDecls but also Using(Shadow)Decls, which results assertion
failure reported in PR29087.
Patch by Taewook Oh, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23765
llvm-svn: 287999
Summary:
We don't need a side table in ASTContext to hold CXXDefaultArgExprs. The
important part of building the CXXDefaultArgExprs was to ODR use the
default argument expressions, not to make AST nodes. Refactor the code
to only check the default argument, and remove the side table in
ASTContext which wasn't being serialized.
Fixes PR31121
Reviewers: thakis, rsmith, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27007
llvm-svn: 287774
with __unknown_anytype return type.
When the following code is compiled, Sema infers that the type of
__unknown_anytype is double:
extern __unknown_anytype func();
double *d = (double*)&func();
This triggers an assert in CodeGenFunction::EmitCallExprLValue because
it doesn't expect to see a call to a function with a non-reference
scalar return type.
This commit prevents the assert by making VisitUnaryAddrOf error out if
the address-of operator is applied to a call to a function with
__unknown_anytype return type.
rdar://problem/20287610
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26808
llvm-svn: 287410
During template instantiation, we currently fall back to just calling
Sema::SubstExpr for enable_if attributes that aren't value-dependent or
type-dependent. Since Sema::SubstExpr strips off any implicit casts
we've added to an expression, it's possible that this behavior will
leave us with an enable_if condition that's just a DeclRefExpr.
Conditions like that deeply confuse Sema::CheckEnableIf.
llvm-svn: 287187
Summary:
Add a warning when assigning enums to bitfields without an explicit
unsigned underlying type. This is to prevent problems with MSVC
compatibility, since the Microsoft ABI defaults to storing enums with a
signed type, causing inconsistencies with saving to/reading from
bitfields.
Also disabled the warning in the dr0xx.cpp test which throws the error,
and added a test for the warning.
The warning can be disabled with -Wno-signed-enum-bitfield.
Patch by Sasha Bermeister!
Reviewers: rnk, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, thakis, dcheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24289
llvm-svn: 287177
Before:
<stdin>:3:3: error: no matching member function for call to 'bar'
Foo().bar();
^
After:
<stdin>:3:9: error: no matching member function for call to 'bar'
Foo().bar();
^
llvm-svn: 287154
Instead of always displaying the mangled name, try to do better
and get something closer to regular functions.
Recommit r287039 (that was reverted in r287039) with a tweak to
be more generic, and test fixes!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26522
llvm-svn: 287085
Only look for a variable's value in the constant expression evaluation activation frame, if the variable was indeed declared in that frame, otherwise it might be a constant expression and be usable within a nested local scope or emit an error.
void f(char c) {
struct X {
static constexpr char f() {
return c; // error gracefully here as opposed to crashing.
}
};
int I = X::f();
}
llvm-svn: 286748
If initializer contains parentheses around braced list where it is not allowed,
as in construct int({0}), clang issued message like `functional-style cast
from 'void' to 'int' is not allowed`, which does not help much. Both gcc and
msvc issue message `list-initializer for non-class type must not be
parenthesized`, which is more descriptive. This change implements similar
message for clang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25816
llvm-svn: 286721
Since array parameters decay to pointers, '_Nullable' and friends
should be available for use there as well. This is especially
important for parameters that are typedefs of arrays. The unsugared
syntax for this follows the syntax for 'static'-sized arrays in C:
void test(int values[_Nullable]);
This syntax was previously accepted but the '_Nullable' (and any other
attributes) were silently discarded. However, applying '_Nullable' to
a typedef was previously rejected and is now accepted; therefore, it
may be necessary to test for the presence of this feature:
#if __has_feature(nullability_on_arrays)
One important change here is that DecayedTypes don't always
immediately contain PointerTypes anymore; they may contain an
AttributedType instead. This only affected one place in-tree, so I
would guess it's not likely to cause problems elsewhere.
This commit does not change -Wnullability-completeness just yet. I
want to think about whether it's worth doing something special to
avoid breaking existing clients that compile with -Werror. It also
doesn't change '#pragma clang assume_nonnull' behavior, which
currently treats the following two declarations as equivalent:
#pragma clang assume_nonnull begin
void test(void *pointers[]);
#pragma clang assume_nonnull end
void test(void * _Nonnull pointers[]);
This is not the desired behavior, but changing it would break
backwards-compatibility. Most likely the best answer is going to be
adding a new warning.
Part of rdar://problem/25846421
llvm-svn: 286519
aren't captured by lambdas with a default capture specifier
This commit is a follow-up to r286354. It avoids the -Wshadow warning for
variables which shadow variables that aren't captured by lambdas with a default
capture specifier. It provides an additional note that points to location of
the capture.
The old behaviour is preserved with -Wshadow-all or -Wshadow-uncaptured-local.
rdar://14984176
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26448
llvm-svn: 286465
by lambdas with an explicit capture list
This commit avoids the -Wshadow warning for variables which shadow variables
that aren't captured by lambdas with an explicit capture list. It provides an
additional note that points to location of the explicit capture.
The old behaviour is preserved with -Wshadow-all or -Wshadow-uncaptured-local.
rdar://17135966
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26278
llvm-svn: 286354
and FatalErrorOccurred are both set.
This fixes a crash that occurs when a warning promoted to a fatal error
leaves the AST in an incomplete state, and then later CFG analysis is
run on the incomplete AST.
rdar://problem/28558923
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26166
llvm-svn: 285923
Summary:
[expr.cast.static] states:
> 3. A glvalue of type “cv1 T1” can be cast to type “rvalue reference to cv2 T2” if “cv2 T2” is reference-compatible
> with “cv1 T1”. The result refers to the object or the specified base class subobject thereof. If T2 is
> an inaccessible or ambiguous base class of T1, a program that necessitates such a cast is
> ill-formed.
>
> 4. Otherwise, an expression e can be explicitly converted to a type T using a static_cast of the form static_-
> cast<T>(e) if the declaration T t(e); is well-formed, for some invented temporary variable t. [...]
Currently when checking p3 Clang will diagnose `static_cast<T&&>(e)` as invalid if the argument is not reference compatible with `T`. However I believe the correct behavior is to also check p4 in those cases. For example:
```
double y = 42;
static_cast<int&&>(y); // this should be OK. 'int&& t(y)' is well formed
```
Note that we still don't check p4 for non-reference-compatible types which are reference-related since `T&& t(e);` should never be well formed in those cases.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26231
llvm-svn: 285872
This commit improves the "must have C++ linkage" error diagnostics that are
emitted for C++ declarations like templates and literal operators by adding an
additional note that points to the appropriate extern "C" linkage specifier.
rdar://19021120
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26189
llvm-svn: 285823
specification to resolve the exception specification as part of the type check,
in C++1z onwards. This is not actually part of P0012 / CWG1330 rules for when
an exception specification is "needed", but is necessary for sanity.
llvm-svn: 285663
the body of a function for the purposes of computing its storage
duration and deciding whether its initializer must be constant.
There are a number of problems in our current treatment of compound
literals. C specifies that a compound literal yields an l-value
referring to an object with either static or automatic storage
duration, depending on where it was written; in the latter case,
the literal object has a lifetime tied to the enclosing scope (much
like an ObjC block), not the enclosing full-expression. To get these
semantics fully correct in our current design, we would need to
collect compound literals on the ExprWithCleanups, just like we do
with ObjC blocks; we would probably also want to identify literals
like we do with materialized temporaries. But it gets stranger;
GCC adds compound literals to C++ as an extension, but makes them
r-values, which are generally assumed to have temporary storage
duration. Ignoring destructor ordering, the difference only matters
if the object's address escapes the full-expression, which for an
r-value can only happen with reference binding (which extends
temporaries) or array-to-pointer decay (which does not). GCC then
attempts to lock down on array-to-pointer decay in ad hoc ways.
Arguably a far superior language solution for C++ (and perhaps even
array r-values in C, which can occur in other ways) would be to
propagate lifetime extension through array-to-pointer decay, so
that initializing a pointer object to a decayed r-value array
extends the lifetime of the complete object containing the array.
But this would be a major change in semantics which arguably ought
to be blessed by the committee(s).
Anyway, I'm not fixing any of that in this patch; I did try, but
it got out of hand.
Fixes rdar://28949016.
llvm-svn: 285643
The diagnostic was attempting to access the QualType of a TypeDecl by calling
TypeDecl::getTypeForDecl. However, the Type pointer stored there is lazily
loaded by functions in ASTContext. In most cases, the pointer is loaded and
this does not cause a problem. However, when more that 50 or so unknown types
are seen beforehand, this causes the Type to not be loaded, passing a null
Type to the diagnostics, leading to the crash. Using
ASTContext::getTypeDeclType will give a proper QualType for all cases.
llvm-svn: 285370
Summary: The title says it all. Additionally this patch refactors the diagnostic code into a separate function.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25292
llvm-svn: 285331
This is a misspelling of the intended !(x & A) negated bit test that happens in
practice every now and then.
I ran this on Chromium and all its dependencies, and it fired 0 times -- no
false or true positives, but it would've caught a bug in an in-progress change
that had to be caught by a Visual Studio warning instead.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26035
llvm-svn: 285310
similarly to scalar variables.
This commit makes the -Wunused-variable warning behaviour more consistent:
Now clang won't warn for array variables where it doesn't warn for scalar
variables.
rdar://24158862
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25937
llvm-svn: 285289
Sema::ActOnTag creates TagDecls for records. However, if those record
declarations are invalid, and the parser is in C++ mode, it would
silently drop the TagDecl (and leave it as "beingDefined"). The problem
is that other code (e.g. the ASTWriter) will serialize all types, and
expects them to be complete. So, leaving them open would result in
failing asserts.
Fixes PR20320
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21176
llvm-svn: 285275
Summary:
This patch adds semantic checking and building of the fall-through `co_return;` statement as well as the `p.set_exception(std::current_exception())` call for handling uncaught exceptions.
The fall-through statement is built and checked according to:
> [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/4
> The unqualified-ids return_void and return_value are looked up in the scope of class P. If
> both are found, the program is ill-formed. If the unqualified-id return_void is found, flowing
> off the end of a coroutine is equivalent to a co_return with no operand. Otherwise, flowing off
> the end of a coroutine results in undefined behavior.
Similarly the `set_exception` call is only built when that unqualified-id is found in the scope of class P.
Additionally this patch adds fall-through warnings for non-void returning coroutines. Since it's surprising undefined behavior I thought it would be important to add the warning right away.
Reviewers: majnemer, GorNishanov, rsmith
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25349
llvm-svn: 285271
This has the following ABI impact:
1) Functions whose parameter or return types are non-throwing function pointer
types have different manglings in c++1z mode from prior modes. This is
necessary because c++1z permits overloading on the noexceptness of function
pointer parameter types. A warning is issued for cases that will change
manglings in c++1z mode.
2) Functions whose parameter or return types contain instantiation-dependent
exception specifications change manglings in all modes. This is necessary
to support overloading on / SFINAE in these exception specifications, which
a careful reading of the standard indicates has essentially always been
permitted.
Note that, in order to be affected by these changes, the code in question must
specify an exception specification on a function pointer/reference type that is
written syntactically within the declaration of another function. Such
declarations are very rare, and I have so far been unable to find any code
that would be affected by this. (Note that such things will probably become
more common in C++17, since it's a lot easier to get a noexcept function type
as a function parameter / return type there.)
This change does not affect the set of symbols produced by a build of clang,
libc++, or libc++abi.
llvm-svn: 285150
has no field declaration.
This commit fixes an invalid Winitializer-overrides warning that's shown
when analyzing a second (or any after the first) instantiation of a designated
initializer. This invalid warning is fixed by making sure that a
DesignatedInitExpr is rebuilt by the tree transformer when it has a field
designator whose FieldDecl* hasn't been yet initialized. This ensures that a
different DesignatedInitExpr is processed by Sema for every instantiation, and
thus the invalid warning is avoided.
rdar://28768441
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25777
llvm-svn: 284959
This has two significant effects:
1) Direct relational comparisons between null pointer constants (0 and nullopt)
and pointers are now ill-formed. This was always the case for C, and it
appears that C++ only ever permitted by accident. For instance, cases like
nullptr < &a
are now rejected.
2) Comparisons and conditional operators between differently-cv-qualified
pointer types now work, and produce a composite type that both source
pointer types can convert to (when possible). For instance, comparison
between 'int **' and 'const int **' is now valid, and uses an intermediate
type of 'const int *const *'.
Clang previously supported #2 as an extension.
We do not accept the cases in #1 as an extension. I've tested a fair amount of
code to check that this doesn't break it, but if it turns out that someone is
relying on this, we can easily add it back as an extension.
This is a re-commit of r284800.
llvm-svn: 284890
we don't collapse that down to a single entry if it's not a redeclaration.
Instead, set the Redeclaration bit on the Declarator to indicate whether a
function is a redeclaration (which may not have been linked into the
redeclaration chain if it's a dependent context friend).
Fixes a rejects-valid; see testcase.
llvm-svn: 284802
This has two significant effects:
1) Direct relational comparisons between null pointer constants (0 and nullopt)
and pointers are now ill-formed. This was always the case for C, and it
appears that C++ only ever permitted by accident. For instance, cases like
nullptr < &a
are now rejected.
2) Comparisons and conditional operators between differently-cv-qualified
pointer types now work, and produce a composite type that both source
pointer types can convert to (when possible). For instance, comparison
between 'int **' and 'const int **' is now valid, and uses an intermediate
type of 'const int *const *'.
Clang previously supported #2 as an extension.
We do not accept the cases in #1 as an extension. I've tested a fair amount of
code to check that this doesn't break it, but if it turns out that someone is
relying on this, we can easily add it back as an extension.
llvm-svn: 284800
not instantiate exception specifications of functions if they were only used in
unevaluated contexts (other than 'noexcept' expressions).
In C++17 onwards, this becomes essential since the exception specification is
now part of the function's type.
Note that this means that constructs like the following no longer work:
struct A {
static T f() noexcept(...);
decltype(f()) *p;
};
... because the decltype expression now needs the exception specification of
'f', which has not yet been parsed.
llvm-svn: 284549
dependent noexcept specifications result in the same canonical function type.
We still use non-canonical hashing when deduplicating type sugar so that
diagnostics will point to the right place.
llvm-svn: 284457
This commit marks the transparent_union attributes as C only because clang
doesn't support them in C++ mode. Prior to this commit, clang still tried to
verify these attributes in C++, leading to crashes when analyzing templated
transparent_union unions that have dependent field types. This commit ensures
that such crashes won't happen again.
As a result of this commit clang now displays a warning every time it encounters
a transparent_union attribute in C++ mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25308
llvm-svn: 283995
swift_error/swift_context parameter
We need to be able to decelare witness functions which append the self type and
the self witness tables at the end of the parameter list.
rdar://28720996
llvm-svn: 283933
Summary:
Once a base class has been made invalid (by a static_assert for example) all using-member declarations in the derived classes will result in a "not a base class" diagnostic. This diagnostic is very misleading and should not be emitted.
This change is needed to help libc++ produce reasonable diagnostics in `std::optional` and `std::variant`.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25430
llvm-svn: 283755
CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints. These no longer produce ExprError() when they
have not emitted an error, and reliably inform the caller when they *have*
emitted an error.
This fixes some serious issues where we would fail to emit any diagnostic for
invalid code and then attempt to emit code for an invalid AST, and conversely
some issues where we would emit two diagnostics for the same problem.
llvm-svn: 283508
Summary:
Previously the statement `co_return {42}` would be transformed into `P.return_void()`, since the type of `{42}` is represented as `void` by Clang.
This patch fixes the bug by checking for `InitListExpr` arguments and transforming them accordingly.
Reviewers: majnemer, GorNishanov, rsmith
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25296
llvm-svn: 283495
new expression, distinguish between the case of a constant and non-constant
initializer. In the former case, if the bound is erroneous (too many
initializer elements, bound is negative, or allocated size overflows), reject,
and take the bound into account when determining whether we need to
default-construct any elements. In the remanining cases, move the logic to
check for default-constructibility of trailing elements into the initialization
code rather than inventing a bogus array bound, to cope with cases where the
number of initialized elements is not the same as the number of initializer
list elements (this can happen due to string literal initialization or brace
elision).
This also fixes rejects-valid and crash-on-valid errors when initializing a
new'd array of character type from a braced string literal.
llvm-svn: 283406
Clang has a diagnostic for the what happens when an elaborated type
implicitly creates a tag declaration and the initial tag lookup fails,
but the redeclaration lookup succeeds and finds a non-tag type. However,
it wasn't tested, and looked like dead code. After much staring, we
discovered how to exercise it, and are now committing the test for
posterity.
In this example, the tag lookup will not find A, but then when we go to
insert a declaration of A at global scope, we discover the template
friend, which is not a tag type.
struct C {
template <typename> friend struct A;
};
struct B {
struct A *p;
};
llvm-svn: 283235
Treating large 0x*LL literals as signed instead of unsigned is not a
conforming language extension, so move it out of -fms-extensions.
Came up in PR30605
llvm-svn: 283227
Previously if a file-level function was defined inside befriending
template class, it always was treated as defined. For instance, the code like:
```
int func(int x);
template<typename T> class C1 {
friend int func(int x) { return x; }
};
template<typename T> class C2 {
friend int func(int x) { return x; }
};
```
could not be compiled due to function redefinition, although not of the templates
is instantiated. Moreover, the body of friend function can contain use of template
parameters, attempt to get definition of such function outside any instantiation
causes compiler abnormal termination.
Other compilers (gcc, icc) follow viewpoint that the body of the function defined
in friend declaration becomes available when corresponding class is instantiated.
This patch implements this viewpoint in clang.
Definitions introduced by friend declarations in template classes are not added
to the redeclaration chain of corresponding function. Only when the template is
instantiated, instantiation of the function definition is placed to the chain.
The fix was made in collaboration with Richard Smith.
This change fixes PR8035, PR17923, PR22307 and PR25848.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16989
llvm-svn: 283207
declarations.
This commit ensures that the correct record type is printed out for the
using declarations that represent C++ inherited constructors.
It fixes a regression introduced in r274049 which changed the name that's
stored in the using declarations that correspond to inherited constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25131
llvm-svn: 283105
declarations.
This commit ensures that the correct record type is printed out for the
using declarations that represent C++ inherited constructors.
It fixes a regression introduced in r274049 which changed the name that's
stored in the using declarations that correspond to inherited constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25131
llvm-svn: 283102
Summary:
Also makes -fcoroutines_ts to be both a Driver and CC1 flag.
Patch mostly by EricWF.
Reviewers: rnk, cfe-commits, rsmith, EricWF
Subscribers: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25130
llvm-svn: 283064
With templated classes, is possible to not be able to determine is a member
function is a special member function before the class is instantiated. Only
these special member functions can be defaulted. In some cases, knowing
whether a function is a special member function can't be determined until
instantiation, so an uninstantiated function could possibly be defaulted too.
Add a case to the error diagnostic when the function marked with a default is
not known to be a special member function.
llvm-svn: 282989
Summary: The title says it all.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25078
llvm-svn: 282973
In some cases, non-special member functions were being marked as being defaulted
in templated classes. This can cause interactions with later code that expects
the default function to be one of the specific member functions. Fix the check
so that templated class members are checked the same way as non-templated class
members are.
llvm-svn: 282547
This mostly behaves cl.exe's behavior, even though clang-cl is stricter in some
corner cases and more lenient in others (see the included test).
To make the uuid declared previously here diagnostic work correctly, tweak
stripTypeAttributesOffDeclSpec() to keep attributes in the right order.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24469
llvm-svn: 281367
r280553 introduced an issue where we'd emit ambiguity errors for code
like:
```
void foo(int *, int);
void foo(unsigned int *, unsigned int);
void callFoo() {
unsigned int i;
foo(&i, 0); // ambiguous: int->unsigned int is worse than int->int,
// but unsigned int*->unsigned int* is better than
// int*->int*.
}
```
This patch fixes this issue by changing how we handle ill-formed (but
valid) implicit conversions. Candidates with said conversions now always
rank worse than candidates without them, and two candidates are
considered to be equally bad if they both have these conversions for
the same argument.
Additionally, this fixes a case in C++11 where we'd complain about an
ambiguity in a case like:
```
void f(char *, int);
void f(const char *, unsigned);
void g() { f("abc", 0); }
```
...Since conversion to char* from a string literal is considered
ill-formed in C++11 (and deprecated in C++03), but we accept it as an
extension.
llvm-svn: 280847
copy-initialization. We previously got this wrong in a couple of ways:
- we only looked for copy / move constructors and constructor templates for
this copy, and thus would fail to copy in cases where doing so should use
some other constructor (but see core issue 670),
- we mishandled the special case for disabling user-defined conversions that
blocks infinite recursion through repeated application of a copy constructor
(applying it in slightly too many cases) -- though as far as I can tell,
this does not ever actually affect the result of overload resolution, and
- we misapplied the special-case rules for constructors taking a parameter
whose type is a (reference to) the same class type by incorrectly assuming
that only happens for copy/move constructors (it also happens for
constructors instantiated from templates and those inherited from base
classes).
These changes should only affect strange corner cases (for instance, where the
copy constructor exists but has a non-const-qualified parameter type), so for
the most part it only causes us to produce more 'candidate' notes, but see the
test changes for other cases whose behavior is affected.
llvm-svn: 280776
Summary:
This attribute specifies expectations about the initialization of static and
thread local variables. Specifically that the variable has a
[constant initializer](http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/constant_initialization)
according to the rules of [basic.start.static]. Failure to meet this expectation
will result in an error.
Static objects with constant initializers avoid hard-to-find bugs caused by
the indeterminate order of dynamic initialization. They can also be safely
used by other static constructors across translation units.
This attribute acts as a compile time assertion that the requirements
for constant initialization have been met. Since these requirements change
between dialects and have subtle pitfalls it's important to fail fast instead
of silently falling back on dynamic initialization.
```c++
// -std=c++14
#define SAFE_STATIC __attribute__((require_constant_initialization)) static
struct T {
constexpr T(int) {}
~T();
};
SAFE_STATIC T x = {42}; // OK.
SAFE_STATIC T y = 42; // error: variable does not have a constant initializer
// copy initialization is not a constant expression on a non-literal type.
```
This attribute can only be applied to objects with static or thread-local storage
duration.
Reviewers: majnemer, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23385
llvm-svn: 280525
Summary:
This attribute specifies expectations about the initialization of static and
thread local variables. Specifically that the variable has a
[constant initializer](http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/constant_initialization)
according to the rules of [basic.start.static]. Failure to meet this expectation
will result in an error.
Static objects with constant initializers avoid hard-to-find bugs caused by
the indeterminate order of dynamic initialization. They can also be safely
used by other static constructors across translation units.
This attribute acts as a compile time assertion that the requirements
for constant initialization have been met. Since these requirements change
between dialects and have subtle pitfalls it's important to fail fast instead
of silently falling back on dynamic initialization.
```c++
// -std=c++14
#define SAFE_STATIC __attribute__((require_constant_initialization)) static
struct T {
constexpr T(int) {}
~T();
};
SAFE_STATIC T x = {42}; // OK.
SAFE_STATIC T y = 42; // error: variable does not have a constant initializer
// copy initialization is not a constant expression on a non-literal type.
```
This attribute can only be applied to objects with static or thread-local storage
duration.
Reviewers: majnemer, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23385
llvm-svn: 280516
explicit specialization to a warning for C++98 mode (this is a defect report
resolution, so per our informal policy it should apply in C++98), and turn
the warning on by default for C++11 and later. In all cases where it fires, the
right thing to do is to remove the pointless explicit instantiation.
llvm-svn: 280308
In certain cases (mostly coming from modules), Sema's idea of the StdNamespace
does not point to the first declaration of namespace std.
Patch by Cristina Cristescu!
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 279371
Currently, when trying to evaluate an enable_if condition, we try to
evaluate all arguments a user passes to a function. Given that we can't
use variadic arguments from said condition anyway, not converting them
is a reasonable thing to do. So, this patch makes us ignore any varargs
when attempting to check an enable_if condition.
We'd crash because, in order to convert an argument, we need its
ParmVarDecl. Variadic arguments don't have ParmVarDecls.
llvm-svn: 278471
Reapply r277787. For memset (and others) we can get diagnostics like:
struct stat { int x; };
void foo(struct stat *stamps) {
bzero(stamps, sizeof(stamps));
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
}
t.c:7:28: warning: 'memset' call operates on objects of type 'struct stat' while the size is based on a different type 'struct stat *' [-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess]
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
~~~~~~ ^~~~~~
t.c:7:28: note: did you mean to dereference the argument to 'sizeof' (and multiply it by the number of elements)?
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
^~~~~~
This patch implements the same class of warnings for bzero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22525
rdar://problem/18963514
llvm-svn: 278264
If the return type is a pointer and the function returns the reference to a
pointer, don't warn since only the value is returned, not the reference.
If a reference function parameter appears in the reference chain, don't warn
since binding happens at the caller scope, so addresses returned are not
to local stack. This includes default arguments as well.
llvm-svn: 277889
For builtin logical operators, there is a well-defined ordering of argument
evaluation. For overloaded operator of the same type, there is no argument
evaluation order, similar to other function calls. When both are present,
uninstantiated templates with an operator&& is treated as an unresolved
function call. Unresolved function calls are treated as normal function calls,
and may result in false positives when the builtin logical operator is used.
Have the unsequenced checker ignore dependent expressions to avoid this
false positive. The check also happens in template instantiations to catch
when the overloaded operator is used.
llvm-svn: 277866
For memset (and others) we can get diagnostics like:
struct stat { int x; };
void foo(struct stat *stamps) {
bzero(stamps, sizeof(stamps));
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
}
t.c:7:28: warning: 'memset' call operates on objects of type 'struct stat' while the size is based on a different type 'struct stat *' [-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess]
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
~~~~~~ ^~~~~~
t.c:7:28: note: did you mean to dereference the argument to 'sizeof' (and multiply it by the number of elements)?
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
^~~~~~
This patch implements the same class of warnings for bzero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22525
rdar://problem/18963514
llvm-svn: 277787
Fix a crash under -Wthread-safety when finding the destructor for a
lifetime-extending reference.
A patch by Nandor Licker!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22419
llvm-svn: 277522
Additionally, for pre-C++1z, instead of forbidding a lambda's closure type from being a literal type through circumlocutorily setting HasNonLiteralTypeFieldsOrBases falsely to true -- handle lambda's more directly in CXXRecordDecl::isLiteral().
One additional small step towards implementing constexpr-lambdas.
Thanks to Richard Smith for his review!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22662
llvm-svn: 276514
decomposition declarations.
There are a couple of things in the wording that seem strange here:
decomposition declarations are permitted at namespace scope (which we partially
support here) and they are permitted as the declaration in a template (which we
reject).
llvm-svn: 276492
In atomic builtins, we assumed that the LValue conversion on the first
argument would succeed. So, we would crash given code like:
```
void ovl(char);
void ovl(int);
__atomic_store_n(ovl, 0, 0);
```
This patch makes us not assume that said conversion is successful. :)
llvm-svn: 276232
nullabilities of its operands.
This patch defines a function to compute the nullability of conditional
expressions, which enables Sema to precisely detect implicit conversions
of nullable conditional expressions to nonnull pointers.
rdar://problem/25166556
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22392
llvm-svn: 276076
It's a patch for PR28050. Seems like overloading resolution wipes out
the first standard conversion sequence (before user-defined conversion)
in case of deprecated string literal conversion.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21228
Patch by Alexander Makarov
llvm-svn: 275970
they're redeclarations. This is necessary in order for name lookup to correctly
find the most recent declaration of the name (which affects default template
argument lookup and cross-module merging, among other things).
llvm-svn: 275612
Eric Fiselier