Remove CompilerInstance::VirtualFileSystem and
CompilerInstance::setVirtualFileSystem, instead relying on the VFS in
the FileManager. CompilerInstance and its clients already went to some
trouble to make these match. Now they are guaranteed to match.
As part of this, I added a VFS parameter (defaults to nullptr) to
CompilerInstance::createFileManager, to avoid repeating construction
logic in clients that just wanted to customize the VFS.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59377
llvm-svn: 357037
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The new guideline is to qualify with 'llvm::' explicitly both in
'.h' and '.cpp' files. This simplifies moving the code between
header and source files and is easier to keep consistent.
llvm-svn: 350531
Standardize on the most common namespace setup in our *.cpp files:
using namespace llvm;
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(StringRef) { ... }
And remove redundant llvm:: qualifiers. (Except for cases like
make_unique where this causes problems with std:: and ADL).
This choice is pretty arbitrary, but some broad consistency is nice.
This is going to conflict with everything. Sorry :-/
Squash the other configurations:
A)
using namespace llvm;
using namespace clang;
using namespace clangd;
void clangd::foo(StringRef);
This is in some of the older files. (It prevents accidentally defining a
new function instead of one in the header file, for what that's worth).
B)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(llvm::StringRef) { ... }
This is fine, but in practice the using directive often gets added over time.
C)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
using namespace llvm; // inside the namespace
This was pretty common, but is a bit misleading: name lookup preferrs
clang::clangd::foo > clang::foo > llvm:: foo (no matter where the using
directive is).
llvm-svn: 344850
This patch moves the virtual file system form clang to llvm so it can be
used by more projects.
Concretely the patch:
- Moves VirtualFileSystem.{h|cpp} from clang/Basic to llvm/Support.
- Moves the corresponding unit test from clang to llvm.
- Moves the vfs namespace from clang::vfs to llvm::vfs.
- Formats the lines affected by this change, mostly this is the result of
the added llvm namespace.
RFC on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/126657.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52783
llvm-svn: 344140
Summary:
log() is split into four functions:
- elog()/log()/vlog() have different severity levels, allowing filtering
- dlog() is a lazy macro which uses LLVM_DEBUG - it logs to the logger, but
conditionally based on -debug-only flag and is omitted in release builds
All logging functions use formatv-style format strings now, e.g:
log("Could not resolve URI {0}: {1}", URI, Result.takeError());
Existing log sites have been split between elog/log/vlog by best guess.
This includes a workaround for passing Error to formatv that can be
simplified when D49170 or similar lands.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49008
llvm-svn: 336785
Summary:
To aid debugging failures and crashes.
Only part of ignored diagnostics was logged before, now we log all of
them.
Reviewers: ioeric, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: klimek, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43123
llvm-svn: 324888
Summary:
This improves performance of code completion, because we avoid stating
the files from the preamble and never attempt to parse the files
without using the preamble if it's provided.
However, the change comes at a cost of sometimes providing incorrect
results when doing code completion after making actually considerable
changes to the files used in the preamble or the preamble itself.
Eventually the preamble will get rebuilt and code completion will
be providing the correct results.
Reviewers: bkramer, sammccall, jkorous-apple
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41991
llvm-svn: 322854
Summary: Shared details of ClangdUnit and CodeComplete moved to a new Compiler file.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40719
llvm-svn: 319655
Sam McCall