"insert_subreg, subreg_to_reg, and reg_sequence" instructions' after
adjusting some unittest checks.
This is to solve PR28852. The restriction was added at 2010 to make better register
coalescing. We assumed that it was not necessary any more. Testing results on x86
supported the assumption.
We will look closely to any performance impact it will bring and will be prepared
to help analyzing performance problem found on other architectures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23210
llvm-svn: 278466
This patch helps avoid false dependencies on undef registers by updating the machine instructions' undef operand to use a register that the instruction is truly dependent on, or use a register with clearance higher than Pref.
Pseudo example:
loop:
xmm0 = ...
xmm1 = vcvtsi2sdl eax, xmm0<undef>
... = inst xmm0
jmp loop
In this example, selecting xmm0 as the undef register creates false dependency between loop iterations.
This false dependency cannot be solved by inserting an xor before vcvtsi2sdl because xmm0 is alive at the point of the vcvtsi2sdl instruction.
Selecting a different register instead of xmm0, especially a register that is not used in the loop, will eliminate this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22466
llvm-svn: 278321
If we don't, values that aren't precisely representable in f16 could
be used as-is in a promoted f32 operation, which would produce
incorrect results.
AArch64 had the correct behavior; add a focused test.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR26871
llvm-svn: 268700
Summary:
This patch skips DAG combine of fp_round (fp_round x) if it results in
an fp_round from f80 to f16.
fp_round from f80 to f16 always generates an expensive (and as yet,
unimplemented) libcall to __truncxfhf2. This prevents selection of
native f16 conversion instructions from f32 or f64. Moreover, the first
(value-preserving) fp_round from f80 to either f32 or f64 may become a
NOP in platforms like x86.
Reviewers: ab
Subscribers: srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17221
llvm-svn: 260769
Officially, we don't acknowledge non-default configurations of MXCSR,
as getting there would require usage of the FENV_ACCESS pragma (at
least insofar as rounding mode is concerned).
We don't support the pragma, so we can assume that the default
rounding mode - round to nearest, ties to even - is always used.
However, it's inconsistent with the rest of the instruction set,
where MXCSR is always effective (unless otherwise specified).
Also, it's an unnecessary obstacle to the few brave souls that use
fenv.h with LLVM.
Avoid the hard-coded rounding mode for fp_to_f16; use MXCSR instead.
llvm-svn: 259448
Caller saved regs differ between SysV and Win64. Use the tail call available set to scavenge from.
Refactor register info to create new helper to get at tail call GPRs. Added a new test case for windows. Fixed up a number of X64 tests since now RCX is preferred over RDX on SysV.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14878
llvm-svn: 253927
Summary:
r235215 adds support for f16 to be considered as a load/store type and
promote f16 operations to f32.
This patch has miscellaneous fixes for the X86 backend so all f16
operations are handled:
1. Set loadextaction for f16 vectors to expand.
2. Handle FP_EXTEND in a switch statement when handling v2f32
3. Do not fold (FP_TO_SINT (load f16)) into FP_TO_INT*_IN_MEM or
(store (SINT_TO_FP )) to a FILD.
Tests included.
Reviewers: ab, srhines, delena
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9092
llvm-svn: 237004
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
Actual support for softening f16 operations is still limited, and can be added
when it's needed. But Soften is much closer to being a useful thing to try
than keeping it Legal when no registers can actually hold such values.
Longer term, we probably want something between Soften and Promote semantics
for most targets, it'll be more efficient to promote the 4 basic operations to
f32 than libcall them.
llvm-svn: 213372
Wei Mi