Previously our relocations we rewrote were broken for that case.
We emited incorrect addend and broken relocation info field
because did not produce section symbol for mergeable synthetic sections.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40070
llvm-svn: 318394
It was reported (https://reviews.llvm.org/D38724#902841) that when we use
-ffunction-sections --emit-relocs build, REL[A] output section receives the name of first
input section, like .rela.text.first_function_in_text rather than .rela.text.
It is probably not really an issue as sh_info still points to correct target section, but
it does not look clean in output and allows internal section name to leak there,
what at least looks confusing and is not consistent with ld.bfd.
Patch changes this behavior so that target output section name is used as a base.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39242
llvm-svn: 316760
Spec says: (http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch4.sheader.html)
sh_info
This member holds extra information, whose interpretation depends on the section type.
If the sh_flags field for this section header includes the attribute SHF_INFO_LINK,
then this member represents a section header table index.
SHF_INFO_LINK
The sh_info field of this section header holds a section header table index.
Since sh_info for SHT_REL[A] sections should contain the section header index of the
section to which the relocation applies, this is
consistent with spec to put this flag. Behavior matches both bfd and gold as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33763
llvm-svn: 304531
Unfortunately some consumers of our .o files produced with -r expect
only one section symbol per section. That is true of at least of go's
own linker.
Combining them is a somewhat convoluted process. We have to create a
symbol for every section since we don't know which ones will be
needed. The relocation sections also have to be written first to
handle the Elf_Rel addend.
I did consider a completely different approach:
We could remove the -r special case of relocation sections when
reading. We would instead have a copyRelocs function that is used
instead of scanRelocs. It would create a DynamicReloc for each
relocation and a RelocationSection for each input relocation section.
A complication of such change is that DynamicReloc would have to take
a section index and a input section instead of a symbol since with
-emit-relocs some DynamicReloc would hold relocations referring to the
dynamic symbol table and other to the static symbol table.
That would be a pretty big change, and if we do it it is probably
better to do it as a refactoring.
llvm-svn: 294816
with temporarily file name fix in testcase.
Original commit message:
-q, --emit-relocs - Generate relocations in output
Simplest implementation:
* no GC case,
* no "/DISCARD/" linkerscript command support.
This patch is extracted from D28612 / D29636,
Relative to PR31579.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29663
llvm-svn: 294469
-q, --emit-relocs - Generate relocations in output
Simplest implementation:
* no GC case,
* no "/DISCARD/" linkerscript command support.
This patch is extracted from D28612 / D29636,
Relative to PR31579.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29663
llvm-svn: 294464
George Rimar