This reverts commit 7804dbddcc.
This change broke a bunch of tests of the WebAssembly waterfall.
Will hopefully reland with increased test coverage.
llvm-svn: 361273
But don't apply comdat groups when loading the LTO object files.
This is basically the same logic used by the ELF linker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61924
llvm-svn: 360782
This matches the ELF does. Update the comment in ELF/Symbols.h and
duplicate it in wasm/Symbols.h
This a followup on rL355580 and rL355577.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59075
llvm-svn: 355737
The code for encoding the symbols signature into its name
was not actually being used in the final version of this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58482
llvm-svn: 354539
Previously we could emit a warning and generate a potentially invalid
wasm module (due to call sites and functions having conflicting
signatures). Now, rather than create invalid binaries we handle such
cases by creating stub functions containing unreachable, effectively
turning these into runtime errors rather than validation failures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57909
llvm-svn: 354528
Add a flag to allow symbols to have a wasm import name which differs from the
linker symbol name, allowing the linker to link code using the import_module
attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57632
llvm-svn: 353473
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37168
This is only a first pass at supporting these custom import
modules. In the long run we most likely want to treat these
kinds of symbols very differently. For example, it should not
be possible to resolve such as symbol at static link type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45796
llvm-svn: 352828
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
With LTO when and undefined function (with a known signature)
in replaced by a defined bitcode function we were loosing the
signature information (since bitcode functions don't have
signatures).
With this change we preserve the original signature from the
undefined function and verify that the post LTO compiled
function has the correct signature.
This change improves the error handling in the case where
there is a signature mismatch with a function defined in
a bitcode file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50721
llvm-svn: 343340
This matches the behavior of the ELF linker where -u/--undefined
means symbols will get pulled in from archives but won't result
in link error if they are missing.
Also, don't actually great symbol table entries for the undefined
symbols, again matching more closely the ELF linker.
This also results in simplification of the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50279
llvm-svn: 338938
Function symbols that come from bitcode have not signatures.
After LTO when the real symbols are read in we need to make
sure that we set the signature on the existing symbol.
the signature-less undefined functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48693
llvm-svn: 335875
This caused a lot of issues on the WebAssembly waterfall.
In particular, until with the signature of `main`. We
probably want a better solution for main before we re-land.
Reverts rL335192
llvm-svn: 335355
During symbol resolution, emit warnings for function signature
mismatches. During GC, if any mismatched symbol is marked as live
then generate an error.
This means that we only error out if the mismatch is written to the
final output. i.e. if we would generate an invalid wasm file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48394
llvm-svn: 335192
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44977
llvm-svn: 332351
Since we a no longer using this function for the wasm start
section we don't actually care what its signature is.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46594
llvm-svn: 332308
This reduces the number of lookups to one per COMDAT group, rather than
one per symbol in a COMDAT group.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44344
llvm-svn: 327523
Previously we created __wasm_call_ctors with null InputFunction, and
added the InputFunction later. Now we create the SyntheticFunction with
null body, and set the body later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44206
llvm-svn: 327149
Previously, one function adds all types of undefined symbols. That
doesn't fit to the wasm's undefined symbol semantics well because
different types of undefined symbols are very different in wasm.
As a result, separate control flows merge in this addUndefined function
and then separate again for each type. That wasn't easy to read.
This patch separates the function into three functions. Now it is pretty
clear what we are doing for each undefined symbol type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43697
llvm-svn: 326271
Purely a rename in preparation for adding new global symbol type.
We want to use GlobalSymbol to represent real wasm globals and
DataSymbol for pointers to things in linear memory (what ELF would
call STT_OBJECT).
This reduces the size the patch to add the explicit symbol table
which is coming soon!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43476
llvm-svn: 325645
The profailing style in lld seem to be to not include such empty lines.
Clang-tidy/clang-format seem to handle this just fine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43528
llvm-svn: 325629
I think if statements that end with return is easier to read than
cascaded if-else-if-else-if statements because it makes clear that
execution of a function terminates there. This patch also adds more
blank lines to separate code blocks to meaningful pieces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43517
llvm-svn: 325625
We already have isa<> for this, and these methods were simply
duplicating those redundantly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43422
llvm-svn: 325418
Sam Clegg