Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Majnemer 99b98f07d4 AST: Remove overzealous assertion from IsModifiable
It's reasonable to ask if an l-value with class type is modifiable.

llvm-svn: 225121
2015-01-04 00:44:32 +00:00
David Majnemer 04b78412ad Sema: Permit array l-values in asm output operands
GCC permits array l-values in asm output operands even though they
aren't modifiable l-values.  We used to permit it but this behavior
regressed in r224916.

llvm-svn: 224918
2014-12-29 10:29:53 +00:00
David Majnemer 0f4d641005 Sema: Only permit permit modifiable l-values as asm output params
Functions are l-values in C++ but shouldn't be available as output
parameters in inline assembly.  Neither should overloaded function
l-values.

This fixes PR21949.

llvm-svn: 224916
2014-12-29 09:30:33 +00:00
Richard Smith 091405d7e3 Reword switch/goto diagnostics "protected scope" diagnostics. Making up a term
"protected scope" is very unhelpful here and actively confuses users. Instead,
simply state the nature of the problem in the diagnostic: we cannot jump from
here to there. The notes explain nicely why not.

llvm-svn: 217293
2014-09-06 00:24:58 +00:00
Richard Trieu 553b2b2e5d Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string and
diagnostic message are compared.  If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given.  This gives rise to an unexpected case:

  // expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}

will match the following error messages from Clang:

  candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
  candidate function has different number of parameters

It will also match these other error messages:

  candidate function
  function has different number of parameters
  number of parameters

This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting.  Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected.  Some stats from this cleanup:

87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)

llvm-svn: 146619
2011-12-15 00:38:15 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 589973b097 In C++98/03, an uninitialized variable that has POD class type will be
uninitialized. This seems not to be the case in C++0x, where we still
call the (trivial) default constructor for a POD class
(!). Previously, we had implemented only the C++0x rules; now we
implement both. Fixes PR6536.

llvm-svn: 97928
2010-03-08 02:45:10 +00:00
Chris Lattner 30d0cfda35 Implement jump checking for initialized c++ variables, implementing
a fixme and PR6451.

Only perform jump checking if the containing function has no errors,
and add the infrastructure needed to do this.

On the testcase in the PR, we produce:

t.cc:6:3: error: illegal goto into protected scope
  goto later;
  ^
t.cc:7:5: note: jump bypasses variable initialization
  X x;
    ^

llvm-svn: 97497
2010-03-01 20:59:53 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar a45cf5b6b0 Rename clang to clang-cc.
Tests and drivers updated, still need to shuffle dirs.

llvm-svn: 67602
2009-03-24 02:24:46 +00:00
Chris Lattner 0cb00d66ea This is valid in C++.
void foo() { return foo(); }

llvm-svn: 61188
2008-12-18 02:03:48 +00:00