Summary:
This is the second attempt at allowing for the use of libraries that the linker cannot find. The first attempt used `CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH` and `find_library` to select which ABI library should be used. There were a number of problems with this approach:
- `find_library` didn't work with cmake targets (ie in-tree libcxxabi build)
- It wasn't always possible to determine where `find_library` actually found your library.
- `target_link_libraries` inserted the path of the ABI library into libc++'s RPATH when `find_library` was used.
- Linking libc++ and it's ABI library is a special case. It's a lot easier to keep it simple.
After discussion with @cbergstrum a new approach was decided upon.
This patch achieve the same ends by simply using `LIBCXX_CXX_ABI_LIBRARY_PATH` to specify where to find the library (if the linker won't find it). When this variable is defined it is simply added as a library search path when linking libc++. It is a lot easier to duplicate this behavior in LIT. It also prevents libc++ from being linked with an RPATH.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, cbergstrom, chandlerc, danalbert
Reviewed By: chandlerc, danalbert
Subscribers: chandlerc, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5860
llvm-svn: 220157
Summary:
This patch adds support for building/testing libc++ with an ABI library that the linker would not normally find.
- `CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH` is used to specify the list of search directories.
- The ABI library is now found using `find_library` instead of assuming its along the linker's search path.
- `CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH` is passed to our LIT config as `library_paths`.
- For each path in `library_paths` the following flags are added `-L<path> -Wl,-rpath -Wl,<path>`
Some changes in existing behavior were also added:
- `target_link_libraries` is now passed the ABI library file instead of the library name. Ex `target_link_libraries(cxx "/usr/lib/libc++abi.so")` vs `target_link_libraries(cxx "c++abi")`.
- `-Wl,-rpath -Wl,<path>` is now used on OSX to link to libc++ instead of env['DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH'] if `use_system_lib=False`.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, danalbert, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5038
llvm-svn: 220118
Summary:
Instead of having to update test results for different platforms it would be helpful to just supply links to buildbots that build+test libcxx.
For the FreeBSD bots Pawel Worach gave me the OK to link to them.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, danalbert
Reviewed By: danalbert
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4947
llvm-svn: 215882
Okay, so this actually does more than just that. I've rearranged most of
the information on the page to try to make it more helpful and flow
better. Essentially, the differences between Mac and Linux, the various
ABI libraries, and in-tree versus out-of-tree builds were cluttering
things. To clean up, I've done the following:
* Only describe the cmake process. buildit doesn't work out of the box
on Linux, and we need to stop having duplicates for every process.
* Use libc++abi for the default instructions. This works on the major
platforms.
* Describe both in-tree and out-of-tree builds. Previously it wasn't
clear that in-tree builds were even possible for libc++.
* Separate the documentation about using libc++ from that about
building and testing libc++.
llvm-svn: 215358
Summary:
This patch adds the `<experimental/utility>` header as specified in the latest draft of the library fundamentals TS.
`<experimental/utility>` only contains `class erased_type`.
This patch also updates the documentation to list the `erased_type` class as "initial implementation complete".
Test Plan:
Three test cases where added:
1. Test that `_LIBCPP_VERSION` is defined.
2. Test that `<utility>` has been included.
3. Test that `erased_type` is in the correct namespace and is constexpr default constructible.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4510
llvm-svn: 213226
to remove redundant wording, which required no changes to libc++. 2075 was a
rewrite of the requirements for forward progress, and again, requires no changes
to the library.
llvm-svn: 204724
Also mark #2104 as complete. Leave the implementation in libc++ as noexcept, since
implementations are allowed to add noexcept to non-virtual calls. If we throw from
unique_lock& operator=(unique_lock&& u), then that means the preconditions were violated,
and calling terminate() (as a result of throwing from a noexcept function) is as
good example of undefined behavior as any other.
llvm-svn: 204653
This is as straightforward as it sounds, a renamed from shared_mutex to
shared_timed_mutex.
Note that libcxx .dylib and .so files built with c++14 support need to
be rebuilt.
llvm-svn: 204078
Marshall Clow