There does not seem to be a reason that we can not support PHI nodes outside of
the scop that reference values within the SCoP. Or at least, the attached test
case seems to do the right thing. We remove the assert for now.
llvm-svn: 200427
In rare cases, a region R which is itself not valid has an indirect child region
that is valid. When R becomes part of a valid region by expansion of another
region, then all children of R have to be erased from the set of valid regions.
This patch ensures that indirect children are erased in addition to direct
children.
Contributed-by: Armin Groesslinger <armin.groesslinger@uni-passau.de>
Tobias: I added a reduced test case and adjusted the logic of the patch to
only recurse until the first child is found.
llvm-svn: 200411
Array base addresses need to be invariant in the region considered. The base
address has to be computed outside the region, or, when it is computed inside,
the value must not change with the iterations of the loops. For example, when a
two-dimensional array is represented as a pointer to pointers the base address
A[i] in an access A[i][j] changes with i; therefore, such regions have to be
rejected.
Contributed by: Armin Größlinger <armin.groesslinger@uni-passau.de>
llvm-svn: 200314
This is not only not necessary, but in case -03 changes this can actually
cause arbitrarily failing test cases such as, e.g., a recent change by Chandler
that caused -O3 to unroll the loop body, which made the loop we wanted to
detect disappear and consequently this test case fail.
llvm-svn: 200204
Count the number of computational steps that have been used to solve the
dependence problem and abort in case we reach the "compute-out". This ensures we
do not hang forever in cases the dependence problem is too difficult to solve.
There is just a single case in the LLVM test-suite that runs into the
compute-out. Even in this case, we can probably coalesce some of the parameters
(i32 b, i32 b zext i64, ...) to simplify the problem enough to not hit the
compute out. However, for now we set the compute out in place to address the
general issue. The compute out was choosen such that it stops on a recent laptop
after about 8 seconds.
llvm-svn: 200156
We now report the following:
$ polly-clang -O3 -mllvm -polly -mllvm -polly-report test.c -c \
-gline-tables-only
note: Polly detected an optimizable loop region (scop) in function 'foo'
test.c:2: Start of scop
test.c:3: End of scop
note: Polly detected an optimizable loop region (scop) in function 'bar'
test.c:9: Start of scop
test.c:13: End of scop
llvm-svn: 197558
When constructing a scop sometimes the exact representation of a statement or
condition would be very complex, but there is a common case which is a lot
simpler, but which is only valid under certain assumptions. The assumed context
records the assumptions taken during the construction of this scop and that need
to be code generated as a run-time test.
At the moment, we do not yet model any assumptions, but only added the
AssumedContext as well as the isl-ast generation support. As a next step,
this needs to be hooked up with the isl code generation.
if (1) /* run-time condition */
{ /* optimized code */ }
else
{ /* original code */ }
llvm-svn: 193652
SCoP invariant parameters with the different start value would deter parameter
sharing. For example, when compiling the following C code:
void foo(float *input) {
for (long j = 0; j < 8; j++) {
// SCoP begin
for (long i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
float x = input[j * 64 + i + 1];
input[j * 64 + i] = x * x;
}
}
}
Polly would creat two parameters for these memory accesses:
p_0: {0,+,256}
p_2: {4,+,256}
[j * 64 + i + 1] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = p_1 + 4i0
[j * 64 + i] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = p_0 + 4i0
These parameters only differ from start value. To enable parameter sharing,
we split the start value from SCEVAddRecExpr, so they would share a single
parameter that always has zero start value:
p0: {0,+,256}<%for.cond1.preheader>
[j * 64 + i + 1] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = 4 + p_1 + 4i0
[j * 64 + i] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = p_0 + 4i0
Such translation can make the polly-dependence much faster.
Contributed-by: Star Tan <tanmx_star@yeah.net>
llvm-svn: 187728
In case we detect that the schedule the user wants to import is invalid we
refuse it _and_ free the isl_maps containing it.
Another bug found thanks to Rafael.
llvm-svn: 187339
We now use __isl_take to annotate the uses of the isl_set where we got the
memory management wrong.
Thanks to Rafael! His pipefail work hardened our test environment and exposed
this bug nicely.
llvm-svn: 187338
Ensure that the scalar write access corresponds to the result of a load
instruction appears after the generic read access corresponds to the load
instruction.
llvm-svn: 186419
Previously this happend to work for integers up to i64, but we got it wrong
for larger numbers. Fix this and add test cases to verify this keeps working.
Reported by: Sven Verdoolaege <skimo at kotnet dot org>
llvm-svn: 183986
When a region header is part of a loop, then all entering edges of this region
should not come from the loop but outside the region. Otherwise, the loop may be
only partially part of the region, which would cause troubles in handling
induction variables.
Currently, we can only model induction variables that are either fully part of
the scop (loop induction variable) or induction variables that are scop-
invariant (parameter). A loop that is only partially part of the
scop causes troubles, as there is no good way to handle the induction
variable in the independent blocks pass.
Contributed-by: Star Tan <tanmx_star@yeah.net>
llvm-svn: 183800
The original test case showed a problem with the independet blocks pass and
we decided to XFAIL it for now. Unfortunately the failure is not detected if
we build without asserts and the verification of the independent block pass
is not run. This change tests now for the actual reason of the failure and
should trigger even in a non asserts build. We did not yet solve the underlying
bug, but this should at least make the test suite behavior consistent.
llvm-svn: 183025
When the Polly code generation was written we did not correctly update the
LoopInfo data, but still claimed that the loop information is correct. This
does not only lead to missed optimizations, but it can also cause
miscompilations in case passes such as LoopSimplify are run after Polly.
Reported-by: Sergei Larin <slarin@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 181987
BeforeBB
|
v
GuardBB
/ \
__ PreHeaderBB \
/ \ / |
latch HeaderBB |
\ / \ /
< \ /
\ /
ExitBB
This does not only remove the need for an explicit loop rotate pass, but it also
gives us the possibility to skip the construction of the guard condition in case
the loop is known to be executed at least once. We do not yet exploit this, but
by implementing this analysis in the isl code generator we should be able to
remove more guards than the generic loop rotate pass can. Another point is that
loop rotation can introduce additional PHI nodes, which may hide that a loop can
be executed in parallel. This change avoids this complication and will make it
easier to move the openmp code generation into a separate pass.
llvm-svn: 181986
Use the new cl::OptionCategory support to move the Polly options into a separate
option category. The aim is to hide most options and show by default only the
options a user needs to influence '-O3 -polly'. The available options probably
need some care, but here is the current status:
Polly Options:
Configure the polly loop optimizer
-enable-polly-openmp - Generate OpenMP parallel code
-polly - Enable the polly optimizer (only at -O3)
-polly-no-tiling - Disable tiling in the scheduler
-polly-only-func=<function-name> - Only run on a single function
-polly-report - Print information about the activities
of Polly
-polly-vectorizer - Select the vectorization strategy
=none - No Vectorization
=polly - Polly internal vectorizer
=unroll-only - Only grouped unroll the vectorize
candidate loops
=bb - The Basic Block vectorizer driven by
Polly
llvm-svn: 181295
In the classical (non -polly-codegen-scev) mode, we assume that we can always
recreate PHI nodes during code generation. This is not true. We can only
reconstruct them from the polyhedral information, in case the entire loop of the
PHI node is part of the SCoP and consequently the PHI node was translated in
the polyhedral description.
llvm-svn: 179674
Tobias Grosser