OpenCL 2.0 introduces the notion of memory scopes in atomic operations to
global and local memory. These scopes restrict how synchronization is
achieved, which can result in improved performance.
This change extends existing notion of synchronization scopes in LLVM to
support arbitrary scopes expressed as target-specific strings, in addition to
the already defined scopes (single thread, system).
The LLVM IR and MIR syntax for expressing synchronization scopes has changed
to use *syncscope("<scope>")*, where <scope> can be "singlethread" (this
replaces *singlethread* keyword), or a target-specific name. As before, if
the scope is not specified, it defaults to CrossThread/System scope.
Implementation details:
- Mapping from synchronization scope name/string to synchronization scope id
is stored in LLVM context;
- CrossThread/System and SingleThread scopes are pre-defined to efficiently
check for known scopes without comparing strings;
- Synchronization scope names are stored in SYNC_SCOPE_NAMES_BLOCK in
the bitcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723
llvm-svn: 307722
G_SEQUENCE is going away soon so as a first step the MachineIRBuilder needs to
be taught how to emulate it with alternatives. We use G_MERGE_VALUES where
possible, and a sequence of G_INSERTs if not.
llvm-svn: 306119
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Make sure IRTranslator->MachineIRBuilder->DebugLoc doesn't
outlive the DILocation. Clear it at the end of
IRTranslator::runOnMachineFunction
llvm-svn: 303277
This exposes a method in MachineFrameInfo that calculates
MaxCallFrameSize and calls it after instruction selection in the ARM
target.
This avoids
ARMBaseRegisterInfo::canRealignStack()/ARMFrameLowering::hasReservedCallFrame()
giving different answers in early/late phases of codegen.
The testcase shows a particular nasty example result of that where we
would fail to properly align an alloca.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32622
llvm-svn: 302303
Adds a new method finalizeLowering to TargetLoweringBase. This is in
preparation for an upcoming commit.
This function is meant for target specific adjustments to
MachineFrameInfo or register reservations.
Move the freezeRegisters() and the hasCopyImplyingStackAdjustment()
handling into the new function to prove the concept. As an added bonus
GlobalISel no longer missed the hasCopyImplyingStackAdjustment()
handling with this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32621
llvm-svn: 301679
This showed up in r300535/r300537, which were reverted in r300538 due to
some of the introduced tests in there failing on some bots, due to the
non-determinism fixed in this commit.
Re-committing r300535/r300537 will add 2 tests for the change in this
commit.
llvm-svn: 300663
This patch changes the behavior of IRTranslating intrinsics where we
now create VREG + G_CONSTANT for ConstantInt values. We already do this
for FloatingPoint values. This makes it easier for the backends to
select code and it won't have to de-duplicate creation+selection of
constants.
Reviewed by: ab
llvm-svn: 298473
MI can represent fallthrough to layout successor blocks, and our
post-isel representation uses that extensively.
We might as well use it too, to avoid translating and carrying along
unnecessary branches.
llvm-svn: 298459
This commit adds a parameter that lets us pass in the calling convention
of the call to CallLowering::lowerCall. This allows us to handle
situations where the calling convetion of the callee is different from
that of the caller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31039
llvm-svn: 298254
Currently, we create a G_CONSTANT for every "synthetic" integer
constant operand (for instance, for the G_GEP offset).
Instead, share the G_CONSTANTs we might have created by going through
the ValueToVReg machinery.
When we're emitting synthetic constants, we do need to get Constants from
the context. One could argue that we shouldn't modify the context at
all (for instance, this means that we're going to use a tad more memory
if the constant wasn't used elsewhere), but constants are mostly
harmless. We currently do this for extractvalue and all.
For constant fcmp, this does mean we'll emit an extra COPY, which is not
necessarily more optimal than an extra materialized constant.
But that preserves the current intended design of uniqued G_CONSTANTs,
and the rematerialization problem exists elsewhere and should be
resolved with a single coherent solution.
llvm-svn: 297875
Now that we preserve the IR layout, we would end up with all the newly
synthesized switch comparison blocks at the end of the function.
Instead, use a hopefully more reasonable layout, with the comparison
blocks immediately following the switch comparison blocks.
llvm-svn: 297869
It makes the output function layout more predictable; the layout has
an effect on performance, we don't want it to be at the mercy of the
translator's visitation order and such.
The predictable output is also easier to digest.
getOrCreateBB isn't appropriately named anymore, as it never needs to
create anything. Rename it and extract the MBB creation logic out of it.
A couple tests were sensitive to the order. Update them.
llvm-svn: 297868
Summary:
<1 x Ty> is not a legal vector type in LLT, we shouldn’t build G_MERGE_VALUES
instruction for them.
Reviewers: qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, dsanders, t.p.northover, ab, javed.absar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: dberris, rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30948
llvm-svn: 297792
We don't need to check whether the fallback path is enabled to return
false. Just do that all the time on error cases, the caller knows (or
at least should know!) how to handle the failing case.
llvm-svn: 297535
The good reason to do this is that static allocas are pretty simple to handle
(especially at -O0) and avoiding tracking DBG_VALUEs throughout the pipeline
should give some kind of performance benefit.
The bad reason is that the debug pipeline is an unholy mess of implicit
contracts, where determining whether "DBG_VALUE %reg, imm" actually implies a
load or not involves the services of at least 3 soothsayers and the sacrifice
of at least one chicken. And it still gets it wrong if the variable is at SP
directly.
llvm-svn: 297410
Summary:
This will allow future patches to inspect the details of the LLT. The implementation is now split between
the Support and CodeGen libraries to allow TableGen to use this class without introducing layering concerns.
Thanks to Ahmed Bougacha for finding a reasonable way to avoid the layering issue and providing the version of this patch without that problem.
The problem with the previous commit appears to have been that TableGen was including CodeGen/LowLevelType.h instead of Support/LowLevelTypeImpl.h.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, ab, javed.absar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, mgorny, dberris, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30046
llvm-svn: 297241
Some intrinsics take metadata parameters. These all need custom
handling of some form, and cannot possibly be lowered generically to
G_INTRINSIC calls with vreg operands.
Reject them, instead of hitting an assert later in getOrCreateVReg.
llvm-svn: 297209
When we translate a no-op (same type) bitcast, we try to be clever and
only emit a COPY if we already assigned a vreg to the defined value.
However, when we didn't, we tried to assign to a reference into the
ValToVReg DenseMap, even though the RHS of the assignment
(getOrCreateVReg) could potentially grow that DenseMap, invalidating the
reference.
Avoid that by getting the source vreg first.
I audited the rest of the translator; this is the only tricky case.
The test is quite unwieldy, as the problem is caused by the DenseMap
growing, which happens after the 47th mapped value.
llvm-svn: 297208
More module problems. This time it only showed up in the stage 2 compile of
clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules-2 but not the stage 1 compile.
Somehow, this change causes the build to need Attributes.gen before it's been
generated.
llvm-svn: 297188
Summary:
This will allow future patches to inspect the details of the LLT. The implementation is now split between
the Support and CodeGen libraries to allow TableGen to use this class without introducing layering concerns.
Thanks to Ahmed Bougacha for finding a reasonable way to avoid the layering issue and providing the version of this patch without that problem.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, ab, javed.absar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, mgorny, dberris, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30046
llvm-svn: 297177
A bit more painful than G_INSERT because it was more widely used, but this
should simplify the handling of extract operations in most locations.
llvm-svn: 297100
Summary:
This will allow future patches to inspect the details of the LLT. The implementation is now split between
the Support and CodeGen libraries to allow TableGen to use this class without introducing layering concerns.
Thanks to Ahmed Bougacha for finding a reasonable way to avoid the layering issue and providing the version of this patch without that problem.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, ab, javed.absar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, mgorny, dberris, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30046
llvm-svn: 296474
We were stopping the translation of the parent block when the
translation of an instruction failed, but we were still trying to
translate the other blocks of the parent function.
Don't do that.
llvm-svn: 296047
Konstantin Zhuravlyov