Now for real. The use case supported previously is used by approximately nobody.
What's needed is support for matching argument comments in EXPECT_xxx calls to
the names of parameters of the mocked methods.
llvm-svn: 294193
Summary:
The misc-argument-comment check now ignores leading and trailing underscores and
case. The new `StrictMode` local/global option can be used to switch back to
strict checking.
Add getLocalOrGlobal version for integral types, minor cleanups.
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, Prazek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23135
llvm-svn: 277729
clang-tidy checks are organized into modules. This refactoring moves the misc
module checks into the namespace clang::tidy::misc
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7996
Patch by Richard Thomson!
llvm-svn: 230950
Summary:
Each check can implement readOptions and storeOptions methods to read
and store custom options. Each check's options are stored in a local namespace
to avoid name collisions and provide some sort of context to the user.
Reviewers: bkramer, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5296
llvm-svn: 217661
parameter packs.
Summary:
This disables this check for std::bind and similar functions that use
parameter packs to forward arguments to a different function. Name of the
parameter pack argument doesn't matter.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5168
llvm-svn: 217039
Haven't thought that I ever needed to do this, but in this case comparing the
index using pointer arithmetic turns out to be really ugly. It also generates
nasty sign-compare warnings on 32 bit targets.
llvm-svn: 214705
This checks that parameters named in comments that appear before arguments in
function and constructor calls match the parameter name used in the callee's
declaration. For example:
void f(int x, int y);
void g() {
f(/*y=*/0, /*z=*/0);
}
contains two violations of the policy, as the names 'x' and 'y' used in the
declaration do not match names 'y' and 'z' used at the call site.
I think there is significant value in being able to check/enforce this policy
as a way of guarding against accidental API misuse and silent breakages
caused by API changes.
Although this pattern appears somewhat frequently in the LLVM codebase,
this policy is not prescribed by the LLVM coding standards at the moment,
so it lives under 'misc'.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2914
llvm-svn: 204113
Alexander Kornienko