-enable-si-insert-waitcnts=1 becomes the default
-enable-si-insert-waitcnts=0 to use old pass
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33730
llvm-svn: 304551
Summary:
The goal is for each operand type to have its own parse function and
at the same time share common code for tracking state as different
instruction types share operand types (e.g. glc/glc_flat, etc).
Introduce parseAMDGPUOperand which can parse any optional operand.
DPP and Clamp/OMod have custom handling for now. Sam also suggested
to have class hierarchy for operand types instead of table. This
can be done in separate change.
Remove parseVOP3OptionalOps, parseDS*OptionalOps, parseFlatOptionalOps,
parseMubufOptionalOps, parseDPPOptionalOps.
Reduce number of definitions of AsmOperand's and MatchClasses' by using common base class.
Rename AsmMatcher/InstPrinter methods accordingly.
Print immediate type when printing parsed immediate operand.
Use 'off' if offset/index register is unused instead of skipping it to make it more readable (also agreed with SP3).
Update tests.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, SamWot, artem.tamazov
Subscribers: qcolombet, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19584
llvm-svn: 268015
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_DWORD[_X2,X3,X4] and mostly behave like
llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format. They will be used by Mesa for SSBO and
atomic counters at least when robust buffer access behavior is desired.
(These instructions perform no format conversion and do buffer range checking
per component.)
As a side effect of sharing patterns with llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format,
it has become trivial to add support for the f32 and v2f32 variants of that
intrinsic, so the patch does so.
Also DAG-ify (and fix) some tests that I noticed intermittent failures in
while developing this patch.
Some tests were (temporarily) adjusted for the required mayLoad/hasSideEffects
changes to the BUFFER_STORE_DWORD* instructions. See also
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18291.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18292
llvm-svn: 266126
This makes it possible to distinguish between mesa shaders
and other kernels even in the presence of compute shaders.
Patch By: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18559
llvm-svn: 265589
Summary:
Allow the selection of BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_x and _XY. Do this now before
the frontend patches land in Mesa. Eventually, we may want to automatically
reduce the size of loads at the LLVM IR level, which requires such overloads,
and in some cases Mesa can generate them directly.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18255
llvm-svn: 263792
Summary:
We cannot easily deduce that an offset is in an SGPR, but the Mesa frontend
cannot easily make use of an explicit soffset parameter either. Furthermore,
it is likely that in the future, LLVM will be in a better position than the
frontend to choose an SGPR offset if possible.
Since there aren't any frontend uses of these intrinsics in upstream
repositories yet, I would like to take this opportunity to change the
intrinsic signatures to a single offset parameter, which is then selected
to immediate offsets or voffsets using a ComplexPattern.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18218
llvm-svn: 263790
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
Mark Searles