When using in-process cc1, the Clang Interface Stubs pipeline setup
exposes an ASAN bug. I am still investigating this issue but want to
green the bots for now. I don't think this is a huge issue since the
Clang Interface Stubs Driver setup code is the only code path that sets
up such a pipeline (ie N cc1's for N c files followed by another N cc1's
for to generate stub files for the same N c files).
This issue is being discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D69825.
If a resolution is not found soon, a bugzilla filling will be in order.
Add a simple cache for constraint satisfaction results. Whether or not this simple caching
would be permitted in final C++2a is currently being discussed but it is required for
acceptable performance so we use it in the meantime, with the possibility of adding some
cache invalidation mechanisms later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72552
Do not export __llvm_profile_counter_bias when profiling is enabled
because this symbol is hidden and cannot be exported.
Should fix this bot error:
```
URL: http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage1-RA/5678/consoleFull
Problem: Command Output (stdout):
--
ld: warning: cannot export hidden symbol ___llvm_profile_counter_bias
from
/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-RA/clang-build/lib/clang/11.0.0/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.profile_osx.a(InstrProfilingBiasVar.c.o)
ld: warning: cannot export hidden symbol ___llvm_profile_counter_bias
from
/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-RA/clang-build/lib/clang/11.0.0/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.profile_osx.a(InstrProfilingBiasVar.c.o)
```
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
Summary:
We previously listed first declared members, then implicit operator=,
then implicit operator==, then implicit destructors. Per discussion on
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/88, put the implicit
equality comparison operators at the very end, after all special member
functions.
This reinstates add2b7e44a, reverted in
commit 89e43f04ba, with a fix for 32-bit
targets.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72897
The issue was reported by @xazax.hun here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69825#1827826
"This patch (D69825) breaks scan-build-py which parses the output of "-###" to get -cc1 command. There might be other tools with the same problems. Could we either remove (in-process) from CC1Command::Print or add a line break?
Having the last line as a valid invocation is valuable and there might be tools relying on that."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72982
When Wrange-loop-analysis issues a diagnostic on a dependent type in a
template the diagnostic may not be valid for all instantiations. Therefore
the diagnostic is suppressed during the instantiation. Non dependent types
still issue a diagnostic.
The same can happen when using macros. Therefore the diagnostic is
disabled for macros.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44556
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73007
Summary: Just an NFC code cleanup i stumbled upon when stumbling through clang alignment attribute handling.
Reviewers: erichkeane, gchatelet, courbet, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72993
Summary:
We shouldn't be just giving up if we find one of them
(like we currently do with `AssumeAlignedAttr`),
we should emit them all.
As the tests show, even if we materialized good knowledge
from `__attribute__((assume_aligned(32)`, it doesn't mean
`__attribute__((alloc_align([...])))` info won't be useful.
It might be, but that isn't given.
Reviewers: erichkeane, jdoerfert, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72979
When constrained floating point is enabled the SystemZ-specific builtins
don't use constrained intrinsics in some cases. Fix that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72722
This change replaces the manual building of executable paths
using llvm::sys::path::append with GetProgramPath.
This enables adding other paths in case executables reside
in different directories and makes the code easier to read.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72903
Summary:
This patch resumes the work of D16586.
According to the AAPCS, volatile bit-fields should
be accessed using containers of the widht of their
declarative type. In such case:
```
struct S1 {
short a : 1;
}
```
should be accessed using load and stores of the width
(sizeof(short)), where now the compiler does only load
the minimum required width (char in this case).
However, as discussed in D16586,
that could overwrite non-volatile bit-fields, which
conflicted with C and C++ object models by creating
data race conditions that are not part of the bit-field,
e.g.
```
struct S2 {
short a;
int b : 16;
}
```
Accessing `S2.b` would also access `S2.a`.
The AAPCS Release 2019Q1.1
(https://static.docs.arm.com/ihi0042/g/aapcs32.pdf)
section 8.1 Data Types, page 35, "Volatile bit-fields -
preserving number and width of container accesses" has been
updated to avoid conflict with the C++ Memory Model.
Now it reads in the note:
```
This ABI does not place any restrictions on the access widths
of bit-fields where the container overlaps with a non-bit-field member.
This is because the C/C++ memory model defines these as being separate
memory locations, which can be accessed by two threads
simultaneously. For this reason, compilers must be permitted to use a
narrower memory access width (including splitting the access
into multiple instructions) to avoid writing to a different memory location.
```
I've updated the patch D16586 to follow such behavior by verifying that we
only change volatile bit-field access when:
- it won't overlap with any other non-bit-field member
- we only access memory inside the bounds of the record
Regarding the number of memory accesses, that should be preserved, that will
be implemented by D67399.
Reviewers: rsmith, rjmccall, eli.friedman, ostannard
Subscribers: ostannard, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits, carwil, olista01
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72932
This patch broke the Sanitizer buildbots. Please see the commit's
differential revision for more information
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678).
This reverts commit b72a8c65e4.
Target regions have implicit outer region which may erroneously capture
some globals when it should not. It may lead to a compiler crash at the
compile time.
Summary:
clang-format currently treats the nullish coalescing operator `??` like
the ternary operator. That causes multiple nullish terms to be each
indented relative to the last `??`, as they would in a ternary.
The `??` operator is often used in chains though, and as such more
similar to other binary operators, such as `||`. So to fix the indent,
set its token type to `||`, so it inherits the same treatment.
This opens up the question of operator precedence. However, `??` is
required to be parenthesized when mixed with `||` and `&&`, so this is
not a problem that can come up in syntactically legal code.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73026
Summary:
Printing policy was not propogated to functiondecls when creating a
completion string which resulted in canonical template parameters like
`foo<type-parameter-0-0>`. This patch propogates printing policy to those as
well.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/76
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72715
Summary:
We previously listed first declared members, then implicit operator=,
then implicit operator==, then implicit destructors. Per discussion on
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/88, put the implicit
equality comparison operators at the very end, after all special member
functions.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72897
a temporary.
We previously failed to materialize a temporary when performing an
implicit conversion to a reference type, resulting in our thinking the
argument was a value rather than a reference in some cases.
Summary: This diff expands the SpacesAroundConditions option added in D68346 to include adding spaces to catch statements.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch by: timwoj
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72793
Summary:
The documentation for IndentCaseLabels claimed that the "Switch
statement body is always indented one level more than case labels". This
is technically false for the code block immediately following the label.
Its closing bracket aligns with the start of the label.
If the case label are not indented, it leads to a style where the
closing bracket of the block aligns with the closing bracket of the
switch statement, which can be hard to parse.
This change introduces a new option, IndentCaseBlocks, which when true
treats the block as a scope block (which it technically is).
(Note: regenerated ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst using tools/dump_style.py)
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: capn
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72276
Implement support for C++2a requires-expressions.
Re-commit after compilation failure on some platforms due to alignment issues with PointerIntPair.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50360
Puyan Lotfi