Summary:
This causes the issue in PR26872 to go away now that we aren't creating
symbols for the string literals, but that may just be concealing a
deeper problem, so best to keep that PR open.
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: Bigcheese, llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17971
llvm-svn: 262968
It was a badly specified hack for when a tls relocation should be
propagated to the dynamic relocation table.
This replaces it with a not as bad hack of saying that a local dynamic
tls relocation is never preempted.
I will try to remove even that second hack in the next patch.
llvm-svn: 262955
self.expect() had two problems:
- If there was a substrs argument, then it overwrote the variable containing
the command to run with the last substr. That meant nonsense command text in
testsuite errors.
- The actual output is not printed, which makes fixing testsuite failures a bit
annoying (you end up having to use the -tv arguments to dotest).
This fixes both of these issues. We could do even better, pretty-printing the
criteria for "correct" output, but this at least makes dealing with errors a bit
better.
llvm-svn: 262950
Add a missing include. This is important in the case HandleLLVMOptions is
included prior to the missing CheckCXXSourceCompiles or CheckCXXCompilerFlag
which includes CheckCXXSourceCompiles.
llvm-svn: 262949
The System-V x86_64 ABI requires floating point values to be passed
in 128-but SSE vector registers (xmm0, ...). When printing such a
variable this currently yields an <invalid load address>.
This patch makes LLDB's DWARF expression evaluator accept 128-bit
registers as scalars. It also relaxes the check that the size of the
result of the DWARF expression be equal to the size of the variable to a
greater-than. DWARF defers to the ABI how smaller values are being placed
in a larger register.
Implementation note: I found the code in Value::SetContext() that changes
the m_value_type after the fact to be questionable. I added a sanity check
that the Value's memory buffer has indeed been written to (this is
necessary, because we may have a scalar value in a vector register), but
really I feel like this is the wrong place to be setting it.
Reviewed by Greg Clayton.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17897
rdar://problem/24944340
llvm-svn: 262947
The fix consisting in using the library call for atomic compare and swap when
the instruction is not safe to use may be incorrect. Indeed the library call may
not exist on all platform. In other words, we need a better fix!
llvm-svn: 262943
It was causing errors like
/lib/libc.so.6 is incompatible with elf_x86_64
when linking on Fedora.
Every system has different default paths. It seems better to just trust
the driver to pass the correct -L options.
This reverts commit 262910.
llvm-svn: 262941
This is one of a series of changes to improve the MSVC visualization of Clang types.
This one focuses on Record and SubstTemplateTypeParmType meaning that, for example,
a TemplateArgumentLoc no longer displays incomprehensibly in the locals window as
{Argument={DeclArg={Kind=1 QT=0x033acb00 D=0xcccccccc {DeclType=???}}...
but instead much more usefully as
Type template parameter: SubstTemplateTypeParm: {Identifier (("T"))} => Record, {Identifier (("A"))}
Additional types and improvements will be made in subsequent commits
llvm-svn: 262933
Summary: I left --build-system for backwards compat, in case there are scripts using it. Feel free to ask for its removal too.
Reviewers: chapuni, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17886
llvm-svn: 262924
Similar to the template cases in r262050, when a C++ method in an
unavailable struct/class calls unavailable API, don't diagnose an error.
I.e., this case was failing:
void foo() __attribute__((unavailable));
struct __attribute__((unavailable)) A {
void bar() { foo(); }
};
Since A is unavailable, A::bar is allowed to call foo. However, we were
emitting a diagnostic here. This commit checks up the context chain
from A::bar, in a manner inspired by SemaDeclAttr.cpp:isDeclUnavailable.
I expected to find other related issues but failed to trigger them:
- I wondered if DeclBase::getAvailability should check for
`TemplateDecl` instead of `FunctionTemplateDecl`, but I couldn't find
a way to trigger this. I left behind a few extra tests to make sure
we don't regress.
- I wondered if Sema::isFunctionConsideredUnavailable should be
symmetric, checking up the context chain of the callee (this commit
only checks up the context chain of the caller). However, I couldn't
think of a testcase that didn't require first referencing the
unavailable type; this, we already diagnose.
rdar://problem/25030656
llvm-svn: 262921
Davide Italiano