... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse, and therefore printed in the wrong order by
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effects, especially for
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attribute's order was changed instead.
It also causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be textually
after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes are
merged, but are incompatible. Interchanging the role of the the main
and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where two different
declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple attributes of the
same declaration) are merged to be reversed. There is no easy fix
because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway, which often is on the same line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
llvm-svn: 335084
When looking up a template name, we can find an overload set containing a
function template and an unresolved non-type using declaration.
llvm-svn: 334106
The added test case was triggering assertion
> Assertion failed: (!SpecializedTemplate.is<SpecializedPartialSpecialization*>() && "Already set to a class template partial specialization!"), function setInstantiationOf, file clang/include/clang/AST/DeclTemplate.h, line 1825.
It was happening with ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl
`enable_if_not_same<int, int>`. Because this template is specialized for
equal types not to have a definition, it wasn't instantiated and its
specialization kind remained TSK_Undeclared. And because it was implicit
instantiation, we didn't mark the decl as invalid. So when we try to
find the best matching partial specialization the second time, we hit
the assertion as partial specialization is already set.
Fix by reusing stored partial specialization when available, instead of
looking for the best match every time.
rdar://problem/39524996
Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46909
llvm-svn: 332509
After a fatal error Sema::InstantiatingTemplate doesn't allow further
instantiation and doesn't push a CodeSynthesisContext. When we tried to
synthesize implicit deduction guides from constructors we hit the
assertion
> Assertion failed: (!CodeSynthesisContexts.empty() && "Cannot perform an instantiation without some context on the " "instantiation stack"), function SubstType, file clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp, line 1580.
Fix by avoiding deduction guide synthesis if InstantiatingTemplate is invalid.
rdar://problem/39051732
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46446
llvm-svn: 332307
If the name after 'template' is an unresolved using declaration (not containing
'typename'), then we don't yet know if it's a valid template-name, so don't
reject it prior to instantiation. Instead, treat it as naming a dependent
member of the current instantiation.
llvm-svn: 332291
For 'x::template y', consistently give a "no member named 'y' in 'x'"
diagnostic if there is no such member, and give a 'template keyword not
followed by a template' name error if there is such a member but it's not a
template. In the latter case, add a note pointing at the non-template.
Don't suggest inserting a 'template' keyword in 'X::Y<' if X is dependent
if the lookup of X::Y was actually not a dependent lookup and found only
non-templates.
llvm-svn: 332076
I found that explicit template parameters that caused a
narrowing integer conversion resulted in the incorrect parameter
being mentioned in the note (see test attached). This is because
the argument checking code doesn't check to see if it caused
SFINAE errors when checking the arguments, so instead of giving
up on the first error, it continues through the list. This
makes the error reporting pick up the last template param every time.
This patch checks these parameters on each argument and gives up
if there is an error. The result is that only the required amount
of arguments are checked, and that the 'Converted' array contains
only the successful arguments before the first failure, as the
calls seem to all expect.
llvm-svn: 331651
template arguments.
This fixes some cases where we'd incorrectly accept "A::template B" when B is a
kind of template that requires template arguments (in particular, a variable
template or a concept).
llvm-svn: 331013
The diagnostic system for Clang can already handle many AST nodes. Instead
of converting them to strings first, just hand the AST node directly to
the diagnostic system and let it handle the output. Minor changes in some
diagnostic output.
llvm-svn: 328688
Summary:
This fixes PR33561 and PR34185.
Don't store pending template instantiations for late-parsed templates in
the normal PendingInstantiations queue. Instead, use a separate list
that will only be parsed and instantiated at end of TU when late
template parsing actually works and doesn't infinite loop.
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis, hans
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44846
llvm-svn: 328567
More generally, this permits a template to be specialized in any scope in which
it could be defined, so this also supersedes DR44 and DR374 (the latter of
which we previously only implemented in C++11 mode onwards due to unclarity as
to whether it was a DR).
llvm-svn: 327705
template parameter that is an expanded parameter pack, only substitute into the
current slice, not the entire pack.
This reduces the checking of N template template arguments for an expanded
parameter pack containing N parameters from quadratic time to linear time in
the length of the pack. This is important because one (and possibly the only?)
general technique for splitting a template parameter pack in linear time
depends on doing this.
llvm-svn: 326973
When we synthesize an implicit inner initializer list when analyzing an outer
initializer list, we add it to the outer list immediately, and then fill in the
inner list. This gives the outer list no chance to update its *-dependence bits
with those of the completed inner list. To fix this, re-add the inner list to
the outer list once it's completed.
Note that we do not recompute the *-dependence bits from scratch when we
complete an outer list; this would give the wrong result for the case where a
designated initializer overwrites a dependent initializer with a non-dependent
one. The resulting list in that case should still be dependent, even though all
traces of the dependence were removed from the semantic form.
llvm-svn: 324537
We could in principle support such pack expansion, using techniques similar to
what we do for pack expansion of lambdas, but it's not clear it's worthwhile.
For now at least, cleanly reject these cases rather than crashing.
llvm-svn: 324160
each kind.
Attribute instantiation would previously default to instantiating each kind of
attribute only once. This was overridden by a flag whose intended purpose was
to permit attributes from a prior declaration to be inherited onto a new
declaration even if that new declaration had its own copy of the attribute.
This is the wrong behavior: when instantiating attributes from a template, we
should always instantiate all the attributes that were written on that
template.
This patch renames the flag in the Attr class (and TableGen sources) to more
clearly identify what it's actually for, and removes the usage of the flag from
template instantiation. I also removed the flag from AlignedAttr, which was
only added to work around the incorrect suppression of duplicate attribute
instantiation.
llvm-svn: 321834
The way to fix an undefined-template warning is to add lines to the header file that defines the template pattern. We should suppress the warnings when the template pattern is in a system header because we don't expect users to edit those.
llvm-svn: 321665
An unscoped enumeration used as template argument, should not have any
qualified information about its enclosing scope, as its visibility is
global.
In the case of scoped enumerations, they must include information
about their enclosing scope.
Patch by Carlos Alberto Enciso!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39239
llvm-svn: 321312
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
Fixes the -Wreorder issue and fixes the ast-dump-color.cpp test.
llvm-svn: 321310
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
llvm-svn: 321223
update the type from the definition even if we didn't instantiate a definition.
We may have instantiated the definition in an earlier stage of semantic
analysis, after creating the DeclRefExpr but before we reach a point where a
complete expression type is required.
llvm-svn: 320709
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
of its argument, perform function-to-pointer and array-to-pointer decay on the
parameter type first.
Otherwise deduction will fail, as the type of the argument will be decayed.
llvm-svn: 319584
deduction for invalid functions
The fabricated template parameters cause an assertion because their depth
is invalid.
rdar://34109988
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37341
llvm-svn: 316778
constant expressions.
We permit array-to-pointer decay on such arrays, but disallow pointer
arithmetic (since we do not know whether it will have defined behavior).
This is based on r311970 and r301822 (the former by me and the latter by Robert
Haberlach). Between then and now, two things have changed: we have committee
feedback indicating that this is indeed the right direction, and the code
broken by this change has been fixed.
This is necessary in C++17 to continue accepting certain forms of non-type
template argument involving arrays of unknown bound.
llvm-svn: 316245
instantiation declarations if they are usable from constant expressions.
We are permitted to instantiate in these cases, and required to do so in order
to have an initializer available for use within constant evaluation.
llvm-svn: 316136
Currently Clang uses default address space (0) to represent private address space for OpenCL
in AST. There are two issues with this:
Multiple address spaces including private address space cannot be diagnosed.
There is no mangling for default address space. For example, if private int* is emitted as
i32 addrspace(5)* in IR. It is supposed to be mangled as PUAS5i but it is mangled as
Pi instead.
This patch attempts to represent OpenCL private address space explicitly in AST. It adds
a new enum LangAS::opencl_private and adds it to the variable types which are implicitly
private:
automatic variables without address space qualifier
function parameter
pointee type without address space qualifier (OpenCL 1.2 and below)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35082
llvm-svn: 315668
Modifying a non-type template integer arguement that is causing errors
in some builds as it's too large for 32-bit longs. This hopefully (and
seems to when testing) should fix all of the build bot errors relating
to this test. I also modified the name of the function call to be more
apt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33666
llvm-svn: 314668
Adding regression test for Dependent Address Spaces in relation to
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33666 I forgot to svn add the test file
before commiting the prior changes. I appologies.
llvm-svn: 314650
This implements the proposed approach in https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/33
This reinstates r313827, reverted in r313856, with a fix for the 'out-of-bounds
enumeration value' ubsan error in that change.
llvm-svn: 313955
Sema::InstantiateClass should check only exception specs added during
class instantiation and ignore already present delayed specs. This fixes
a case where we instantiate a class before parsing member initializers,
check exceptions for a different class and fail to find a member
initializer. Which is required for comparing exception specs for
explicitly-defaulted and implicit default constructor. With the fix we
are still checking exception specs but only after member initializers
are present.
Removing errors in crash-unparsed-exception.cpp is acceptable according
to discussion in PR24000 because other compilers accept code in
crash-unparsed-exception.cpp as valid.
rdar://problem/34167492
Reviewers: davide, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: dim, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37881
llvm-svn: 313906
When enable_if disables a particular overload resolution candidate,
rummage through the enable_if condition to find the specific condition
that caused the failure. For example, if we have something like:
template<
typename Iter,
typename = std::enable_if_t<Random_access_iterator<Iter> &&
Comparable<Iterator_value_type<Iter>>>>
void mysort(Iter first, Iter last) {}
and we call "mysort" with "std::list<int>" iterators, we'll get a
diagnostic saying that the "Random_access_iterator<Iter>" requirement
failed. If we call "mysort" with
"std::vector<something_not_comparable>", we'll get a diagnostic saying
that the "Comparable<...>" requirement failed.
llvm-svn: 307196
Summary:
This patch aims to fix the bug reported at
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33189. Clang hits an assertion
when a template destructor declaration is present. This is caused by
later processing that does not expect to encounter a template when
looking at a destructor. The resolution is to treat the destructor as
being not declared when later processing is interested in the properties
of the destructor of a class.
Reviewers: rcraik, hubert.reinterpretcast, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33833
Patch by Kuang He!
llvm-svn: 306905
This is not required by the standard (yet), but there seems to be reasonable
support for this being a defect according to CWG discussion, and libstdc++ 7.1
relies on it working.
llvm-svn: 304946
template is valid with or without it (with different meanings).
If we see "dependent.x<...", and what follows the '<' is a valid expression,
we must parse the '<' as a comparison rather than a template angle bracket.
When we later come to instantiate, if we find that the LHS of the '<' actually
names an overload set containing function templates, produce a diagnostic
suggesting that the 'template' keyword was missed rather than producing a
mysterious diagnostic saying that the function must be called (and pointing
at what looks to already be a function call!).
llvm-svn: 304852
template partial specialization.
In passing, fix the deduction-crash.cpp test to actually run all the tests. Due
to a typo, the last third of the file was being skipped by the parser and some
of the tests were not actually testing anything as a result. Switch from
FileCheck to -verify to make the problem more obvious and prevent this
happening again.
llvm-svn: 304604
When an undeclared identifier in a context that requires a type is followed by
'<', only look for type templates when typo-correcting, tweak the diagnostic
text to say that a template name (not a type name) was undeclared, and parse
the template arguments when recovering from the error.
llvm-svn: 302732
The heuristic that we use here is:
* the left-hand side must be a simple identifier or a class member access
* the right-hand side must be '<' followed by either a '>' or by a type-id that
cannot be an expression (in particular, not followed by '(' or '{')
* there is a '>' token matching the '<' token
The second condition guarantees the expression would otherwise be ill-formed.
If we're confident that the user intended the name before the '<' to be
interpreted as a template, diagnose the fact that we didn't interpret it
that way, rather than diagnosing that the template arguments are not valid
expressions.
llvm-svn: 302615
This improves our behavior in a few ways:
* We now guarantee that if a member is marked as being a member
specialization, there will actually be a member specialization declaration
somewhere on its redeclaration chain. This fixes a crash in modules builds
where we would try to check that there was a visible declaration of the
member specialization and be surprised to not find any declaration of it at
all.
* We don't set the source location of the in-class declaration of the member
specialization to the out-of-line declaration's location until we have
actually finished merging them. This fixes some very silly looking
diagnostics, where we'd point a "previous declaration is here" note at the
same declaration we're complaining about. Ideally we wouldn't mess with the
prior declaration's location at all, but too much code assumes that the
first declaration of an entity is a reasonable thing to use as an indication
of where it was declared, and that's not really true for a member
specialization unless we fake it like this.
llvm-svn: 302596
The code implements Richard Smith suggestion in comment 3 of the PR.
reviewer: Vassil Vassilev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31540
llvm-svn: 300443
This reverts an attempt to check that types match when matching a
dependently-typed non-type template parameter. (This comes up when matching the
parameters of a template template parameter against the parameters of a
template template argument.)
The matching rules here are murky at best. Our behavior after this revert is
definitely wrong for certain C++17 features (for 'auto' template parameter
types within the parameter list of a template template argument in particular),
but our behavior before this revert is wrong for some pre-existing testcases,
so reverting to our prior behavior seems like our best option.
llvm-svn: 300262
Printing typedefs or type aliases using clang_getTypeSpelling() is missing the
namespace they are defined in. This is in contrast to other types that always
yield the full typename including namespaces.
Patch by Michael Reiher!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29944
llvm-svn: 297465
compiler is run in a mode where the default C++ standard is newer than C++03.
The reason is because one of the warnings checked is only produced when the
compiler is using C++03 or lower.
This change fixes this problem as well as adds explicit run lines to run the
test in C++03 and C++11 modes.
llvm-svn: 296066
A 'decltype(auto)' parameter can match any other kind of non-type template
parameter, so should be usable in place of any other parameter in a template
template argument. The standard is sadly extremely unclear on how this is
supposed to work, but this seems like the obviously-correct result.
It's less clear whether an 'auto' parameter should be able to match
'decltype(auto)', since the former cannot be used if the latter turns out to be
used for a reference type, but if we disallow that then consistency suggests we
should also disallow 'auto' matching 'T' for the same reason, defeating
intended use cases of the feature.
llvm-svn: 295866
We need to look through the PackExpansionType in the parameter type when
deducing, and we need to consider the possibility of deducing arguments for
packs that are not lexically mentioned in the pattern (but are nonetheless
deducible) when figuring out which packs are covered by a pack deduction scope.
llvm-svn: 295790
template deduction guides for class template argument deduction.
Ensure that we have a local instantiation scope for tracking the instantiated
parameters. Additionally, unusually, we're substituting at depth 1 and leaving
depth 0 alone; make sure that we don't reduce template parameter depth by 2 for
inner parameters in the process. (This is probably also broken for alias
templates in the case where they're expanded within a dependent context, but
this patch doesn't fix that.)
llvm-svn: 295696
This appears to be the only template argument deduction context where we were
missing this check. Surprisingly, other implementations also appear to miss
the check in this case; it may turn out that important code is relying on
the widespread non-conformance here, in which case we'll need to reconsider.
llvm-svn: 295277
that has been explicitly specialized!
We assume in various places that we can tell the template specialization kind
of a class type by looking at the declaration produced by TagType::getDecl.
That was previously not quite true: for an explicit specialization, we could
have first seen a template-id denoting the specialization (with a use that does
not trigger an implicit instantiation of the defintiion) and then seen the
first explicit specialization declaration. TagType::getDecl would previously
return an arbitrary declaration when called on a not-yet-defined class; it
now consistently returns the most recent declaration in that case.
llvm-svn: 295118
This change adds a new type node, DeducedTemplateSpecializationType, to
represent a type template name that has been used as a type. This is modeled
around AutoType, and shares a common base class for representing a deduced
placeholder type.
We allow deduced class template types in a few more places than the standard
does: in conditions and for-range-declarators, and in new-type-ids. This is
consistent with GCC and with discussion on the core reflector. This patch
does not yet support deduced class template types being named in typename
specifiers.
llvm-svn: 293207
Under this defect resolution, the injected-class-name of a class or class
template cannot be used except in very limited circumstances (when declaring a
constructor, in a nested-name-specifier, in a base-specifier, or in an
elaborated-type-specifier). This is apparently done to make parsing easier, but
it's a pain for us since we don't know whether a template-id using the
injected-class-name is valid at the point when we annotate it (we don't yet
know whether the template-id will become part of an elaborated-type-specifier).
As a tentative resolution to a perceived language defect, mem-initializer-ids
are added to the list of exceptions here (they generally follow the same rules
as base-specifiers).
When the reference to the injected-class-name uses the 'typename' or 'template'
keywords, we permit it to be used to name a type or template as an extension;
other compilers also accept some cases in this area. There are also a couple of
corner cases with dependent template names that we do not yet diagnose, but
which will also get this treatment.
llvm-svn: 292518
The rules around typechecking deduced template arguments during partial
ordering are not clear, and while the prior behavior does not seem to be
correct (it doesn't follow the general model of partial ordering where each
template parameter is replaced by a non-dependent but unique value), the new
behavior is also not clearly right and breaks some existing idioms.
The new behavior is retained for dealing with non-type template parameters
with 'auto' types, as without it even the most basic uses of that feature
don't work. We can revisit this once CWG has come to an agreement on how
partial ordering with 'auto' non-type template parameters is supposed to
work.
llvm-svn: 292183
properly even when a non-type template parameter has a dependent type.
Previously, if a non-type template parameter was dependent, but not dependent
on an outer level of template parameter, we would not match the type of the
parameter. Under [temp.arg.template], we are supposed to check that the types
are equivalent, which means checking for syntactic equivalence in the dependent
case.
This also fixes some accepts-invalids when passing templates with auto-typed
non-type template parameters as template template arguments.
llvm-svn: 291512
Check for implicit conversion sequences for non-dependent function
template parameters between deduction and substitution. The idea is to accept
as many cases as possible, on the basis that substitution failure outside the
immediate context is much more common during substitution than during implicit
conversion sequence formation.
This re-commits r290808, reverted in r290811 and r291412, with a couple of
fixes for handling of explicitly-specified non-trailing template argument
packs.
llvm-svn: 291427
This issue clarifies how deduction proceeds past a non-trailing function
parameter pack. Essentially, the pack itself is skipped and consumes no
arguments (except for those implied by an explicitly-specified template
arguments), and nothing is deduced from it. As a small fix to the standard's
rule, we do not allow subsequent deduction to change the length of the function
parameter pack (by preventing extension of the explicitly-specified pack if
present, and otherwise deducing all contained packs to empty packs).
llvm-svn: 291425
Check for implicit conversion sequences for non-dependent function
template parameters between deduction and substitution. The idea is to accept
as many cases as possible, on the basis that substitution failure outside the
immediate context is much more common during substitution than during implicit
conversion sequence formation.
This re-commits r290808, reverted in r290811, with a fix for handling of
explicitly-specified template argument packs.
llvm-svn: 291410
deduction in partial ordering.
This prevents us from crashing due to attempting to instantiate the same class
template specialization definition multiple times. (Debug builds also appear to
sometimes hit the stack limit before hitting the instantiation depth limit in
this case.)
llvm-svn: 291407
This implements something like the current direction of DR1581: we use a narrow
syntactic check to determine the set of places where a constant expression
could be evaluated, and only instantiate a constexpr function or variable if
it's referenced in one of those contexts, or is odr-used.
It's not yet clear whether this is the right set of syntactic locations; we
currently consider all contexts within templates that would result in odr-uses
after instantiation, and contexts within list-initialization (narrowing
conversions take another victim...), as requiring instantiation. We could in
principle restrict the former cases more (only const integral / reference
variable initializers, and contexts in which a constant expression is required,
perhaps). However, this is sufficient to allow us to accept libstdc++ code,
which relies on GCC's behavior (which appears to be somewhat similar to this
approach).
llvm-svn: 291318
We were previously incorrectly using TDK_TooFewArguments to report a template
argument list that's too short, but it actually means that the number of
arguments in a top-level function call was insufficient. When diagnosing the
problem, SemaOverload would (rightly) assert that the failure kind didn't make
any sense.
llvm-svn: 291064
When a parameter pack has multiple corresponding arguments, and some subset of
them are overloaded functions, it's possible that some subset of the parameters
are non-deduced contexts. In such a case, keep deducing from the remainder of
the arguments, and resolve the incomplete pack against whatever other
deductions we've performed for the pack.
GCC, MSVC, and ICC give three different bad behaviors for this case; what we do
now (and what we did before) don't exactly match any of them, sadly :( I'm
getting a core issue opened to specify more precisely how this should be
handled.
llvm-svn: 290923
Michael Kruse