This implements the rule intended by the standard (see LWG 2358)
and the rule intended by the Itanium C++ ABI (see
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/51), and makes
Clang match the behavior of GCC, ICC, and MSVC.
A pedantic reading of both the standard and the ABI indicate that Clang
is currently technically correct, but that's not worth much when it's
clear that the wording is wrong in both those places.
This is an ABI break for classes that derive from a class that is empty
other than one or more unnamed non-zero-length bit-fields. Such cases
are expected to be rare, but -fclang-abi-compat=6 restores the old
behavior just in case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45174
llvm-svn: 331620
alignment is ignored, and they always allocate a complete
storage unit.
Also, change the dumping of AST record layouts: use the more
readable C++-style dumping even in C, include bitfield offset
information in the dump, and don't print sizeof/alignof
information for fields of record type, since we don't do so
for bases or other kinds of field.
rdar://22275433
llvm-svn: 245514
Note: __declspec is also temporarily enabled when compiling for a CUDA target because there are implementation details relying on __declspec(property) support currently. When those details change, __declspec should be disabled for CUDA targets.
llvm-svn: 238238
Empty records do not always have size equivalent to their alignment.
They only do so when their alignment is at least as large as the minimum
empty struct size: 1 byte in C++ and 4 bytes in C.
llvm-svn: 218661
The MS ABI has a notion of 'required alignment' for fields; this
alignment supercedes pragma pack directives.
MSVC takes into account alignment attributes on typedefs when
determining whether or not a field has a certain required alignment.
Do the same in clang by tracking whether or not we saw such an attribute
when calculating the type's bitwidth and alignment.
This fixes PR20418.
Reviewers: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4714
llvm-svn: 214274
We would correctly insert sufficiently aligned padding between vbases
when our leading base was empty, however we would neglect to increase
the required alignment of the most derived class.
This fixes PR20315.
llvm-svn: 213123
In version 9 (VS2010) (and prior)? versions of msvc, if the last field
in a record was a bitfield padding equal to the size of the storage
class of that bitfield was added before each vbase and vtordisp. This
patch removes that feature from clang and updates the lit tests to
reflect it.
llvm-svn: 206004
When __declspec(align()) is applied to a bitfield it affects the
alignment rather than the required alignment of the struct. The major
feature that this patch adds is that the alignment of the structure
obeys the alignment of __declspec(align()) from the bitfield over the
value specified in pragma pack.
Test cases are included.
The patch also includes some small cleanups in recordlayoutbuilder and
some cleanups to some lit tests, including line endings (but no
functionality change to lit tests)
llvm-svn: 205994
Some lines intended to be used for testing x86_64 ABI compatibility were
not firing because lines were annotated with the wrong FileCheck prefix:
X64 vs C64
llvm-svn: 201453
vptr injection must inject padding equivalent to the alignment of the
most aligned non-virtual subobject, not the alignment of the enclosing
record.
To fascilitate this change, don't let record layout observe the
alignment of the record until we've injected our vptrs. Also, do not
allow the alignment of vbases to affect required alignment until just
before we insert the vtordisp field.
llvm-svn: 201199
Some lines intended to be used for testing x86_64 ABI compatibility were
not firing because lines were annotated with the wrong FileCheck prefix:
X64 vs x64
N.B. Changes beyond just changing x64 to X64 were made, presumably
because other parts of the layout engine have changed. I've verified
the changes to make sure that MSVC creates a compatible layout.
llvm-svn: 200670
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.
To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545
llvm-svn: 199250
This patch makes a small behavioral change to the interaction between
pack and alignment. Specifically it makes __declspec(align()) on a
field change that field's alignment without respect to pack but the
alignment change to the record alignment as a whole still obeys pack.
llvm-svn: 199172
This patch moves the check for pragma pack until after the application
of __declspec align to before pragma pack. This causes observable
changes in the use of tail padding for bases. A test case is included.
llvm-svn: 199154
This patch more cleanly seperates the concepts of Preferred Alignment
and Required Alignment. Most notable that changes to Required Alignment
do *not* impact preferred alignment until late in struct layout. This
is observable when using pragma pack and non-virtual bases and the use
of tail padding when laying them out.
Test cases included.
llvm-svn: 198988
__declspec(align), when applied to bitfields affects their perferred
alignment instead of their required alignment. We don't know why.
Also, #pragma pack(n) turns packing *off* if n is greater than the
pointer size. This is now observable because of the impact of
declspec(align) on bitfields.
llvm-svn: 198907
This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The
most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the
fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest
for the first base/field after the vbptr.
llvm-svn: 198818
With pragma pack, the layout engine would produce vfptrs that were
packed width rather than pointer width. This patch addresses the issue
and adds a test case.
llvm-svn: 198059
Prior to this patch, the alignment imposed by virtual bases only
included direct virtual bases. This patch fixes it to look at all
virtual bases.
llvm-svn: 196997
__declspec(align())
This patch implements required alignment in a way that makes
__declspec(align()) and #pragma pack play correctly together. In the
MS-ABI, __declspec(align()) is a hard rule and cannot be overridden by
#pragma pack. This cases each record to have two interesting alignments
"preferred alignment" (which matches Itanium's concept of alignment) and
"required alignment" which is an alignment that must never be violated,
even in the case of #pragma pack. This patch introduces the concept of
Required Alignment to the record builder and tracks/uses it
appropriately. Test cases are included.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2283
llvm-svn: 196549
Richard Smith