Summary:
Optimization remark format is slightly changed by LLVM patch D49412.
Two tests are fixed with expected messages changed.
Frankly speaking I have not tested this change yet. I will test when manage to setup the project.
Reviewers: xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50241
llvm-svn: 338971
Summary:
Optimization remark format is slightly changed by LLVM patch D49412.
One test is fixed with expected messages changed.
Frankly speaking I have not tested this change yet. I will test when manage to setup the project.
Reviewers: xbolva00, espindola
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, steven_wu, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50242
llvm-svn: 338970
Summary:
This patch improves Inliner to provide causes/reasons for negative inline decisions.
1. It adds one new message field to InlineCost to report causes for Always and Never instances. All Never and Always instantiations must provide a simple message.
2. Several functions that used to return the inlining results as boolean are changed to return InlineResult which carries the cause for negative decision.
3. Changed remark priniting and debug output messages to provide the additional messages and related inline cost.
4. Adjusted tests for changed printing.
Patch by: yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Reviewers: craig.topper, sammccall, sgraenitz, NutshellySima, shchenz, chandlerc, apilipenko, javed.absar, tejohnson, dblaikie, sanjoy, eraman, xbolva00
Reviewed By: tejohnson, xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, llvm-commits, arsenm, mehdi_amini, eraman, haicheng, steven_wu, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49412
llvm-svn: 338969
There are a bunch of edge cases and inconsistencies in how we're emitting sections
cause this warning to fire and it needs more work.
This reverts commit r335558.
llvm-svn: 338968
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/IT3
Comes up in the [most ugliest] signed int -> signed char case of
-fsanitize=implicit-conversion (https://reviews.llvm.org/D50250)
Not sure if we want to do it always, or only when it is free to invert.
llvm-svn: 338967
These forward declarations for various classes in the Type
hierarchy are not needed since they are all forward declared
systematically a few lines below.
llvm-svn: 338966
Looks like the only reason we use a unique_ptr here is so that we can
conditionally construct a LogicalErrorHandler. It's a small type, and
Optional can do the same thing with 100% fewer heap allocations.
llvm-svn: 338962
This allows us to model the common LLVM idiom of incrementing
immediately after dereferencing so that we can remove or update the
entity w/o losing our ability to reach the "next".
However, these are not real or proper iterators. They are just enough to
allow range based for loops and very simple range algorithms to work,
but should not be considered full general.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49956
llvm-svn: 338955
Summary:
Previously, in the NewPM pipeline, TailCallElim recalculates the DomTree when it modifies any instruction in the Function.
For example,
```
CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(&I);
...
CI->setTailCall();
Modified = true;
...
if (!Modified || ...)
return PreservedAnalyses::all();
```
After applying this patch, the DomTree only recalculates if needed (plus an extra insertEdge() + an extra deleteEdge() call).
When optimizing SQLite with `-passes="default<O3>"` pipeline of the newPM, the number of DomTree recalculation decreases by 6.2%, the number of nodes visited by DFS decreases by 2.9%. The time used by DomTree will decrease approximately 1%~2.5% after applying the patch.
Statistics:
```
Before the patch:
23010 dom-tree-stats - Number of DomTree recalculations
489264 dom-tree-stats - Number of nodes visited by DFS -- DomTree
After the patch:
21581 dom-tree-stats - Number of DomTree recalculations
475088 dom-tree-stats - Number of nodes visited by DFS -- DomTree
```
Reviewers: kuhar, dmgreen, brzycki, grosser, davide
Reviewed By: kuhar, brzycki
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49982
llvm-svn: 338954
This simplifies the code a bit.
It is NFC except that it removes early exit for Count == 0
which does not seem to be useful (we have no such tests either).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49136
llvm-svn: 338953
I noticed a suspicious failure:
[ RUN ] VMRange.CollectionContains
llvm/src/tools/lldb/unittests/Utility/VMRangeTest.cpp:146: Failure
Value of: VMRange::ContainsRange(collection, VMRange(0x100, 0x104))
Actual: false
Expected: true
Looking at the code, it is a very real bug:
class RangeInRangeUnaryPredicate {
public:
RangeInRangeUnaryPredicate(VMRange range) : _range(range) {} // note that _range binds to a temporary!
bool operator()(const VMRange &range) const {
return range.Contains(_range);
}
const VMRange &_range;
};
This change fixes the bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50290
llvm-svn: 338949
When a non-extended temporary object is created in a conditional branch, the
lifetime of that temporary ends outside the conditional (at the end of the
full-expression). If we're inserting lifetime markers, this means we could end
up generating
if (some_cond) {
lifetime.start(&tmp);
Tmp::Tmp(&tmp);
}
// ...
if (some_cond) {
lifetime.end(&tmp);
}
... for a full-expression containing a subexpression of the form `some_cond ?
Tmp().x : 0`. This patch moves the lifetime start for such a temporary out of
the conditional branch so that we don't need to generate an additional basic
block to hold the lifetime end marker.
This is disabled if we want precise lifetime markers (for asan's
stack-use-after-scope checks) or of the temporary has a non-trivial destructor
(in which case we'd generate an extra basic block anyway to hold the destructor
call).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50286
llvm-svn: 338945
Summary:
Added corpus of arrays to use as inputs for the functions. Check that the two
functions modify the inputted arrays in the same way.
Reviewers: kcc, morehouse
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50194
llvm-svn: 338943
__builtin_memmove (in non-type-punning cases).
This is intended to permit libc++ to make std::copy etc constexpr
without sacrificing the optimization that uses memcpy on
trivially-copyable types.
__builtin_strcpy and __builtin_wcscpy are not handled by this change.
They'd be straightforward to add, but we haven't encountered a need for
them just yet.
This reinstates r338455, reverted in r338602, with a fix to avoid trying
to constant-evaluate a memcpy call if either pointer operand has an
invalid designator.
llvm-svn: 338941
This change allows users pass compression level that was not listed
in the enum. Also, I think using different values than zlib's
compression levels was just confusing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50196
llvm-svn: 338939
This matches the behavior of the ELF linker where -u/--undefined
means symbols will get pulled in from archives but won't result
in link error if they are missing.
Also, don't actually great symbol table entries for the undefined
symbols, again matching more closely the ELF linker.
This also results in simplification of the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50279
llvm-svn: 338938
Some of Apple's public CI nodes ship an lldb which has trouble debugging
the asan-deque.cpp test. Specifically, that lldb appears to either parse
location lists in the test program incorrectly or to have a broken
std::deque data formatter.
We don't want to work around this by weakening the integration test, and
we're unable to update the lldb version on the CI node at the moment.
The compromise is to require AppleLLDB >= 1000 when AppleLLDB is being
used to debug this test.
Reviewed (in person) by Adrian Prantl.
Bot failure:
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-configure-RA/48074
rdar://42892721
llvm-svn: 338937
Libc++ needs to know when aligned allocation is supported by clang, but is
otherwise unavailable at link time. Otherwise, libc++ will incorrectly end up
generating calls to `__builtin_operator_new`/`__builtin_operator_delete` with
alignment arguments.
This patch implements the following changes:
* The `__cpp_aligned_new` feature test macro to no longer be defined when
aligned allocation is otherwise enabled but unavailable.
* The Darwin driver no longer passes `-faligned-alloc-unavailable` when the
user manually specifies `-faligned-allocation` or `-fno-aligned-allocation`.
* Instead of a warning Clang now generates a hard error when an aligned
allocation or deallocation function is referenced but unavailable.
Patch by Eric Fiselier.
Reviewers: rsmith, vsapsai, erik.pilkington, ahatanak, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45015
llvm-svn: 338934
These tests were clearly auto-generated when they were converted to
FileCheck back in r80019 (2009), but we didn't have a fancy script to
keep them up to date then. I've reviewed the diff, and we should be
generating the exact same code sequences we used to.
After this, I plan to commit a change that changes our output slightly,
but in a way that is still correct. It will generate a large diff, and I
want it to be clearly correct, so I am regenerating these checks in
preparation for that.
llvm-svn: 338928
- Remove -asm-verbose=0 from every llc command. The tests still pass.
- Reorder the RUN lines to match CHECKs.
- Use -LABEL like update_llc_test_checks.py does.
llvm-svn: 338927
Put the LLVM IR at the bottom of the function instead of the top. In my
next patch, I will run update_llc_test_checks.py on this file, and I
want to only highlight the diffs in the CHECK lines. Hopefully by doing
this change first, the patch will be more understandable.
llvm-svn: 338926
At one point in time acquire implied mayLoad and mayStore as did release. Thus we needed separate pseudos that also carried that property. This appears to no longer be the case. I believe it was changed in 2012 with a comment saying that atomic memory accesses are marked volatile which preserves the ordering.
So from what I can tell we shouldn't need additional pseudos since they aren't carry any flags that are different from the normal instructions. The only thing I can think of is that we may consider them for load folding candidates in the peephole pass now where we didn't before. If that's important hopefully there's something in the memory operand we can check to prevent the folding without relying on pseudo instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50212
llvm-svn: 338925
Summary:
pudb and pdb interfere with the behavior of the inspect module. calling
`inspect.getfile(inspect.currentframe())` returns a different result
depending on whether or not you're in a debugger. Calling
`os.path.abspath` on the result of `inspect.getfile(...)` normalizes the
result between the two environments.
Patch by Nathan Lanza <lanza@fb.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49620
llvm-svn: 338923
David Bolvansky