If building lld without x86 support, tests that require that support should
be treated as unsupported, not errors.
Tested using:
1. cmake '-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64;X86'
make check-lld
=>
Expected Passes : 1406
Unsupported Tests : 287
2. cmake '-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64'
make check-lld
=>
Expected Passes : 410
Unsupported Tests : 1283
Patch by Joel Jones
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47748
llvm-svn: 334095
I do not fully understand why we had these values in the tests, but
the new value matches what ld.bfd and ld.gold set, so I guess that
was just a mistake.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30441
llvm-svn: 296505
The example reported in PR30793 shows a case where gc reclaims
a SHF_TLS section, but it doesn't reclaim the section containing
the debug info for it.
This is expected, as we do not reclaim non-alloc sections
during the garbage collection phase (and this is not going to
change anytime soon, at least this is what I gathered last I
talked with Rafael about it).
So, we end up with a pending reference, thinking that the input
was invalid (which is not true, as it's GC that removed the
SHT_TLS section, and therefore didn't create the PT_TLS *segment*
for it). In cases like this, just assign a VA of zero at relocation
time instead of error'ing out (this is what gold does as well, FWIW).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26201
llvm-svn: 285735
Joel Jones