Summary:
The issue with the python path is that the path to python on Windows can contain spaces. To make the tests always work, the path to python needs to be surrounded by quotes.
This is a companion change to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50206
Reviewers: asmith, zturner, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, sbc100, arichardson, aheejin, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50282
llvm-svn: 339075
GNU ld's manual says that TARGET(foo) is basically an alias for
`--format foo` where foo is a BFD target name such as elf64-x86-64.
Unlike GNU linkers, lld doesn't allow arbitrary BFD target name for
--format. We accept only "default", "elf" or "binary". This makes
situation a bit tricky because we can't simply make TARGET an alias for
--target.
A quick code search revealed that the usage number of TARGET is very
small, and the only meaningful usage is to switch to the binary mode.
Thus, in this patch, we handle only TARGET(elf.*) and TARGET(binary).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48153
llvm-svn: 339060
During copy relocation of a variable defined in a DSO, if a TLS variable in that DSO happens to have the same st_value, it would also be copied. This was unnecessary because the addresses of TLS variables are relative to TLS segment. They don't interfere with non-TLS variables.
This copying behavior can be harmful in the following scenario:
For function-scope thread-local variables with non-trivial constructors,
they have guard variables. In the case of x86_64 general-dynamic model:
template <int N>
void foo() {
thread_local std::string a;
}
GOT[n] R_X86_64_DTPMOD64 guard variable for a
GOT[n+1] R_X86_64_DTPOFF64 guard variable for a
GOT[n+2] R_X86_64_DTPMOD64 a
GOT[n+3] R_X86_64_DTPOFF64 a
a and its guard variable are both represented as TLS variables, which
should be within the same module. If one is copy relocated to the main
module while the other is not, their module ID will mismatch and can
cause access without prior construction.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50289
llvm-svn: 339042
Add a test for the R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 relocation to an undefined symbol. We
have to use yaml2obj as llvm-mc relaxes the narrow branch to a b.w which
uses the R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 relocation instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50234
llvm-svn: 338999
Summary:
Optimization remark format is slightly changed by LLVM patch D49412.
One test is fixed with expected messages changed.
Frankly speaking I have not tested this change yet. I will test when manage to setup the project.
Reviewers: xbolva00, espindola
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, steven_wu, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50242
llvm-svn: 338970
Some lit tests that call llvm-ar use the 'r' flag. If the target archive
already exists and is in a corrupt state, this can cause the test to fail. We
have added 'rm -f' calls before the llvm-ar calls to increase the
robustness of the tests.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49184
llvm-svn: 338705
Patch by Konstantin Schwarz!
If more than a single output section is added to a PT_LOAD header,
only the first section should set the LMAOffset of the segment.
Otherwise, we get a load-address overlap error
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50133
llvm-svn: 338697
Patch by Konstantin Schwarz!
If both the MemRegion and LMARegion are set for an output section in
a linker script, we should only increase the LMARegion if it is
different from the MemRegion. Otherwise, we reserve the memory twice.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50065
llvm-svn: 338684
Patch by Konstantin Schwarz!
The condition to create a new phdr must also check the usage of "AT>"
linker script command, and create a new PT_LOAD header if a new LMARegion is used.
This fixes PR38307
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50052
llvm-svn: 338679
Some test setups run tests in a read-only path, which means that opening the
default output path (a.out) for write will fail. This change adds appropriate -o
flags so the tests will not fail spuriously.
llvm-svn: 338440
If any of our inputs are bitcode files, the LTO code generator may create
references to certain library functions that might not be explicit in the
bitcode file's symbol table. If any of those library functions are defined
in a bitcode file in an archive member, we need to arrange to use LTO to
compile those archive members by adding them to the link beforehand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50017
llvm-svn: 338434
The Tag_ABI_VFP_args build attribute controls the procedure call standard
used for floating point parameters on ARM. The values are:
0 - Base AAPCS (FP Parameters passed in Core (Integer) registers
1 - VFP AAPCS (FP Parameters passed in FP registers)
2 - Toolchain specific (Neither Base or VFP)
3 - Compatible with all (No use of floating point parameters)
If the Tag_ABI_VFP_args build attribute is missing it has an implicit value
of 0.
We use the attribute in two ways:
- Detect a clash in calling convention between Base, VFP and Toolchain.
we follow ld.bfd's lead and do not error if there is a clash between an
implicit Base AAPCS caused by a missing attribute. Many projects
including the hard-float (VFP AAPCS) version of glibc contain assembler
files that do not use floating point but do not have Tag_ABI_VFP_args.
- Set the EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_SOFT or EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_HARD ELF header flag
for Base or VFP AAPCS respectively. This flag is used by some ELF
loaders.
References:
- Addenda to, and Errata in, the ABI for the ARM Architecture for
Tag_ABI_VFP_args
- Elf for the ARM Architecture for ELF header flags
Fixes PR36009
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49993
llvm-svn: 338377
Summary:
This adds an LLD flag to mark executable LOAD segments execute-only for AArch64 targets.
In AArch64 the expectation is that code is execute-only compatible, so this just adds a linker option to enforce this.
Patch by: ivanlozano (Ivan Lozano)
Reviewers: srhines, echristo, peter.smith, eugenis, javed.absar, espindola, ruiu
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: dokyungs, emaste, arichardson, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49456
llvm-svn: 338271
The xxHash64 function has been made unsigned-char-independent, so
we can reland this change now.
Original commit message:
> The icf-safe.s test currently fails on 32-bit platforms because it uses
> the --print-icf-sections flag and depends on the output appearing in
> a specific order. However, this flag causes the output to depend on
> the order of the sections in the Sections array, which depends on the
> hash values returned from hash_combine, which happen to be different
> for that test between 32-bit and 64-bit platforms.
>
> This change makes the output deterministic by using xxHash64 instead of
> hash_combine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49877
llvm-svn: 338153
The icf-safe.s test currently fails on 32-bit platforms because it uses
the --print-icf-sections flag and depends on the output appearing in
a specific order. However, this flag causes the output to depend on
the order of the sections in the Sections array, which depends on the
hash values returned from hash_combine, which happen to be different
for that test between 32-bit and 64-bit platforms.
This change makes the output deterministic by using xxHash64 instead of
hash_combine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49877
llvm-svn: 338088
We are already ICF'ing these sections as a unit with their dependent
sections, so they don't need to be considered for ICF individually.
This change also "fixes" slowness caused by our quadratic-in-group-size
relocation segregation algorithm on 32-bit ARM platforms with unwind
data and ICF on rodata. In this scenario almost every function's
.ARM.exidx is identical except for the targets of the relocations
that refer to the function and its .ARM.extab, which causes almost
all of the program's .ARM.exidx sections to be initially added to the
same class, which causes us to compare every such section with every
other such section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49716
llvm-svn: 337967
If we fail to merge a secondary GOT with the primary GOT but so far only
one merged GOT has been created (the primary one), the final element in
MergedGots is the primary GOT. Thus we should not try to merge with this
final element passing IsPrimary=false, since this will ignore the fact
that the destination GOT does in fact need a header, and those extra two
entries can be enough to allow the merge to incorrectly occur. Instead
we should check for this case before attempting the second merge.
Patch by James Clarke.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49422
llvm-svn: 337810
The gold behaviour with regard to --keep-unique is arguably a bug.
I also noticed a bug in my patch, which is that we mislink the
following program with --icf=safe by merging f3 and f4:
void f1() {}
void f2() {}
__attribute__((weak)) void* f3() { return f1; }
__attribute__((weak)) void* f4() { return f2; }
int main() {
printf("%p %p\n", f3(), f4());
}
llvm-svn: 337729
Signed values for the FDE PC addr were not correctly handled in
readFdeAddr(). If the value is negative and the type of the value is
smaller than 64 bits, the FDE PC addr overflow error would be
incorrectly triggered.
Fixed readFdeAddr() to properly handle signed values by sign extending
where appropriate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49557
llvm-svn: 337683
Under --icf=all we now only apply KeepUnique to non-executable
address-significant sections. This has the effect of making --icf=all
mean unsafe ICF for executable sections and safe ICF for non-executable
sections.
With this change the meaning of the KeepUnique bit changes to
"does the current ICF mode (together with the --keep-unique and
--ignore-data-address-equality flags) require this section to be
kept unique".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49626
llvm-svn: 337640
The only restriction is that we cannot merge more than one KeepUnique
section together. This matches gold's behaviour and reduces code size
when using --icf=safe.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49622
llvm-svn: 337638
George Rimar