Partial fix for the above radar.
Call ThreadList::Clear() in the ThreadList destructor so if any other threads currently have the thread list mutex, we won't destroy the list for them while they are using it. ThreadList::Clear() takes the mutex and clears the thread list contents.
llvm-svn: 178257
- Includes a stub for AVX support in the x86-64 register context and a failing test for register sets that are unavailable.
Thanks to Greg Clayton for his review feedback.
llvm-svn: 178252
- All Linux logging channels now use a single global instance of lldb_private::Log, to handle the case of logging during process tear down.
- Also removed a single use of LogSP in FreeBSD and fixed a typo in a comment while reading through ProcessKDPLog.
Reviewed by Daniel Malea.
llvm-svn: 178242
Holding the Python lock while we call the Python C API to post-process objects returned from the OS plugins
This should avoid issues where some Python objects get invalidated while we are in the middle of processing them and we end up with an invalid Python state and a crash
llvm-svn: 178206
LLDB is crashing when logging is enabled from lldb-perf-clang. This has to do with the global destructor chain as the process and its threads are being torn down.
All logging channels now make one and only one instance that is kept in a global pointer which is never freed. This guarantees that logging can correctly continue as the process tears itself down.
llvm-svn: 178191
With this notion, if parties outside the ScriptInterpreter itself need to acquire a lock on script APIs, they can do so by a pattern like this:
{
auto lock = interpeter->AcquireInterpreterLock();
// do whatever you need to do...
} // lock will automatically be released here
This might be useful for classes that use the Python convenience objects (e.g. PythonDictionary) to ensure they keep the underlying interpreter in a safe and controlled condition while they call through the C API functions
Of course, the ScriptInterpreter still manages its internal locking correctly when necessary :-)
llvm-svn: 178189
The algorithm to access an item in a __NSArrayM was not reacting properly to deletions
The fix is to use a smarter formula that accounts for items shifting and the resulting notion of offsets in the table
llvm-svn: 178076
- Making an error message more consistent
- Ensuring the element size is not zero before using it in a modulus
- Properly using target settings to cap the std::list element count
- Removing spurious element size calculations that were unused
- Removing spurious capping in std::map
llvm-svn: 178057
ValueObjects themselves use DumpValueObjectOptions as the currency for the same purpose
The code to convert between these two units was replicated (to varying degrees of correctness) in several spots in the code
This checkin provides one and only one (and hopefully correct :-) entry point for this conversion
llvm-svn: 178044
Functions in "(anonymous namespace)" was causing LLDB to crash when trying to complete a type and it would also cause functions arguments to appear in wrong place in frame display when showing function arguments.
llvm-svn: 177965
Make register read and write accept $<regname> as valid.
This allows:
(lldb) reg read rbx
rbx = 0x0000000000000000
(lldb) reg read $rbx
rbx = 0x0000000000000000
(lldb) reg write $rbx 1
(lldb) reg read $rbx
rbx = 0x0000000000000001
to function correctly
It is not done at the RegisterContext level because we should keep the internal API clean of this user-friendly behavior and name registers appropriately.
If this ends up being needed in more places we can reconsider.
llvm-svn: 177961
Ensure that option -Y also works for expression as it does for frame variable
Also, if the user passes an explicit format specifier when printing a variable, override the summary's decision to hide the value.
This is required for scenarios like this to work:
(lldb) p/x c
(Class) $0 = 0x0000000100adb7f8 NSObject
Previously this would say:
(lldb) p/x c
(Class) $0 = NSObject
ignoring the explicit format specifier
llvm-svn: 177893
Making value objects properly iterable in constructs of the form
[ x for x in value_with_children ]
This would previously cause an endless loop because lacking a proper iterator object, Python will keep calling __getitem__() with increasing values of the index until it gets an IndexError
since SBValue::GetValueForExpressionPath() supports synthetic array members, no array index will ever really cause an IndexError to be raised, hence the endless iteration
class value_iter is an implementation of __iter__() that provides a terminating iterator over a value
llvm-svn: 177885
Enrico Granata