The constructs %hi() and %lo() represent the high and low 16
bits of the address.
Because the 16 bit offset field of an LW instruction is
interpreted as signed, if bit 15 of the low part is 1 then the
low part will act as a negative and 1 needs to be added to the
high part.
Contributer: Vladimir Medic
llvm-svn: 175707
This patch implements the PPCDAGToDAGISel::PostprocessISelDAG virtual
method to perform post-selection peephole optimizations on the DAG
representation.
One optimization is implemented here: folds to clean up complex
addressing expressions for thread-local storage and medium code
model. It will also be useful for large code model sequences when
those are added later. I originally thought about doing this on the
MI representation prior to register assignment, but it's difficult to
do effective global dead code elimination at that point. DCE is
trivial on the DAG representation.
A typical example of a candidate code sequence in assembly:
addis 3, 2, globalvar@toc@ha
addi 3, 3, globalvar@toc@l
lwz 5, 0(3)
When the final instruction is a load or store with an immediate offset
of zero, the offset from the add-immediate can replace the zero,
provided the relocation information is carried along:
addis 3, 2, globalvar@toc@ha
lwz 5, globalvar@toc@l(3)
Since the addi can in general have multiple uses, we need to only
delete the instruction when the last use is removed.
llvm-svn: 175697
Rewrite value numbers directly in the 'Other' LiveInterval which is
moribund anyway. This avoids allocating the OtherAssignments vector.
llvm-svn: 175690
excluding visibility bits.
Mips specific standalone assembler directive "set at".
This directive changes the general purpose register
that the assembler will use when given the symbolic
register name $at.
This does not include negative testing. That will come
in a future patch.
A side affect of this patch recognizes the different
GPR register names for temporaries between old abi
and new abi so a test case for that is included.
Contributer: Vladimir Medic
llvm-svn: 175686
When findReachingDefs() finds that only one value can reach the basic
block, just copy the work list of visited blocks directly into the live
interval.
Sort the block list and use a LiveRangeUpdater to make the bulk add
fast.
When multiple reaching defs are found, transfer the work list to the
updateSSA() work list as before. Also use LiveRangeUpdater in
updateLiveIns() following updateSSA().
This makes live interval analysis more than 3x faster on one huge test
case.
llvm-svn: 175685
The slot that we're adding/removing the attribute from may not be the same as
the attribute coming in. Make sure that they match up before we try to
add/remove them.
PR15313
llvm-svn: 175684
related failures when running 'make check' without LiveVariables with the
verifier enabled. Some of the remaining failures elsewhere may still be fallout
from incorrect updating of LiveIntervals or the few missing cases left in the
two-address pass.
llvm-svn: 175672
(2xi32) (truncate ((2xi64) bitcast (buildvector i32 a, i32 x, i32 b, i32 y)))
can be folded into a (2xi32) (buildvector i32 a, i32 b).
Such a DAG would cause uneccessary vdup instructions followed by vmovn
instructions.
We generate this code on ARM NEON for a setcc olt, 2xf64, 2xf64. For example, in
the vectorized version of the code below.
double A[N];
double B[N];
void test_double_compare_to_double() {
int i;
for(i=0;i<N;i++)
A[i] = (double)(A[i] < B[i]);
}
radar://13191881
Fixes bug 15283.
llvm-svn: 175670
This handles the cases where the 6-bit splat element is odd, converting
to a three-instruction sequence to add or subtract two splats. With this
fix, the XFAIL in test/CodeGen/PowerPC/vec_constants.ll is removed.
llvm-svn: 175663
Adding new segments to large LiveIntervals can be expensive because the
LiveRange objects after the insertion point may need to be moved left or
right. This can cause quadratic behavior when adding a large number of
segments to a live range.
The LiveRangeUpdater class allows the LIveInterval to be in a temporary
invalid state while segments are being added. It maintains an internal
gap in the LiveInterval when it is shrinking, and it has a spill area
for new segments when the LiveInterval is growing.
The behavior is similar to the existing mergeIntervalRanges() function,
except it allocates less memory for the spill area, and the algorithm is
turned inside out so the loop is driven by the clients.
llvm-svn: 175644
- When extloading from a vector with non-byte-addressable element, e.g.
<4 x i1>, the current logic breaks. Extend the current logic to
fix the case where the element type is not byte-addressable by loading
all bytes, bit-extracting/packing each element.
llvm-svn: 175642
The PPC backend doesn't handle these correctly. This patch uses logic
similar to that in the X86 and ARM backends to track these arguments
properly.
llvm-svn: 175635
Add HexagonMCInst class which adds various Hexagon VLIW annotations.
In addition, this class also includes some APIs related to the
constant extenders.
llvm-svn: 175634
During lowering of a BUILD_VECTOR, we look for opportunities to use a
vector splat. When the splatted value fits in 5 signed bits, a single
splat does the job. When it doesn't fit in 5 bits but does fit in 6,
and is an even value, we can splat on half the value and add the result
to itself.
This last optimization hasn't been working recently because of improved
constant folding. To circumvent this, create a pseudo VADD_SPLAT that
can be expanded during instruction selection.
llvm-svn: 175632
sext <4 x i1> to <4 x i64>
sext <4 x i8> to <4 x i64>
sext <4 x i16> to <4 x i64>
I'm running Combine on SIGN_EXTEND_IN_REG and revert SEXT patterns:
(sext_in_reg (v4i64 anyext (v4i32 x )), ExtraVT) -> (v4i64 sext (v4i32 sext_in_reg (v4i32 x , ExtraVT)))
The sext_in_reg (v4i32 x) may be lowered to shl+sar operations.
The "sar" does not exist on 64-bit operation, so lowering sext_in_reg (v4i64 x) has no vector solution.
I also added a cost of this operations to the AVX costs table.
llvm-svn: 175619
It is possible that frame pointer is not found in the
callee saved info, thus FramePtrSpillFI may be incorrect
if we don't check the result of hasFP(MF).
Besides, if we enable the stack coloring algorithm, there
will be an assertion to ensure the slot is live. But in
the test case, %var1 is not live in the prologue of the
function, and we will get the assertion failure.
Note: There is similar code in ARMFrameLowering.cpp.
llvm-svn: 175616
NAKAMURA Takumi