This is the same way GenericSelectionExpr works, and it's generally a
more consistent approach.
A large part of this patch is devoted to caching the value of the condition
of a ChooseExpr; it's needed to avoid threading an ASTContext into
IgnoreParens().
Fixes <rdar://problem/14438917>.
llvm-svn: 186738
Summary: In ARC mode, clang emits a warning if the result of an 'init' method is unused but miss cases where the method does not follows the Cocoa naming convention but is properly declared as an init family method.
CC: cfe-commits, eli.friedman
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1163
llvm-svn: 186718
method declaration into its implementation to
prevent a bogus warning about mismatched attributes.
then make sure the warning about missing call to super comes out
of the method implementation. // rdar://14251387
llvm-svn: 185974
-performSelector: and friends return a value that is boxed as an Objective-C
pointer. Sometimes it is an Objective-C pointer, sometimes it isn't.
Some clients may wish to silence this warning based on calling
this method.
Fixes <rdar://problem/14147304>
llvm-svn: 184789
in addition of receiver having static type, but also when
receiver has dynamic type (of 'id' variety) as well as when
receiver is of 'Class' type vareity. // rdar://7853549
llvm-svn: 184195
protocols that declare the same property of incompatible
types, issue a warning when class implementation synthesizes
the property. // rdar://13075400
llvm-svn: 182316
found for a receiver, note where receiver class
is declaraed (this is most common when receiver is a forward
class). // rdar://3258331
llvm-svn: 181847
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180973
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180970
Previously it would point to the left bracket or the receiver, which can be particularly
problematic if the receiver is a block literal and we end up point the diagnostic far away
for the selector that is complaining about.
rdar://13620447
llvm-svn: 180833
patch -n r180198.
When reporting on missing property accessor implementation in
categories, do not report when they are declared in primary class,
class's protocol, or one of it super classes or in of the other
categories. // rdar://13713098
llvm-svn: 180580
categories, do not report when they are declared in primary class,
class's protocol, or one of it super classes. This is because,
its class is going to implement them. // rdar://13713098
llvm-svn: 180198
Aaron Ballman