There is not an official documented ABI for frame pointers in Thumb2,
but we should try to emit something which is useful.
We use r7 as the frame pointer for Thumb code, which currently means
that if a function needs to save a high register (r8-r11), it will get
pushed to the stack between the frame pointer (r7) and link register
(r14). This means that while a stack unwinder can follow the chain of
frame pointers up the stack, it cannot know the offset to lr, so does
not know which functions correspond to the stack frames.
To fix this, we need to push the callee-saved registers in two batches,
with the first push saving the low registers, fp and lr, and the second
push saving the high registers. This is already implemented, but
previously only used for iOS. This patch turns it on for all Thumb2
targets when frame pointers are required by the ABI, and the frame
pointer is r7 (Windows uses r11, so this isn't a problem there). If
frame pointer elimination is enabled we still emit a single push/pop
even if we need a frame pointer for other reasons, to avoid increasing
code size.
We must also ensure that lr is pushed to the stack when using a frame
pointer, so that we end up with a complete frame record. Situations that
could cause this were rare, because we already push lr in most
situations so that we can return using the pop instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23516
llvm-svn: 279506
We use to track quite a few "adjusted" offsets through the FrameLowering code
to account for changes in the prologue instructions as we went and allow the
emission of correct CFA annotations. However, we were missing a couple of cases
and the code was almost impenetrable.
It's easier to just add any stack-adjusting instruction to a list and emit them
together.
llvm-svn: 222057
When we folded the DPR alignment gap into a push, we weren't noting the extra
distance from the beginning of the push to the FP, and so FP ended up pointing
at an incorrect offset.
The .cfi_def_cfa_offset directives are still wrong in this case, but I think
that can be improved by refactoring.
llvm-svn: 222056
We were making an attempt to do this by adding an extra callee-saved GPR (so
that there was an even number in the list), but when that failed we went ahead
and pushed anyway.
This had a couple of potential issues:
+ The .cfi directives we emit misplaced dN because they were based on
PrologEpilogInserter's calculation.
+ Unaligned stores can be less efficient.
+ Unaligned stores can actually fault (likely only an issue in niche cases,
but possible).
This adds a final explicit stack adjustment if all other options fail, so that
the actual locations of the registers match up with where they should be.
llvm-svn: 221320
Oliver Stannard