Summary:
This patch is the MVP version of importing the std module into the expression parser to improve C++ debugging.
What happens in this patch is that we inject a `@import std` into our expression source code. We also
modify our internal Clang instance for parsing this expression to work with modules and debug info
at the same time (which is the main change in terms of LOC). We implicitly build the `std` module on the first use. The
C++ include paths for building are extracted from the debug info, which means that this currently only
works if the program is compiled with `-glldb -fmodules` and uses the std module. The C include paths
are currently specified by LLDB.
I enabled the tests currently only for libc++ and Linux because I could test this locally. I'll enable the tests
for other platforms once this has landed and doesn't break any bots (and I implemented the platform-specific
C include paths for them).
With this patch we can now:
* Build a libc++ as a module and import it into the expression parser.
* Read from the module while also referencing declarations from the debug info. E.g. `std::abs(local_variable)`.
What doesn't work (yet):
* Merging debug info and C++ module declarations. E.g. `std::vector<CustomClass>` doesn't work.
* Pretty much anything that involves the ASTImporter and templated code. As the ASTImporter is used for saving the result declaration, this means that we can't
call yet any function that returns a non-trivial type.
* Use libstdc++ for this, as it requires multiple include paths and Clang only emits one include path per module. Also libstdc++ doesn't support Clang modules without patches.
Reviewers: aprantl, jingham, shafik, friss, davide, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: labath, mgorny, abidh, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58125
llvm-svn: 355939
There are set of classes in Target that describe the parameters of a
process - e.g. it's PID, name, user id, and similar. However, since it
is a bare description of a process and contains no actual functionality,
there's nothing specifically that makes this appropriate for being in
Target -- it could just as well be describing a process on the host, or
some hypothetical virtual process that doesn't even exist.
To cement this, I'm moving these classes to Utility. It's possible that
we can find a better place for it in the future, but as it is neither
Host specific nor Target specific, Utility seems like the most appropriate
place for the time being.
After this there is only 2 remaining references to Target from Host,
which I'll address in a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58842
llvm-svn: 355342
Summary:
This creates an abstract base class called "UserIDResolver", which can
be implemented to provide user/group ID resolution capabilities for
various objects. Posix host implement a PosixUserIDResolver, which does
that using posix apis (getpwuid and friends). PlatformGDBRemote
forwards queries over the gdb-remote link, etc. ProcessInstanceInfo
class is refactored to make use of this interface instead of taking a
platform pointer as an argument. The base resolver class already
implements caching and thread-safety, so implementations don't have to
worry about that.
The main motivating factor for this was to remove external dependencies
from the ProcessInstanceInfo class (so it can be put next to
ProcessLaunchInfo and friends), but it has other benefits too:
- ability to test the user name caching code
- ability to test ProcessInstanceInfo dumping code
- consistent interface for user/group resolution between Platform and
Host classes.
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58167
llvm-svn: 355323
Given that we have a target named Symbols, one wonders why a
file named Symbols.cpp is not in this target. To be clear,
the functions exposed from this file are really focused on
*locating* a symbol file on a given host, which is where the
ambiguity comes in. However, it makes more sense conceptually
to be in the Symbols target. While some of the specific places
to search for symbol files might change depending on the Host,
this is not inherently true in the same way that, for example,
"accessing the file system" or "starting threads" is
fundamentally dependent on the Host.
PDBs, for example, recently became a reality on non-Windows platforms,
and it's theoretically possible that DSYMs could become a thing on non
MacOSX platforms (maybe in a remote debugging scenario). Other types of
symbol files, such as DWO, DWP, etc have never been tied to any Host
platform anyway.
After this patch, there is only one remaining dependency from
Host to Target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58730
llvm-svn: 355032
Summary:
Implement a few routines for Windows to support some basic process interaction and file system operations.
Reviewers: zturner, llvm-commits, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: emaste, jdoerfert, Hui, labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56232
llvm-svn: 354010
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
Summary:
The two classes contained a lot of duplicated code, but there wasn't a
good place to factor it to. It couldn't be the base Platform class,
since we also have platforms which are only remote (such as
PlatformGDBRemoteServer), and so it did not make sense for those to have
an m_remote_platform member.
This patch creates a new class, RemoteAwarePlatform, which can serve as
a base class for platforms which can both serve as a host, and forward
actions to a remote system. It is motivated partly by D56232 (which was
about to add a bunch of additional duplicated methods), and partly by my
own need to modify a function which happens to be implemented in both
places identically.
The patch moves the methods which are trivially identical in the two
classes into the common base class, there were one or two more methods
which could probably be merged into one, but this wasn't completely
trivial, so I did not attempt to do that now.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, clayborg, asmith
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, Hui, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58052
llvm-svn: 353812
Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single
heap allocation for the object and control block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990
llvm-svn: 353764
Summary:
These classes describe the details of the process we are about to
launch, and so they are naturally used by the launching code in the Host
module. Previously they were present in Target because that is the most
important (but by far not the only) user of the launching code.
Since the launching code has other customers, must of which do not care
about Targets, it makes sense to move these classes to the Host layer,
next to the launching code.
This move reduces the number of times that Target is included from host
to 8 (it used to be 14).
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham, davide, teemperor
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56602
llvm-svn: 353047
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
The Debuffer object was being used in "GetListenerForProcess" to provide
a default listener object if one was not specified in the launch_info
object.
Since all the callers of this function immediately passed the result to
Target::CreateProcess, it was easy to move this logic there instead.
This brings us one step closer towards being able to move the LaunchInfo
classes to the Host layer (which is there the launching code that
consumes them lives).
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, teemperor
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56174
llvm-svn: 350510
Using compare is verbose, bug prone and potentially inefficient (because
of early termination). Replace relevant call sites with the (in)equality
operator.
llvm-svn: 349972
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
This patch removes the comments following the header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54385
llvm-svn: 346625
This moves construction of data buffers into the FileSystem class. Like
some of the previous refactorings we don't translate the path yet
because the functionality hasn't been landed in LLVM yet.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54272
llvm-svn: 346598
Replace calls to LLVM's is_directory with calls to LLDB's FileSytem
class. For this I introduced a new convenience method that, like the
other methods, takes either a path or filespec. This still uses the LLVM
functions under the hood.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54135
llvm-svn: 346375
This patch removes the logic for resolving paths out of FileSpec and
updates call sites to rely on the FileSystem class instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53915
llvm-svn: 345890
This patch removes the Exists method from FileSpec and updates its uses
with calls to the FileSystem.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53845
llvm-svn: 345854
This patch removes the ResolveExecutableLocation method from FileSpec
and updates its uses with calls to the FileSystem.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53834
llvm-svn: 345853
This patch removes the GetPermissions and GetReadable methods from
FileSpec and updates its uses with calls to the FileSystem.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53831
llvm-svn: 345843
This patch moves the EnumerateDirectory functionality and related enum
and typedef from FileSpec to FileSystem.
This is part of a set of patches that extracts file system related
convenience methods from FileSpec. The long term goal is to remove this
method altogether and use the iterators directly, but for introducing
the VFS into LLDB this change is sufficient.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53785
llvm-svn: 345800
This patch extends the FileSystem class with a bunch of functions that
are currently implemented as methods of the FileSpec class. These
methods will be removed in future commits and replaced by calls to the
file system.
The new functions are operated in terms of the virtual file system which
was recently moved from clang into LLVM so it could be reused in lldb.
Because the VFS is stateful, we turned the FileSystem class into a
singleton.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53532
llvm-svn: 345783
This fixes a bug PlatformDarwin::SDKSupportsModule introduced by
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47889. VersionTuple::tryParse() can deal
with an optional third (micro) component, but the parse will fail when
there are extra characters after the version number (e.g.: trying to
parse the substring "12.0.sdk" out of "iPhoneSimulator12.0.sdk" fails
after that patch). Fixed here by stripping the ".sdk" suffix first.
(Part of) rdar://problem/45041492
Differential Revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D53677
llvm-svn: 345274
which PlatformRemoteDarwinDevice::UpdateSDKDirectoryInfosIfNeeded
which examine for any additional SDK directories when it is
constructing its list.
<rdar://problem/42984340>
<rdar://problem/41351223>
llvm-svn: 344628
LC_BUILD_VERSION load command handling - this
commit is a combination of patches by Adrian
Prantl and myself. llvm::Triple::BridgeOS
isn't defined yet, so all references to that
are currently commented out.
Also update Xcode project file to build the
NativePDB etc plugins.
<rdar://problem/43353615>
llvm-svn: 344209
This is an NFC commit to refactor the "load dependent files" parameter
from a boolean to an enum value. We want to be able to specify a
default, in which case we decide whether or not to load the dependent
files based on whether the target is an executable or not (i.e. a
dylib).
This is a dependency for D51934.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51859
llvm-svn: 342633
Summary:
D48465 is currently blocked by the fact that tab-completing the first expression is deadlocking LLDB.
The reason for this deadlock is that when we push the ProcessIO handler for reading the Objective-C runtime
information from the executable (which is triggered when we parse the an expression for the first time),
the IOHandler can't be pushed as the Editline::Cancel method is deadlocking.
The deadlock in Editline is coming from the m_output_mutex, which is locked before we go into tab completion.
Even without this lock, calling Cancel on Editline will mean that Editline cleans up behind itself and deletes the
current user-input, which is screws up the console when we are tab-completing at the same time.
I think for now the most reasonable way of fixing this is to just not call Cancel on the current IOHandler when we push
the IOHandler for running an internal utility function.
As we can't really write unit tests for IOHandler itself (due to the hard dependency on an initialized Debugger including
all its global state) and Editline completion is currently also not really testable in an automatic fashion, the test for this has
to be that the expression command completion in D48465 doesn't fail when requesting completion the first time.
A more precise test plan for this is:
1. Apply D48465.
2. Start lldb and break in some function.
3. Type `expr foo` and press tab to request completion.
4. Without this patch, we deadlock and LLDB stops responding.
I'll provide an actual unit test for this once I got around and made the IOHandler code testable,
but for now unblocking D48465 is more critical.
Thanks to Jim for helping me debugging this.
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: emaste, clayborg, abidh, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50912
llvm-svn: 340988
These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used
from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves
overall code layering (although it still does not break any particular
dependency completely).
The XCode project will need to be updated after this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740
llvm-svn: 339127
against the OS rather than the environment. Also update other
uses of OS when we meant environment in the android local code.
NFC intended.
llvm-svn: 338460
Summary:
LLDB_PLUGINS doesn't exist as a variable, so this line doesn't add any dependencies and is
just confusing. It seems this slipped in from the gdb-remote CMake I was using as a CMake template.
The gdb-remote CMake itself is using a local LLDB_PLUGINS variable, so that code is fine.
Reviewers: davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49695
llvm-svn: 337741
This provides an efficient (at least on Posix platforms) way to offload to the
target process the search & loading of a library when all we have are the
library name and a set of potential candidate locations.
<rdar://problem/40905971>
llvm-svn: 335912
If we have a function with signature f(addr_t, AddressClass), it is easy to muddle up the order of arguments without any warnings from compiler. 'enum class' prevents passing integer in place of AddressClass and vice versa.
llvm-svn: 335599
passes to the recursive search function so we only recursively
search the kext bundle directory, instead of its parent directory.
<rdar://problem/41227170>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48302
llvm-svn: 335079
Summary:
Instead of a function taking an enum value determining which path to
return, we now have a suite of functions, each returning a single path
kind. This makes it easy to move the python-path function into a
specific plugin in a follow-up commit.
All the users of GetLLDBPath were converted to call specific functions
instead. Most of them were hard-coding the enum value anyway, so this
conversion was simple. The only exception was SBHostOS, which I've
changed to use a switch on the incoming enum value.
Reviewers: clayborg, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48272
llvm-svn: 335052
Jonas Devlieghere