Named return of a variable with aligned attribute would
trip an assert in case alignment was dependent.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105380
This fixes a gap in the `overloadable` attribute support (K&R declared
functions would get mangled symbol names, but that name wouldn't be
represented in the debug info linkage name field for the function) and
in -funique-internal-linkage-names (this came up in review discussion on
D98799) where K&R static declarations would not get the uniqued linkage
names.
%%%
Transfer the predefined macro, __TOS_AIX__, from the AIX XL C/C++ compilers.
__TOS_AIX__ indicates that the target operating system is AIX.
%%%
Reviewed By: cebowleratibm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103587
As v1.0-rc specs say Zvamo is removed from standard extension,
Zvamo has to be specified explicitly.
Reviewed By: evandro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105396
Prior to this patch, we always gave priority to constraints that we
actually know about symbols in question. However, these can get
outdated and we can get better results if we look at all possible
sources of knowledge, including sub-expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105436
This patch implaments the load and reserve and store conditional
builtins for the PowerPC target, in order to have feature parody with
xlC on AIX.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105236
Named return of a variable with aligned attribute would
trip an assert in case alignment was dependent.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105380
This option implies -fdump-record-layouts but dumps record layout information with canonical field types, which can be more useful in certain cases when comparing structure layouts.
Reviewed By: stevewan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105112
Ignore top-level qualifiers in casts, which fixes issues in reinterpret_cast.
This rule comes from [expr.type]/8.2.2 which explains that casting to a
pr-qualified type should actually cast to the unqualified type. In C++
this is only done for types that aren't classes or arrays.
Fixes: PR49221
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102689
Update CMakeLists.txt in the tutorial to reflect the latest changes in
LLVM. The demo project cannot be linked without added libraries.
Reviewed By: xgupta
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105409
Same as other CreateLoad-style APIs, these need an explicit type
argument to support opaque pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105395
Fix offset calculation routines in padding checker to avoid assertion
errors described in bugzilla issue 50426. The fields that are subojbects
of zero size, marked with [[no_unique_address]] or empty bitfields will
be excluded from padding calculation routines.
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104097
Allow a preprocessor observer to be notified of mark pragmas. Although
this does not impact code generation in any way, it is useful for other
clients, such as clangd, to be able to identify any marked regions.
Reviewed By: dgoldman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105368
This means `max_align_t` is 8 bytes which also sets the alignment
malloc. Since this is technically and ABI breaking change we have
limited to just the emscripten OS target. It is also relatively low
import breakage since it will only effect the alignement of struct that
contai `long double`s (extremerly rare I imagine).
Emscripten's malloc implementation already use 8 byte alignement
(dlmalloc uses and alignement of 2*sizeof(void*) == 8 rather than
checking max_align_t) so will not be effected by this change. By
bringing the ABI in line with the current malloc code this will fix
several issue we have seen in the wild.
See: https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/pull/14456
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104808
This adds a very basic test in `cuda_with_openmp.cu` that just checks whether the CUDA & OpenMP integrated headers do compile, when a CUDA file is compiled with OpenMP (CPU) enabled.
Thus this basically adds the missing test for https://reviews.llvm.org/D90415.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105322
Reland of 31859f896.
This change implements new DAG notes GLOBAL_GET/GLOBAL_SET, and
lowering methods for load and stores of reference types from IR
globals. Once the lowering creates the new nodes, tablegen pattern
matches those and converts them to Wasm global.get/set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104797
A user reported an issue to me via email that Clang was accepting some
code that GCC was rejecting. After investigation, it turned out to be a
general problem of us failing to properly reject attributes written in
the type position in C when they don't apply to types. The root cause
was a terminology issue -- we sometimes use "CXX11Attr" to mean [[]] in
C++11 mode and sometimes [[]] in general -- and this came back to bite
us because in this particular case, it really meant [[]] in C++ mode.
I fixed the issue by introducing a new function
AttributeCommonInfo::isStandardAttributeSyntax() to represent [[]] in
either C or C++ mode.
This fix pointed out that we've had the issue in some of our existing
tests, which have all been corrected. This resolves
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50954.
Before this patch, the dependence of CallExpr was only computed in the
constructor, the dependence bits might not reflect truth -- some arguments might
be not set (nullptr) during this time, e.g. CXXDefaultArgExpr will be set via
the setArg method in the later parsing stage, so we need to recompute the
dependence bits.
This extends the effects of [[ http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1825r0.html | P1825 ]] to all C++ standards from C++11 up to C++20.
According to Motion 23 from Cologne 2019, P1825R0 was accepted as a Defect Report, so we retroactively apply this all the way back to C++11.
Note that we also remove implicit moves from C++98 as an extension
altogether, since the expanded first overload resolution from P1825
can cause some meaning changes in C++98.
For example it can change which copy constructor is picked when both const
and non-const ones are available.
This also rips out warn_return_std_move since there are no cases where it would be worthwhile to suggest it.
This also fixes a bug with bailing into the second overload resolution
when encountering a non-rvref qualified conversion operator.
This was unnoticed until now, so two new test cases cover these.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104500
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50727
When processing C# Lambda expression in the indentation can goes a little wrong,
resulting the the closing } being at the wrong indentation level and meaning the remaining part of the file is
incorrectly indented.
This can be a fairly common pattern for when C# wants to peform a UI action from a thread,
and it wants to invoke that action on the main thread
Reviewed By: exv, jbcoe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104388
It seems like ExprEngine::handleLVectorSplat() was used at only 2
places. It might be better to directly inline them for readability.
It seems like these cases were not covered by tests according to my
coverage measurement, so I'm adding tests as well, demonstrating that no
behavior changed.
Besides that, I'm handling CK_MatrixCast similarly to how the rest of
the unhandled casts are evaluated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105125
Reviewed by: NoQ
Previously `LValueToRValueBitCast`s were modeled in the same way how
a regular `BitCast` was. However, this should not produce an l-value.
Modeling bitcasts accurately is tricky, so it's probably better to
model this expression by binding a fresh conjured value.
The following code should not result in a diagnostic:
```lang=C++
__attribute__((always_inline))
static inline constexpr unsigned int_castf32_u32(float __A) {
return __builtin_bit_cast(unsigned int, __A); // no-warning
}
```
Previously, it reported
`Address of stack memory associated with local variable '__A' returned
to caller [core.StackAddressEscape]`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105017
Reviewed by: NoQ, vsavchenko
We should not error out on non-x86 targets if `-fbasic-block-sections=none` is in effect.
Also, filter it out for GPU-side compilations, as we do with other options not
supported on the GPU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105226
This is an ELF specific option which isn't supported for Windows/MinGW
targets, even if the MinGW linker otherwise uses an ld.bfd like linker
interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105148
Relevant discussion can be found at: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-January/148197.html
In the existing design, An SCC that contains a coroutine will go through the folloing passes:
Inliner -> CoroSplitPass (fake) -> FunctionSimplificationPipeline -> Inliner -> CoroSplitPass (real) -> FunctionSimplificationPipeline
The first CoroSplitPass doesn't do anything other than putting the SCC back to the queue so that the entire pipeline can repeat.
As you can see, we run Inliner twice on the SCC consecutively without doing any real split, which is unnecessary and likely unintended.
What we really wanted is this:
Inliner -> FunctionSimplificationPipeline -> CoroSplitPass -> FunctionSimplificationPipeline
(note that we don't really need to run Inliner again on the ramp function after split).
Hence the way we do it here is to move CoroSplitPass to the end of the CGSCC pipeline, make it once for real, insert the newly generated SCCs (the clones) back to the pipeline so that they can be optimized, and also add a function simplification pipeline after CoroSplit to optimize the post-split ramp function.
This approach also conforms to how the new pass manager works instead of relying on an adhoc post split cleanup, making it ready for full switch to new pass manager eventually.
By looking at some of the changes to the tests, we can already observe that this changes allows for more optimizations applied to coroutines.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95807
Alexey Bataev