target hook.
This patch teaches the compiler that:
rX, rY = VMOVRRD dZ
is the same as:
rX = EXTRACT_SUBREG dZ, ssub_0
rY = EXTRACT_SUBREG dZ, ssub_1
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216132
This patch adds a new property: isExtractSubreg and the related target hooks:
TargetIntrInfo::getExtractSubregInputs and
TargetInstrInfo::getExtractSubregLikeInputs to specify that a target specific
instruction is a (kind of) EXTRACT_SUBREG.
The approach is similar to r215394.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216130
Store TargetSelectionDAGInfo as a pointer instead of a reference:
getSelectionDAGInfo() may not be implemented for certain backends
(e.g. it's not currently implemented for R600).
This bug is reported by UBSan.
llvm-svn: 216129
inside classes as static local variables and remove the static
ivars. Subclasses should use the accessor functions."
This change moved global statics to function local statics, but
forgot to make the locals static in the function, breaking all
platforms. Furthermore, MSVC doesn't support thread-safe function
local statics, so any use of a function local static on non
primitive types is undefined behavior on MSVC.
Reverting due to the fact that it's broken on all platforms, but
would like to have a discussion about the thread-safety issue
before it goes back in.
llvm-svn: 216123
This is the one interesting aspect from:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4965
These hooks are useful for flavor specific processing, such as recording that
a DefinedAtom replaced a weak SharedLibraryAtom.
llvm-svn: 216122
Fix for PR20648 - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20648
This patch checks the operands of a vselect to see if all values are constants.
If yes, bail out of any further attempts to create a blend or shuffle because
SelectionDAGLegalize knows how to turn this kind of vselect into a single load.
This already happens for machines without SSE4.1, so the added checks just send
more targets down that path.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4934
llvm-svn: 216121
The goal of the patch is to implement section 3.2.3 of the AMD64 ABI
correctly. The controlling sentence is, "The size of each argument gets
rounded up to eightbytes. Therefore the stack will always be eightbyte
aligned." The equivalent sentence in the i386 ABI page 37 says, "At all
times, the stack pointer should point to a word-aligned area." For both
architectures, the stack pointer is not being rounded up to the nearest
eightbyte or word between the last normal argument and the first
variadic argument.
Patch by Thomas Jablin!
llvm-svn: 216119
Both MachineLoopInfo and MachineDominatorTree may be null in ScheduleDAGMI
constructor call. It is undefined behavior to take references to these values.
This bug is reported by UBSan.
llvm-svn: 216118
Summary: This fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19530.
The problem is that X86ISelLowering erroneously thought the third call
was eligible for tail call elimination.
It would have been if it's return value was actually the one returned
by the calling function, but here that is not the case and
additional values are being returned.
Test Plan: Test case from the original bug report is included.
Reviewers: rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4968
llvm-svn: 216117
In PR20308 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20308 ), the critical-anti-dependency breaker
caused a miscompile because it broke a WAR hazard using a register that it thinks is available
based on info from a kill inst. Until PR18663 is solved, we shouldn't use any def/use info from
a kill because they are really just nops.
This patch adds guard checks for kills around calls to ScanInstruction() where the DefIndices
array is set. For good measure, add an assert in ScanInstruction() so we don't hit this bug again.
The test case is a reduced version of the code from the bug report.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4977
llvm-svn: 216114
the isRegSequence property.
This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the
isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM.
Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able
to optimize the following sequence:
vmov d0, r2, r3
vmov d1, r0, r1
vmov r0, s0
vmov r1, s2
udiv r0, r1, r0
vmov r1, s1
vmov r2, s3
udiv r1, r2, r1
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
into:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole
optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that
replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register
file), copy.
With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations:
1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies:
PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy.
2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies:
PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy.
The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the
operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction
and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s).
Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100.
The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the
TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we
switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register
(virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with
register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo.
Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the
rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1).
Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole
optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting.
This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874
llvm-svn: 216088
I added wrapping to the CFGPrinter a while back so the -view-cfg
output is actually viewable. I've since enountered very long mangled
names with the same problem, so I'm slightly tweaking this code to
work in that case.
llvm-svn: 216087
Change the lit RUN commands for 3 tests to use the following pattern
"FileCheck -input-file ..." instead of "cat ... | FileCheck ..." as
suggested by Justin Bogner.
llvm-svn: 216085
This fixes a bug I introduced in a previous commit (r216033). Sign-/Zero-
extension from i1 cannot be folded into the ADDS/SUBS instructions. Instead both
operands have to be sign-/zero-extended with separate instructions.
Related to <rdar://problem/17913111>.
llvm-svn: 216073
This generates bitcode which is indistinguishable from what was
hand-written for int32 types in v[load|store]_impl.ll.
v4: Use vec2+scalar for vec3 load/stores to prevent corruption (per Tom)
v3: Also remove unused generic/lib/shared/v[load|store]_impl.ll
v2: (Per Matt Arsenault) Fix alignment issues with vector load stores
Signed-off-by: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
CC: Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com>
CC: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 216069
legalization stage. With those two optimizations, fewer signed/zero extension
instructions can be inserted, and then we can expose more opportunities to
Machine CSE pass in back-end.
llvm-svn: 216066
Summary:
Fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20016 reproducible on new
lea-5.ll case.
Also use RSP/RBP for x32 lea to save 1 byte used for 0x67 prefix in
ESP/EBP case.
Test Plan: lea tests modified to include x32/nacl and new test added
Reviewers: nadav, dschuff, t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits, zinovy.nis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4929
llvm-svn: 216065
LLVM generates illegal `rbit r0, #352` instruction for rbit intrinsic.
According to ARM ARM, rbit only takes register as argument, not immediate.
The correct instruction should be rbit <Rd>, <Rm>.
The bug was originally introduced in r211057.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4980
llvm-svn: 216064
Because declarations of these functions can appear in places like autoconf
checks, they have to be handled somehow, even though we do not support
vararg custom functions. We do so by printing a warning and calling the
uninstrumented function, as we do for unimplemented functions.
llvm-svn: 216042
Quentin Colombet