From the PowerPC ELFv2 ABI section 4.2.3. Global Offset Table.
```
The GOT consists of an 8-byte header that contains the TOC base (the first TOC
base when multiple TOCs are present), followed by an array of 8-byte addresses.
```
Due to the introduction of PC Relative code it is now possible to require a GOT
without having a .TOC. symbol in the object that is being linked. Since LLD uses
the .TOC. symbol to determine whether or not a GOT is required the GOT header is
not setup correctly and the 8-byte header is missing.
This patch allows the Power PC GOT setup to happen when an element is added to
the GOT instead of at the very begining. When this header is added a .TOC.
symbol is also added.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91426
Implemented the option to omit Power10 instructions from save stubs via the
option --no-power10-stubs or --power10-stubs=no on lld. --power10-stubs= will
override the other option. --power10-stubs=auto also exists to use the default
behaviour (ie allow Power10 instructions in stubs).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94627
As we don't sort local symbols, don't sort non-local symbols. This makes
non-local symbols appear in their register order, which matches GNU as. The
register order is nice in that you can write tests with interleaved CHECK
prefixes, e.g.
```
// CHECK: something about foo
.globl foo
foo:
// CHECK: something about bar
.globl bar
bar:
```
With the lexicographical order, the user needs to place lexicographical smallest
symbol first or keep CHECK prefixes in one place.
Add Thread Local Storage support for the 34 bit relocation R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 used in General Dynamic.
The compiler will produce code that looks like:
```
pla r3, x@got@tlsgd@pcrel R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34
bl __tls_get_addr@notoc(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC
```
LLD should be able to correctly compute the relocation for R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 as well as do the following two relaxations where possible:
General Dynamic to Local Exec:
```
paddi r3, r13, x@tprel
nop
```
and General Dynamic to Initial Exec:
```
pld r3, x@got@tprel@pcrel
add r3, r3, r13
```
Note:
This patch adds support for the PC Relative (no TOC) version of General Dynamic on top of the existing support for the TOC version of General Dynamic.
The ABI does not provide any way to tell by looking only at the relocation `R_PPC64_TLSGD` when it is being used in a TOC instruction sequence or and when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. The TOC sequence should always be 4 byte aligned. This patch adds one to the offset of the relocation when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. In this way LLD can tell by looking at the alignment of the offset of `R_PPC64_TLSGD` whether or not it is being used as part of a TOC or no TOC sequence.
Reviewed By: NeHuang, sfertile, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87318
Add Thread Local Storage support for the 34 bit relocation R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 used in General Dynamic.
The compiler will produce code that looks like:
```
pla r3, x@got@tlsgd@pcrel R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34
bl __tls_get_addr@notoc(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC
```
LLD should be able to correctly compute the relocation for R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 as well as do the following two relaxations where possible:
General Dynamic to Local Exec:
```
paddi r3, r13, x@tprel
nop
```
and General Dynamic to Initial Exec:
```
pld r3, x@got@tprel@pcrel
add r3, r3, r13
```
Note:
This patch adds support for the PC Relative (no TOC) version of General Dynamic on top of the existing support for the TOC version of General Dynamic.
The ABI does not provide any way to tell by looking only at the relocation `R_PPC64_TLSGD` when it is being used in a TOC instruction sequence or and when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. The TOC sequence should always be 4 byte aligned. This patch adds one to the offset of the relocation when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. In this way LLD can tell by looking at the alignment of the offset of `R_PPC64_TLSGD` whether or not it is being used as part of a TOC or no TOC sequence.
Reviewed By: NeHuang, sfertile, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87318
Stefan Pintilie