GNU ld has a counterintuitive lang_propagate_lma_regions rule.
```
// .foo's LMA region is propagated to .bar because their VMA region is the same,
// and .bar does not have an explicit output section address (addr_tree).
.foo : { *(.foo) } >RAM AT> FLASH
.bar : { *(.bar) } >RAM
// An explicit output section address disables propagation.
.foo : { *(.foo) } >RAM AT> FLASH
.bar . : { *(.bar) } >RAM
```
In both cases, lld thinks .foo's LMA region is propagated and
places .bar in the same PT_LOAD, so lld diverges from GNU ld w.r.t. the
second case (lma-align.test).
This patch changes Writer<ELFT>::createPhdrs to disable propagation
(start a new PT_LOAD). A user of the first case can make linker scripts
portable by explicitly specifying `AT>`. By contrast, there was no
workaround for the old behavior.
This change uncovers another LMA related bug in assignOffsets() where
`ctx->lmaOffset = 0;` was omitted. It caused a spurious "load address
range overlaps" error for at2.test
The new PT_LOAD rule is complex. For convenience, I listed the origins of some subexpressions:
* rL323449: `sec->memRegion == load->firstSec->memRegion`; linkerscript/at3.test
* D43284: `load->lastSec == Out::programHeaders` (don't start a new PT_LOAD after program headers); linkerscript/at4.test
* D58892: `sec != relroEnd` (start a new PT_LOAD after PT_GNU_RELRO)
Reviewed By: psmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74297
Patch by Konstantin Schwarz!
If more than a single output section is added to a PT_LOAD header,
only the first section should set the LMAOffset of the segment.
Otherwise, we get a load-address overlap error
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50133
llvm-svn: 338697
Patch by Konstantin Schwarz!
If both the MemRegion and LMARegion are set for an output section in
a linker script, we should only increase the LMARegion if it is
different from the MemRegion. Otherwise, we reserve the memory twice.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50065
llvm-svn: 338684
Patch by Konstantin Schwarz!
The condition to create a new phdr must also check the usage of "AT>"
linker script command, and create a new PT_LOAD header if a new LMARegion is used.
This fixes PR38307
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50052
llvm-svn: 338679
Currently, LLD prints VA, but not LMA in a map file.
It seems can be useful to print both to reveal layout
details and patch implements it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44899
llvm-svn: 329271
This is part of PR36515.
With some linkerscripts it is possible to get file offset overlaps
and overflows. Currently LLD checks overlaps in checkNoOverlappingSections().
And also we allow broken output with --no-inhibit-exec.
Problem is that sometimes final offset of sections is completely broken
and we calculate output file size wrong and might crash.
Patch implements check to verify that there is no output section
which offset exceeds file size.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43819
llvm-svn: 327376
This implements INSERT AFTER in a following way:
During reading scripts it collects all insert statements.
After we done and read all files it inserts statements into script commands list.
With that:
* Rest of code does know nothing about INSERT.
* Approach is straightforward and have no visible limitations.
* It is also easy to support INSERT BEFORE (was seen in clang code once).
* Should work for PR35877 and similar cases.
Cons:
* It assumes we have "main" scripts that describes sections.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43468
llvm-svn: 327003
Summary:
This change removes large "echo" commands from the test by writing
tests themselves as linker scripts.
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: emaste, javed.absar, llvm-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43900
llvm-svn: 326403
It should be possible to resolve undefined symbols in dynamic libraries
using symbols defined in a linker script.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43011
llvm-svn: 326176
This removes script input file and inlines script into
testcase body. That is consistent with othet LS tests
and makes testcase easier to read.
llvm-svn: 325673
We had no tests for what PROVIDE should do if there is a shared symbol
with the same name.
In both bfd and our existing implementation PROVIDE wins. Add a test
for that.
llvm-svn: 319486
When a linker script has "foo = bar" and bar is the result of a copy
relocation foo should point to the same location in .bss.
This is part of a growing evidence that copy relocations should be
implemented by using replaceSymbol to replace the SharedSymbol with a
Defined.
llvm-svn: 319449
to separate commons based on file name patterns. The following linker script
construct does not work because commons are allocated before section placement
is done and the only synthesized BssSection that holds all commons has no file
associated with it:
SECTIONS { .common_0 : { *file0.o(COMMON) }}
This patch changes the allocation of commons to create a section per common
symbol and let the section logic do the layout.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37489
llvm-svn: 312796
Also add the test cases for the addition and subtraction both for
the relative and absolute case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35346
llvm-svn: 308692
Previously it was impossible to use linkerscript with --compress-debug-sections
because of assert failture:
Assertion failed: isFinalized(), file C:\llvm\lib\MC\StringTableBuilder.cpp, line 64
Patch fixes the issue
llvm-svn: 302413
This change exposes the symbol table insert method and uses it to
insert the linkerscript defined symbols directly into the symbol
table to avoid unnecessarily pulling the object out of an archive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30224
llvm-svn: 295780
Propagate program headers by walking the commands, not the
sections. This allows us to propagate program headers even from
sections that don't end up in the output.
Fixes pr30997.
llvm-svn: 286837
Our implementation supported integer value previously.
ld can use expression,
for example, it is OK to write
. = SEGMENT_START("foobar", .);
Patch implements that.
llvm-svn: 281831
With fix for 2 bots. Details about the fix performed is on a review page.
Initial commit message:
This is PR30387:
From PR description:
We fail to parse
SECTIONS
{
foo :
{
*(sec0 EXCLUDE_FILE (zed1.o) sec1 EXCLUDE_FILE (zed2.o) sec2 )
}
}
The semantics according to bfd are:
Include sec1 from every file but zed1.o
Include sec2 from every file but zed2.o
Include sec0 from every file
Patch implements the support.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24650
llvm-svn: 281754
This is PR30387:
From PR description:
We fail to parse
SECTIONS
{
foo :
{
*(sec0 EXCLUDE_FILE (zed1.o) sec1 EXCLUDE_FILE (zed2.o) sec2 )
}
}
The semantics according to bfd are:
Include sec1 from every file but zed1.o
Include sec2 from every file but zed2.o
Include sec0 from every file
Patch implements the support.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24650
llvm-svn: 281721
This is fix for PR28976.
Problem was that in scanRelocs, we computed relocation offset too early
for case when linkerscript was used. Patch fixes the issue
delaying the calculation.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23655
llvm-svn: 279264
Previously we supported only sorting by name.
When there are nested section sorting commands in linker script, there can be at most 1
level of nesting for section sorting commands.
SORT_BY_NAME (SORT_BY_ALIGNMENT (wildcard section pattern)). It will sort the input
sections by name first, then by alignment if 2 sections have the same name.
SORT_BY_ALIGNMENT (SORT_BY_NAME (wildcard section pattern)). It will sort the input
sections by alignment first, then by name if 2 sections have the same alignment.
SORT_BY_NAME (SORT_BY_NAME (wildcard section pattern)) is treated the same as SORT_
BY_NAME (wildcard section pattern).
SORT_BY_ALIGNMENT (SORT_BY_ALIGNMENT (wildcard section pattern)) is treated the
same as SORT_BY_ALIGNMENT (wildcard section pattern).
All other nested section sorting commands are invalid.
Patch implements that all above.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23019
llvm-svn: 277583
This is a bit of an odd feature. It is normally used in
. = SEGMENT_START(seg, val);
In bfd it evaluates to val or to the value of the corresponding
-T<seg>-segment. Note that the -T<seg>-segment in bfd doesn't actually
change the segment address, just the value this evaluates too,
including in the default linker script.
In gold the -T<seg>-segment options do change the segment address and
seeing this expressions in linker scripts disables the options.
For new this just always evaluates the expression to val.
llvm-svn: 277014
In compare with what GNU linkers do (https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/Builtin-Functions.html),
this implementation simple:
Do not touch DATA_SEGMENT_ALIGN, it do what it do now - just aligns to the page boundary.
Parameters of DATA_SEGMENT_RELRO_END is ignored. That should be correct as it is usually just a 24 bytes
shift that allows to protect first 3 entries of got.plt with relro.
(https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/conf/ldscript.amd64?revision=284870&view=markup#l146).
DATA_SEGMENT_RELRO_END just aligns to the page boundary.
That is what expected because all sections that are not affected by relro should be on another memory page.
So at fact the difference with documented behavior is that we do not pad DATA_SEGMENT_ALIGN.
3 entries of got.plt are uncovered by relro, but functionality is simple and equal to lld behavior
for case when script is not given.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22813
llvm-svn: 276778
Hafiz Abid Qadeer