There is no need for other passes to access the code-generator command-line
option. Hence, drop it from the header to simplify the interface.
llvm-svn: 235866
This option is enabled since a long time and there does not seem to be a
situation in which we would not want to print alias scopes. Remove this option
to reduce the set of command-line option combinations that may expose bugs.
llvm-svn: 235861
We moved this implementation into the header file to share it between
the CLooG and isl code generator. As the CLooG code generator was dropped,
the implementation can be folded back into the .cpp file.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 235860
In Polly we used both the term 'scattering' and the term 'schedule' to describe
the execution order of a statement without actually distinguishing between them.
We now uniformly use the term 'schedule' for the execution order. This
corresponds to the terminology of isl.
History: CLooG introduced the term scattering as the generated code can be used
as a sequential execution order (schedule) or as a parallel dimension
enumerating different threads of execution (placement). In Polly and/or isl the
term placement was never used, but we uniformly refer to an execution order as a
schedule and only later introduce parallelism. When doing so we do not talk
about about specific placement dimensions.
llvm-svn: 235380
This will allow the ScopInfo to build the polyhedral representation for
non-affine regions that contain loops. Such loops are basically not visible
in the SCoP representation. Accesses that are variant in such loops are
therefor represented as non-affine accesses.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8153
llvm-svn: 234713
This will allow the ScopDetection to detect non-affine regions that
contain loops. All loops contained will be collected and are
accessible to later passes in order to adjust the access functions.
As the loops are non-affine and will not be part of the polyhedral
representation later, all accesses that are variant in these loops
have to be over approximated as non-affine accesses. They are
therefore handled the same way as other non-affine accesses.
Additionally, we do not count non-affine loops for the profitability
heuristic, thus a region with only a non-affine loop will only be
detected if the general detection of loop free regions is enabled.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8152
llvm-svn: 234711
We do not have buildbots or anything that tests this functionality, hence it
most likely bitrots. People interested to use this functionality can always
recover it from svn history.
llvm-svn: 233570
This allows us to delinerize code such as:
A[][n]
for (i
for (j
A[i][n-j-1] = ...
which would previously have been delinearize to an access A[i+1][-j-1].
To recover the correct access we apply the piecewise expression:
{ A[i][j] -> A[i-1][i+N]: i < 0; A[i][j] -> A[i][i]: i >= 0}
This approach generalizes to higher dimensions.
llvm-svn: 233566
This will strip the constant factor of a parameter befor we add it to
the SCoP. As a result the access functions are simplified, e.g., for
the attached test case.
llvm-svn: 233501
This options was earlier used for experiments with the vectorizer, but to my
knowledge is not really used anymore. If anybody needs this, we can always
reintroduce this feature.
llvm-svn: 232934
The BB vectorizer is deprecated and there is no point in generating code for it
any more. This option was introduced when there was not yet any loop vectorizer
in sight. Now being matured, Polly should target the loop vectorizer.
llvm-svn: 232099
The new Dependences struct in the DependenceInfo holds all information
that was formerly part of the DependenceInfo. It also provides the
same interface for the user to access this information.
This is another step to a more general ScopPass interface that does
allow multiple SCoPs to be "in flight".
llvm-svn: 231327
We rename the Dependences pass to DependenceInfo as a first step to a
caching pass policy. The new DependenceInfo pass will later provide
"Dependences" for a SCoP.
To keep consistency the test folder is renamed too.
llvm-svn: 231308
No test cases unfortunately as we do not yet generate isl_ast_op_and_then or
isl_ast_op_or_else. Those will be added in a later commit.
llvm-svn: 231268
If a scalar was defined and used only in a non-affine subregion we do
not need to model the accesses. However, if the scalar was defined
inside the region and escapes the region we have to model the access.
The same is true if the scalar was defined outside and used inside the
region.
llvm-svn: 230960
When we generate code for a whole region we have to respect dominance
and update it too.
The first is achieved with multiple "BBMap"s. Each copied block in the
region gets its own map. It is initialized only with values mapped in
the immediate dominator block, if this block is in the region and was
therefor already copied. This way no values defined in a block that
doesn't dominate the current one will be used.
To update dominance information we check if the immediate dominator of
the original block we want to copy is in the region. If so we set the
immediate dominator of the current block to the copy of the immediate
dominator of the original block.
llvm-svn: 230774
This is the code generation for region statements that are created
when non-affine control flow was present in the input. A new
generator, similar to the block or vector generator, for regions is
used to traverse and copy the region statement and to adjust the
control flow inside the new region in the end.
llvm-svn: 230340
This allows us to model non-affine regions in the SCoP representation.
SCoP statements can now describe either basic blocks or non-affine
regions. In the latter case all accesses in the region are accumulated
for the statement and write accesses, except in the entry, have to be
marked as may-write.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7846
llvm-svn: 230329
With this patch we allow the SCoP detection to detect regions as SCoPs
which have non-affine control flow inside. All non-affine regions are
tracked and later accessible to the ScopInfo.
As there is no real difference, non-affine branches as well as
floating point branches are covered (and both called non-affine
control flow). However, the detection is restricted to
overapproximate only loop free regions.
llvm-svn: 230325
Scops that only read seem generally uninteresting and scops that only write are
most likely initializations where there is also little to optimize. To not
waste compile time we bail early.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7735
llvm-svn: 229820
namespace and header rather than the top-level header and using
declarations. These helpers impede modular builds and are going away.
Migrating away from them will also be necessary to start mixing in any
usage of the new pass manager.
llvm-svn: 229091
This allows us to skip ast and code generation if we did not optimize
a SCoP and will not generate parallel or alias annotations. The
initial heuristic to exit is simple but allows improvements later on.
All failing test cases have been modified to disable early exit, thus
to keep their coverage.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7254
llvm-svn: 228851
This change has two main purposes:
1) We do not use a static interface to hide an object we create and
destroy for every basic block we copy.
2) We allow the BlockGenerator to store information between calls to
the copyBB method. This will ease scalar/phi code generation
later on.
While a lot of method signatures were changed this should not cause
any real behaviour change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7467
llvm-svn: 228443
This allows us to model PHI nodes in the polyhedral description
without demoting them. The modeling however will result in the
same accesses as the demotion would have introduced.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7415
llvm-svn: 228433
Tobias Grosser