bitfield related issues.
The original commit broke Takumi's builder. The bug was caused by bitfield sizes
being determined by their underlying type, rather than the field info. A similar
issue with bitfield alignments showed up on closer testing. Both have been fixed
in this patch.
llvm-svn: 175389
An ivar ofset cannot be marked as invariant load in all cases. The ivar offset
is a lazily initialised constant, which is dependent on an objc_msgSend
invocation to perform a fixup of the offset. If the load is being performed on
a method implemented by the class then this load can safely be marked as an
inviarant because a message must have been passed to the class at some point,
forcing the ivar offset to be resolved.
An additional heuristic that can be used to identify an invariant load would be
if the ivar offset base is a parameter to an objc method. However, without the
parameters available at hand, this is currently not possible.
Reviewed-by: John McCall <rjmccall@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@compnerd.org>
llvm-svn: 175386
Neither of the current clients of CFGRecStmtDeclVisitor are doing
anything with typedefs, so I assume type aliases (C++11 "using")
can be safely ignored. This was causing assertion failures in
the analyzer.
<rdar://problem/13228440>
llvm-svn: 175335
linkonce_odr. Emit construction vtables as internal in this case, since the ABI
does not guarantee that they will be availble externally.
llvm-svn: 175330
until recursive loading is finished.
Otherwise we may end up with a template trying to deserialize a template
parameter that is in the process of getting loaded.
rdar://13135282
llvm-svn: 175329
for distinguishing type vs. value visibility.
The changes to the visibility of explicit specializations
are intentional. The change to the "ugly" test case is
a consequence of a sensible implementation, and I am happy
to argue that this is better behavior. Other changes may
or may not be intended; it is quite difficult to divine
intent from some of the code I altered.
I've left behind a comment which I hope explains the
philosophy behind visibility computation.
llvm-svn: 175326
The current heuristic assumes that there can't be binary operators in
builder-type calls (excluding assigments). However, it also excluded
< and > in general, which is wrong. Now they are only excluded if they
are template parameters.
Before:
return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa->aaaaa().aaaaaaaaaaaaa()i
.aaaaaa() < aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa->aaaaa().aaaaaaaaaaaaa().aaaaaa();
After:
return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa->aaaaa().aaaaaaaaaaaaa().aaaaaa() <
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa->aaaaa().aaaaaaaaaaaaa().aaaaaa();
llvm-svn: 175291
This got lost and was untested as the same effect is achieved by
avoiding bin packing, which is active in Google style by default.
However, moving forward, we want more control over the bin packing
option(s) and thus, this flag should work as expected.
llvm-svn: 175277
This is almost always more readable.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
? aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa : aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
? aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
llvm-svn: 175262
This just adds a very simple check that if a DerivedToBase CastExpr is
operating on a value with known C++ object type, and that type is not the
base type specified in the AST, then the cast is invalid and we should
return UnknownVal.
In the future, perhaps we can have a checker that specifies that this is
illegal, but we still shouldn't assert even if the user turns that checker
off.
PR14872
llvm-svn: 175239
...after a host of optimizations related to the use of LazyCompoundVals
(our implementation of aggregate binds).
Originally applied in r173951.
Reverted in r174069 because it was causing hangs.
Re-applied in r174212.
Reverted in r174265 because it was /still/ causing hangs.
If this needs to be reverted again it will be punted to far in the future.
llvm-svn: 175234
Previously, we were scanning the current store. Now, we properly scan the
store that the LazyCompoundVal came from, which may have very different
live symbols.
llvm-svn: 175232
Previously, whenever we had a LazyCompoundVal, we crawled through the
entire store snapshot looking for bindings within the LCV's region. Now, we
just ask for the subregion bindings of the lazy region and only visit those.
This is an optimization (so no test case), but it may allow us to clean up
more dead bindings than we were previously.
llvm-svn: 175230
This is going to be used in the next commit.
While I'm here, tighten up assumptions about symbolic offset
BindingKeys, and make offset calculation explicitly handle all
MemRegion kinds.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 175228
In C++, constants captured by lambdas (and blocks) are not actually stored
in the closure object, since they can be expanded at compile time. In this
case, they will have no binding when we go to look them up. Previously,
RegionStore thought they were uninitialized stack variables; now, it checks
to see if they are a constant we know how to evaluate, using the same logic
as r175026.
This particular code path is only for scalar variables. Constant arrays and
structs are still unfortunately unhandled; we'll need a stronger solution
for those.
This may have a small performance impact, but only for truly-undefined
local variables, captures in a non-inlined block, and non-constant globals.
Even then, in the non-constant case we're only doing a quick type check.
<rdar://problem/13105553>
llvm-svn: 175194
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa()
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa());
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa().aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa());
Not sure which of the formattings above is better, but we should not pick
one by accident.
llvm-svn: 175165
This gives a clearer separation of the context, e.g. in GMOCK
statements.
Before:
EXPECT_CALL(SomeObject,
SomeFunction(Parameter)).WillRepeatedly(Return(SomeValue));
After:
EXPECT_CALL(SomeObject, SomeFunction(Parameter))
.WillRepeatedly(Return(SomeValue));
Minor format cleanups.
llvm-svn: 175162
Lang Hames