Summary: In case all predecessor go to a single successor of current BB. We want to fold (not thread).
Reviewers: efriedma, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: dberlin, majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30869
llvm-svn: 300657
Summary:
JumpThreading shouldn't duplicate a convergent call, because that would move a convergent call into a control-inequivalent location. For example,
if (cond) {
...
} else {
...
}
convergent_call();
if (cond) {
...
} else {
...
}
should not be optimized to
if (cond) {
...
convergent_call();
...
} else {
...
convergent_call();
...
}
Test Plan: test/Transforms/JumpThreading/basic.ll
Patch by Xuetian Weng.
Reviewers: resistor, arsenm, jingyue
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12484
llvm-svn: 246415
This update was done with the following bash script:
find test/Transforms -name "*.ll" | \
while read NAME; do
echo "$NAME"
if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc" $NAME; then
TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
cp $NAME $TEMP
sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
while read FUNC; do
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\):\( *\)@$FUNC\([( ]*\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP
done
mv $TEMP $NAME
fi
done
llvm-svn: 186268
Listing all of the attributes for the callee of a call/invoke instruction is way
too much and makes the IR unreadable. Use references to attributes instead.
llvm-svn: 175877
Similarly inlining of the function is inhibited, if that would duplicate the call (in particular inlining is still allowed when there is only one callsite and the function has internal linkage).
llvm-svn: 170704
I have not been able to find a way to test each in isolation, for a few reasons:
1) The ability to look-through non-i1 BinaryOperator's requires the ability to look through non-constant
ICmps in order for it to ever trigger.
2) The ability to do LVI-powered PHI value determination only matters in cases that ProcessBranchOnPHI
can't handle. Since it already handles all the cases without other instructions in the def-use chain
between the PHI and the branch, it requires the ability to look through ICmps and/or BinaryOperators
as well.
llvm-svn: 112611
in JT.
2) When cloning blocks for PHI or xor conditions, use
instsimplify to simplify the code as we go. This allows us to
squish common cases early in JT which opens up opportunities for
subsequent iterations, and allows it to completely simplify the
testcase.
llvm-svn: 93253
condition is a xor with a phi node. This eliminates nonsense
like this from 176.gcc in several places:
LBB166_84:
testl %eax, %eax
- setne %al
- xorb %cl, %al
- notb %al
- testb $1, %al
- je LBB166_85
+ je LBB166_69
+ jmp LBB166_85
This is rdar://7391699
llvm-svn: 93221
debug intrinsics, and an unconditional branch when possible. This
reuses the TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock function split
out of simplifycfg.
llvm-svn: 86722
just one level deep. On the testcase we go from getting this:
F1: ; preds = %T2
%F = and i1 true, %cond ; <i1> [#uses=1]
br i1 %F, label %X, label %Y
to a fully threaded:
F1: ; preds = %T2
br label %Y
This changes gets us to the point where we're forming (too many) switch
instructions on doug's strswitch testcase.
llvm-svn: 86646
predicates. This allows us to jump thread things like:
_ZN12StringSwitchI5ColorE4CaseILj7EEERS1_RAT__KcRKS0_.exit119:
%tmp1.i24166 = phi i8 [ 1, %bb5.i117 ], [ %tmp1.i24165, %_Z....exit ], [ %tmp1.i24165, %bb4.i114 ]
%toBoolnot.i87 = icmp eq i8 %tmp1.i24166, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
%tmp4.i90 = icmp eq i32 %tmp2.i, 6 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
%or.cond173 = and i1 %toBoolnot.i87, %tmp4.i90 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
br i1 %or.cond173, label %bb4.i96, label %_ZN12...
Where it is "obvious" that when coming from %bb5.i117 that the 'and' is always
false. This triggers a surprisingly high number of times in the testsuite,
and gets us closer to generating good code for doug's strswitch testcase.
This also make a bunch of other code in jump threading redundant, I'll rip
out in the next patch. This survived an enable-checking llvm-gcc bootstrap.
llvm-svn: 86264
done by condprop, but do it in a much more general form. The
basic idea is that we can do a limited form of tail duplication
in the case when we have a branch on a phi. Moving the branch
up in to the predecessor block makes instruction selection
much easier and encourages chained jump threadings.
llvm-svn: 83759
input filename so that opt doesn't print the input filename in the
output so that grep lines in the tests don't unintentionally match
strings in the input filename.
llvm-svn: 81537
1) have it fold "br undef", which does occur with
surprising frequency as jump threading iterates.
2) teach j-t to delete dead blocks. This removes the successor
edges, reducing the in-edges of other blocks, allowing
recursive simplification.
3) Fold things like:
br COND, BBX, BBY
BBX:
br COND, BBZ, BBW
which also happens because jump threading iterates.
llvm-svn: 60470
Chandler Carruth