Previously, we would clone the current diagnostic consumer to produce
a new diagnostic consumer to use when building a module. The problem
here is that we end up losing diagnostics for important diagnostic
consumers, such as serialized diagnostics (where we'd end up with two
diagnostic consumers writing the same output file). With forwarding,
the diagnostics from all of the different modules being built get
forwarded to the one serialized-diagnostic consumer and are emitted in
a sane way.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13663996>.
llvm-svn: 181067
VerifyDiagnosticConsumer previously would not check that the diagnostic and
its matching directive referenced the same source file. Common practice was
to create directives that referenced other files but only by line number,
and this led to problems such as when the file containing the directive
didn't have enough lines to match the location of the diagnostic in the
other file, leading to bizarre file formatting and other oddities.
This patch causes VerifyDiagnosticConsumer to match source files as well as
line numbers. Therefore, a new syntax is made available for directives, for
example:
// expected-error@file:line {{diagnostic message}}
This extends the @line feature where "file" is the file where the diagnostic
is generated. The @line syntax is still available and uses the current file
for the diagnostic. "file" can be specified either as a relative or absolute
path - although the latter has less usefulness, I think! The #include search
paths will be used to locate the file and if it is not found an error will be
generated.
The new check is not optional: if the directive is in a different file to the
diagnostic, the file must be specified. Therefore, a number of test-cases
have been updated with regard to this.
This closes out PR15613.
llvm-svn: 179677
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
This change was initially proposed as a solution to the problem highlighted by check-in r164677, i.e. that -verify will not cause a test-case failure where the compile command does not actually reference the file.
Patch reviewed by David Blaikie.
llvm-svn: 166281
In Debug builds, VerifyDiagnosticConsumer checks any files with diagnostics
to make sure we got the chance to parse them for directives (expected-warning
and friends). This check previously relied on every parsed file having a
FileEntry, which broke the cling interpreter's test suite.
This commit changes the extra debug checking to mark a file as unparsed
as soon as we see a diagnostic from that file. At the very end, any files
that are still marked as unparsed are checked for directives, and a fatal
error is emitted (as before) if we find out that there were directives we
missed. -verify directives should always live in actual parsed files, not
in PCH or AST files.
Patch by Andy Gibbs, with slight modifications by me.
llvm-svn: 162171
The old behavior was to re-scan any files (like modules) where we may have
directives but won't actually be parsing during the -verify invocation.
Now, we keep the old behavior in Debug builds as a sanity check (though
modules are a known entity), and expect all legitimate directives to come
from comments seen by the preprocessor.
This also affects the ARC migration tool, which captures diagnostics in
order to filter some out. This change adds an explicit cleanup to
CaptureDiagnosticsConsumer in order to let its sub-consumer handle the
real end of diagnostics.
This was originally split into four patches, but the tests do not run
cleanly without all four, so I've combined them into one commit.
Patches by Andy Gibbs, with slight modifications from me.
llvm-svn: 161650
This is accomplished by making VerifyDiagnosticsConsumer a CommentHandler,
which then only reads the -verify directives that are actually in live
blocks of code. It also makes it simpler to handle -verify directives that
appear in header files, though we still have to manually reparse some files
depending on how they are generated.
This requires some test changes. In particular, all PCH tests now have their
-verify directives outside the "header" portion of the file, using the @line
syntax added in r159978. Other tests have been modified mostly to make it
clear what is being tested, and to prevent polluting the expected output with
the directives themselves.
Patch by Andy Gibbs! (with slight modifications)
The new Frontend/verify-* tests exercise the functionality of this commit,
as well as r159978, r159979, and r160053 (Andy's other -verify enhancements).
llvm-svn: 160068
Previously we'd halt at the fatal error as expected, but not actually emit
any -verify-related diagnostics. This lets us catch cases that emit a
/different/ fatal error from the one we expected.
This is implemented by adding a "force emit" mode to DiagnosticBuilder, which
will cause diagnostics to immediately be emitted regardless of current
suppression. Needless to say this should probably be used /very/ sparingly.
Patch by Andy Gibbs! Tests for all of Andy's -verify patches coming soon.
llvm-svn: 160053
void f(); // expected-note 0+ {{previous declaration is here}}
void g(); // expected-note 0-1 {{previous declaration is here}}
The old "+" syntax is still an alias for "1+", and single numbers still work.
Patch by Andy Gibbs!
llvm-svn: 159979
// expected-warning@10 {{some text}}
The line number may be absolute (as above), or relative to the current
line by prefixing the number with either '+' or '-'.
Patch by Andy Gibbs!
llvm-svn: 159978
It had been causing test "Misc/diag-verify.cpp" failure on ms cl.exe. The emission was ordered unexpectedly as below;
First) error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
Second) error: 'error' diagnostics expected but not seen:
llvm-svn: 146830
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
we have the ability to create a new, distict diagnostic consumer when
we go off and build a module. This avoids the currently horribleness
where the same diagnostic consumer sees diagnostics for multiple
translation units (and multiple SourceManagers!) causing all sorts of havok.
llvm-svn: 140743
Douglas Gregor