AttributeList::hasAttribute() is confusing, use clearer methods like
hasParamAttr()/hasRetAttr().
Add hasRetAttr() since it was missing from AttributeList.
Main reason is preparation to transform AliasResult to class that contains
offset for PartialAlias case.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98027
Interval value
The II value was incremented before exiting the loop, and therefor when
used in the optimization remarks and debug dumps it did not reflect the
initiation interval actually used in Schedule.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95692
1. Removed #include "...AliasAnalysis.h" in other headers and modules.
2. Cleaned up includes in AliasAnalysis.h.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92489
Currently, we have some confusion in the codebase regarding the
meaning of LocationSize::unknown(): Some parts (including most of
BasicAA) assume that LocationSize::unknown() only allows accesses
after the base pointer. Some parts (various callers of AA) assume
that LocationSize::unknown() allows accesses both before and after
the base pointer (but within the underlying object).
This patch splits up LocationSize::unknown() into
LocationSize::afterPointer() and LocationSize::beforeOrAfterPointer()
to make this completely unambiguous. I tried my best to determine
which one is appropriate for all the existing uses.
The test changes in cs-cs.ll in particular illustrate a previously
clearly incorrect AA result: We were effectively assuming that
argmemonly functions were only allowed to access their arguments
after the passed pointer, but not before it. I'm pretty sure that
this was not intentional, and it's certainly not specified by
LangRef that way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91649
This patch adds ORE for MachinePipeliner, so that people can anaylyze
their code using opt-viewer or other tools, then optimize the code to
catch more piplining opportunities.
Reviewed By: bcahoon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79368
This allows targets to know exactly which operands are contributing to
the dependency, which is required for targets with per-operand
scheduling models.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77135
The current implementation collects all Preds/Succs of a Dep of kind Output, creating a long chain and subsequently a schedule with an unnecessarily large II.
Was this done on purpose for a reason I'm missing?
Reviewed By: bcahoon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75424
Summary:
The type used to represent functional units in MC is
'unsigned', which is 32 bits wide. This is currently
not a problem in any upstream target as no one seems
to have hit the limit on this yet, but in our
downstream one, we need to define more than 32
functional units.
Increasing the size does not seem to cause a huge
size increase in the binary (an llc debug build went
from 1366497672 to 1366523984, a difference of 26k),
so perhaps it would be acceptable to have this patch
applied upstream as well.
Subscribers: hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71210
Summary:
Making `Scale` a `TypeSize` in AArch64InstrInfo::getMemOpInfo,
has the effect that all places where this information is used
(notably, TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset) will need
to consider Scale - and derived, Offset - possibly being scalable.
This patch adds a new operand `bool &OffsetIsScalable` to
TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset and fixes up all
the places where this function is used, to consider the
offset possibly being scalable.
In most cases, this means bailing out because the algorithm does not
(or cannot) support scalable offsets in places where it does some
form of alias checking for example.
Reviewers: rovka, efriedma, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: wuzish, kerbowa, MatzeB, arsenm, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72758
Summary:
This extends the PeelingModuloScheduleExpander to generate prolog and epilog code,
and correctly stitch uses through the prolog, kernel, epilog DAG.
The key concept in this patch is to ensure that all transforms are *local*; only a
function of a block and its immediate predecessor and successor. By defining the problem in this way
we can inductively rewrite the entire DAG using only local knowledge that is easy to
reason about.
For example, we assume that all prologs and epilogs are near-perfect clones of the
steady-state kernel. This means that if a block has an instruction that is predicated out,
we can redirect all users of that instruction to that equivalent instruction in our
immediate predecessor. As all blocks are clones, every instruction must have an equivalent in
every other block.
Similarly we can make the assumption by construction that if a value defined in a block is used
outside that block, the only possible user is its immediate successors. We maintain this
even for values that are used outside the loop by creating a limited form of LCSSA.
This code isn't small, but it isn't complex.
Enabled a bunch of testing from Hexagon. There are a couple of tests not enabled yet;
I'm about 80% sure there isn't buggy codegen but the tests are checking for patterns
that we don't produce. Those still need a bit more investigation. In the meantime we
(Google) are happy with the code produced by this on our downstream SMS implementation,
and believe it generates correct code.
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68205
llvm-svn: 373462
Recommit: fix asan errors.
The way MachinePipeliner uses these target hooks is stateful - we reduce trip
count by one per call to reduceLoopCount. It's a little overfit for hardware
loops, where we don't have to worry about stitching a loop induction variable
across prologs and epilogs (the induction variable is implicit).
This patch introduces a new API:
/// Analyze loop L, which must be a single-basic-block loop, and if the
/// conditions can be understood enough produce a PipelinerLoopInfo object.
virtual std::unique_ptr<PipelinerLoopInfo>
analyzeLoopForPipelining(MachineBasicBlock *LoopBB) const;
The return value is expected to be an implementation of the abstract class:
/// Object returned by analyzeLoopForPipelining. Allows software pipelining
/// implementations to query attributes of the loop being pipelined.
class PipelinerLoopInfo {
public:
virtual ~PipelinerLoopInfo();
/// Return true if the given instruction should not be pipelined and should
/// be ignored. An example could be a loop comparison, or induction variable
/// update with no users being pipelined.
virtual bool shouldIgnoreForPipelining(const MachineInstr *MI) const = 0;
/// Create a condition to determine if the trip count of the loop is greater
/// than TC.
///
/// If the trip count is statically known to be greater than TC, return
/// true. If the trip count is statically known to be not greater than TC,
/// return false. Otherwise return nullopt and fill out Cond with the test
/// condition.
virtual Optional<bool>
createTripCountGreaterCondition(int TC, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
SmallVectorImpl<MachineOperand> &Cond) = 0;
/// Modify the loop such that the trip count is
/// OriginalTC + TripCountAdjust.
virtual void adjustTripCount(int TripCountAdjust) = 0;
/// Called when the loop's preheader has been modified to NewPreheader.
virtual void setPreheader(MachineBasicBlock *NewPreheader) = 0;
/// Called when the loop is being removed.
virtual void disposed() = 0;
};
The Pipeliner (ModuloSchedule.cpp) can use this object to modify the loop while
allowing the target to hold its own state across all calls. This API, in
particular the disjunction of creating a trip count check condition and
adjusting the loop, improves the code quality in ModuloSchedule.cpp.
llvm-svn: 372463
The way MachinePipeliner uses these target hooks is stateful - we reduce trip
count by one per call to reduceLoopCount. It's a little overfit for hardware
loops, where we don't have to worry about stitching a loop induction variable
across prologs and epilogs (the induction variable is implicit).
This patch introduces a new API:
/// Analyze loop L, which must be a single-basic-block loop, and if the
/// conditions can be understood enough produce a PipelinerLoopInfo object.
virtual std::unique_ptr<PipelinerLoopInfo>
analyzeLoopForPipelining(MachineBasicBlock *LoopBB) const;
The return value is expected to be an implementation of the abstract class:
/// Object returned by analyzeLoopForPipelining. Allows software pipelining
/// implementations to query attributes of the loop being pipelined.
class PipelinerLoopInfo {
public:
virtual ~PipelinerLoopInfo();
/// Return true if the given instruction should not be pipelined and should
/// be ignored. An example could be a loop comparison, or induction variable
/// update with no users being pipelined.
virtual bool shouldIgnoreForPipelining(const MachineInstr *MI) const = 0;
/// Create a condition to determine if the trip count of the loop is greater
/// than TC.
///
/// If the trip count is statically known to be greater than TC, return
/// true. If the trip count is statically known to be not greater than TC,
/// return false. Otherwise return nullopt and fill out Cond with the test
/// condition.
virtual Optional<bool>
createTripCountGreaterCondition(int TC, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
SmallVectorImpl<MachineOperand> &Cond) = 0;
/// Modify the loop such that the trip count is
/// OriginalTC + TripCountAdjust.
virtual void adjustTripCount(int TripCountAdjust) = 0;
/// Called when the loop's preheader has been modified to NewPreheader.
virtual void setPreheader(MachineBasicBlock *NewPreheader) = 0;
/// Called when the loop is being removed.
virtual void disposed() = 0;
};
The Pipeliner (ModuloSchedule.cpp) can use this object to modify the loop while
allowing the target to hold its own state across all calls. This API, in
particular the disjunction of creating a trip count check condition and
adjusting the loop, improves the code quality in ModuloSchedule.cpp.
llvm-svn: 372376
This is the beginnings of a reimplementation of ModuloScheduleExpander. It works
by generating a single-block correct pipelined kernel and then peeling out the
prolog and epilogs.
This patch implements kernel generation as well as a validator that will
confirm the number of phis added is the same as the ModuloScheduleExpander.
Prolog and epilog peeling will come in a different patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67081
llvm-svn: 370893
Emitting a schedule is really hard. There are lots of corner cases to take care of; in fact, of the 60+ SWP-specific testcases in the Hexagon backend most of those are testing codegen rather than the schedule creation itself.
One issue is that to test an emission corner case we must craft an input such that the generated schedule uses that corner case; sometimes this is very hard and convolutes testcases. Other times it is impossible but we want to test it anyway.
This patch adds a simple test pass that will consume a module containing a loop and generate pipelined code from it. We use post-instr-symbols as a way to annotate instructions with the stage and cycle that we want to schedule them at.
We also provide a flag that causes the MachinePipeliner to generate these annotations instead of actually emitting code; this allows us to generate an input testcase with:
llc < %s -stop-after=pipeliner -pipeliner-annotate-for-testing -o test.mir
And run the emission in isolation with:
llc < test.mir -run-pass=modulo-schedule-test
llvm-svn: 370705
This is the first stage in refactoring the pipeliner and making it more
accessible for backends to override and control. This separates the logic and
state required to *emit* a scheudule from the logic that *computes* and
validates a schedule.
This will enable (a) new schedule emitters and (b) new modulo scheduling
implementations to coexist.
NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67006
llvm-svn: 370500
Summary:
Found a couple of places in the code where all the PHI nodes
of a MBB is updated, replacing references to one MBB by
reference to another MBB instead.
This patch simply refactors the code to use a common helper
(MachineBasicBlock::replacePhiUsesWith) for such PHI node
updates.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, arsenm, uabelho
Subscribers: wdng, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66750
llvm-svn: 370463
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
Summary:
This is exposed by adding a new testcase in PowerPC in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL367732
The testcase got different output on different platform, hence breaking
buildbots.
The problem is that we get differnt FuncUnitOrder when calculateResMII.
The root cause is:
1. Two MachineInstr might get SAME priority(MFUsx) from minFuncUnits.
2. Current comparison operator() will return `MFUs1 > MFUs2`.
3. We use iterators for MachineInstr, so the input to FuncUnitSorter
might be different on differnt platform due to the iterator nature.
So for two MI with same MFU, their order is actually depends on the
iterator order, which is platform (implemtation) dependent.
This is risky, and may cause cross-compiling problems.
The fix is to check make sure we assign a determine order when they are
equal.
Reviewers: bcahoon, hfinkel, jmolloy
Subscribers: nemanjai, hiraditya, MaskRay, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65992
llvm-svn: 368441
Summary:
Problem exposed in PowerPC functional testing.
We did not consider Anti dependence for nodes in same cycle,
so we may end up generating bad machine code.
eg: the reduced test won't verify.
*** Bad machine code: Using an undefined physical register ***
- function: lame_encode_buffer_interleaved
- basic block: %bb.4 (0x4bde4e12928)
- instruction: %29:gprc = ADDZE %27:gprc, implicit-def dead $carry, implicit $carry
- operand 3: implicit $carry
Reviewers: bcahoon, kparzysz, hfinkel
Subscribers: MaskRay, wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64192
llvm-svn: 365859
Summary:
This is exposed by functional testing on PowerPC.
In some pipelined loops, Phi refer to phi did not get value defined by
the Phi, hence getting wrong value later.
As the comment mentioned, we should "use the value defined by the Phi,
unless we're generating the firstepilog and the Phi refers to a Phi
in a different stage.", so Phi refering to same stage Phi should use
the value defined by the Phi here.
Reviewers: bcahoon, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: MaskRay, wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64035
llvm-svn: 365428
When we calculate MII, we use two loops, one with iterator R++ to
check whether we can reserve the resource, then --R to move back
the iterator to do reservation.
This is risky, as R++, --R may not point to the same element at all.
The can cause wrong MII.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63536
llvm-svn: 364353
This was exposed by PowerPC target enablement.
In ScheduleDAG, if we haven't seen any uses in this scheduling region,
we will create a dependence edge to ExitSU to model the live-out latency.
This is required for vreg defs with no in-region use, and prefetches with
no vreg def.
When we build NodeOrder in Scheduler, we ignore these boundary nodes.
However, when we check Succs in checkValidNodeOrder, we did not skip
them, so we still assume all the nodes have been sorted and in order in
Indices array. So when we call lower_bound() for ExitSU, it will return
Indices.end(), causing memory issues in following Node access.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63282
llvm-svn: 363329
Implement necessary target hooks to enable MachinePipeliner for P9 only.
The pass is off by default, can be enabled with -ppc-enable-pipeliner for P9.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62164
llvm-svn: 363085
The ISD::STRICT_ nodes used to implement the constrained floating-point
intrinsics are currently never passed to the target back-end, which makes
it impossible to handle them correctly (e.g. mark instructions are depending
on a floating-point status and control register, or mark instructions as
possibly trapping).
This patch allows the target to use setOperationAction to switch the action
on ISD::STRICT_ nodes to Legal. If this is done, the SelectionDAG common code
will stop converting the STRICT nodes to regular floating-point nodes, but
instead pass the STRICT nodes to the target using normal SelectionDAG
matching rules.
To avoid having the back-end duplicate all the floating-point instruction
patterns to handle both strict and non-strict variants, we make the MI
codegen explicitly aware of the floating-point exceptions by introducing
two new concepts:
- A new MCID flag "mayRaiseFPException" that the target should set on any
instruction that possibly can raise FP exception according to the
architecture definition.
- A new MI flag FPExcept that CodeGen/SelectionDAG will set on any MI
instruction resulting from expansion of any constrained FP intrinsic.
Any MI instruction that is *both* marked as mayRaiseFPException *and*
FPExcept then needs to be considered as raising exceptions by MI-level
codegen (e.g. scheduling).
Setting those two new flags is straightforward. The mayRaiseFPException
flag is simply set via TableGen by marking all relevant instruction
patterns in the .td files.
The FPExcept flag is set in SDNodeFlags when creating the STRICT_ nodes
in the SelectionDAG, and gets inherited in the MachineSDNode nodes created
from it during instruction selection. The flag is then transfered to an
MIFlag when creating the MI from the MachineSDNode. This is handled just
like fast-math flags like no-nans are handled today.
This patch includes both common code changes required to implement the
new features, and the SystemZ implementation.
Reviewed By: andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55506
llvm-svn: 362663
The current design use DFA to do resource tracking in SMS,
and DFA only support InstrItins, and also has scaling limitation.
This patch extend SMS to allow Subtarget to use ProcResource in
InstrSchedModel instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62163
llvm-svn: 361919
Summary:
Both the input Value pointer and the returned Value
pointers in GetUnderlyingObjects are now declared as
const.
It turned out that all current (in-tree) uses of
GetUnderlyingObjects were trivial to update, being
satisfied with have those Value pointers declared
as const. Actually, in the past several of the users
had to use const_cast, just because of ValueTracking
not providing a version of GetUnderlyingObjects with
"const" Value pointers. With this patch we get rid
of those const casts.
Reviewers: hfinkel, materi, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: dexonsmith, jkorous, jholewinski, sdardis, eraman, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61038
llvm-svn: 359072
Summary:
The basic idea here is to make it possible to use
MachineInstr::mayAlias also when the MachineInstr
is const (or the "Other" MachineInstr is const).
The addition of const in MachineInstr::mayAlias
then rippled down to the need for adding const
in several other places, such as
TargetTransformInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, MatzeB, arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60856
llvm-svn: 358744
The isLoopCarriedDep function does not correctly compute loop
carried dependences when the array index offset is negative
or the stride is smallar than the access size.
Patch by Denis Antrushin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60135
llvm-svn: 358233
Background: At the moment, we record the AtomicOrdering of an access in the MMO, but also mark any atomic access as volatile in SelectionDAG. I'm working towards separating that. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D57601 for context.
Update all usages of isVolatile in lib/CodeGen to preserve behaviour once atomic MMOs stop being also volatile. This is NFC in it's current form, but is essential for correctness once we make that final change.
It useful to keep in mind that AtomicSDNode is not a parent of LoadSDNode, StoreSDNode, or LSBaseSDNode. As a result, any call to isVolatile on one of those static types doesn't need a companion isAtomic check. We should probably adjust that class hierarchy long term, but for now, that seperation is useful.
I'm deliberately being conservative about handling. I want the change to stop adding volatile to be NFC itself, and then will work through places where we can be less conservative for atomics one by one in separate changes w/tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57596
llvm-svn: 352937
Arthur Eubanks