This is a rough reapplication of the change that fixed std::to_address
to avoid relying on element_type (da456167). It is somewhat different
because the fix to avoid breaking Clang (which caused it to be reverted
in 347f69c55) was a bit more involved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101638
This appears to be a bug in our string::assign: when assigning into
a longer string, from a shorter snippet of itself, we invalidate
iterators before doing the copy. We should invalidate them afterward.
Also drive-by improve the formatting of a function header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101675
This allocator is not intended for libc++'s users to use;
it's strictly an implementation detail of `src/locale.cpp`.
So, move it to the `src/include/` directory.
Drive-by const-qualify its comparison operators.
For consistency with `__hidden_allocator` (defined in `src/thread.cpp`),
do *not* remove it from "libcxx/lib/libc++unexp.exp",
"libcxx/utils/symcheck-blacklists/linux_blacklist.txt", etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101293
This reverts commit da456167, which broke the Clang build. I'm able to
reproduce it but I want to give myself a bit more time to investigate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101638
In std::tuple, we should try to avoid calling std::is_copy_constructible
whenever we can to avoid surprising interactions with (I believe) compiler
builtins. This bug was reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523#2730953.
The issue was that when tuple<_Up...> was the same as tuple<_Tp...>, we
would short-circuit the _Or (because sizeof...(_Tp) != 1) and go evaluate
the following `is_constructible<_Tp, const _Up&>...`. That shouldn't
actually be a problem, but see the analysis in https://reviews.llvm.org/D101770#2736470
for why it is with Clang and GCC.
Instead, after this patch, we check whether the constructed-from tuple
is the same as the current tuple regardless of the number of elements,
since we should always prefer the normal copy constructor in that case
anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101770
This fixes the issue by implementing _And using the short-circuiting
SFINAE trick that we previously used only in std::tuple. One thing we
could look into is use the naive recursive implementation for disjunctions
with a small number of arguments, and use that trick with larger numbers
of arguments. It might be the case that the constant overhead for setting
up the SFINAE trick makes it only worth doing for larger packs, but that's
left for further work.
This problem was raised in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101661
This patch gets rid of technical debt around std::pointer_safety which,
I claim, is entirely unnecessary. I don't think anybody has used
std::pointer_safety in actual code because we do not implement the
underlying garbage collection support. In fact, P2186 even proposes
removing these facilities entirely from a future C++ version. As such,
I think it's entirely fine to get rid of complex workarounds whose goals
were to avoid breaking the ABI back in 2017.
I'm putting this up both to get reviews and to discuss this proposal for
a breaking change. I think we should be comfortable with making these
tiny breaks if we are confident they won't hurt anyone, which I'm fairly
confident is the case here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100410
This reverts a224bf8ec4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "#define __in", where __in is one macro in the MSVC Source
Code Annotation Language, defined in sal.h
Just use a different variable name than "__in"
__indirectly_readable_impl, and add "__in" to nasty_macros.h just
like the existing __out. (Also adding a couple more potentially
conflicting ones.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101613
A span has no idea what container (if any) "owns" its iterators, nor
under what circumstances they might become invalidated.
However, continue to use `__wrap_iter<T*>` instead of raw `T*` outside
of debug mode, because we've been shipping `std::span` since Clang 7
and ldionne doesn't want to break ABI. (Namely, the mangling of functions
taking `span::iterator` as a parameter.) Permit using raw `T*` there,
but only under an ABI macro: `_LIBCPP_ABI_SPAN_POINTER_ITERATORS`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101003
* `std::ranges::range`
* `std::ranges::sentinel_t`
* `std::ranges::range_difference_t`
* `std::ranges::range_value_t`
* `std::ranges::range_reference_t`
* `std::ranges::range_rvalue_reference_t`
* `std::ranges::common_range`
`range_size_t` depends on `sized_range` and will be added alongside it.
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100255.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100269
While working on D70631, Microsoft's unit tests discovered an issue.
Our `std::to_chars` implementation for bases != 10 uses the range
`[first,last)` as temporary buffer. This violates the contract for
to_chars:
[charconv.to.chars]/1 http://eel.is/c++draft/charconv#to.chars-1
`to_chars_result to_chars(char* first, char* last, see below value, int base = 10);`
"If the member ec of the return value is such that the value is equal to
the value of a value-initialized errc, the conversion was successful and
the member ptr is the one-past-the-end pointer of the characters
written."
Our implementation modifies the range `[member ptr, last)`, which causes
Microsoft's test to fail. Their test verifies the buffer
`[member ptr, last)` is unchanged. (The test is only done when the
conversion is successful.)
While looking at the code I noticed the performance for bases != 10 also
is suboptimal. This is tracked in D97705.
This patch fixes the issue and adds a benchmark. This benchmark will be
used as baseline for D97705.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, zoecarver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100722
When using the per-target runtime build, it may be desirable to have
different __config_site headers for each target where all targets cannot
share a single configuration.
The layout used for libc++ headers after this change is:
```
include/
c++/
v1/
<libc++ headers except for __config_site>
<target1>/
c++/
v1/
__config_site
<target2>/
c++/
v1/
__config_site
<other targets>
```
This is the most optimal layout since it avoids duplication, the only
headers that's per-target is __config_site, all other headers are
shared across targets. This also means that we no need two
-isystem flags: one for the target-agnostic headers and one for
the target specific headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89013
This reverts a large chunk of http://reviews.llvm.org/D15862 ,
and also fixes bugs in `insert`, `append`, and `assign`, which are now regression-tested.
(Thanks to Tim Song for pointing out the bug in `append`!)
Before this patch, we did a special dance in `append`, `assign`, and `insert`
(but not `replace`). All of these require the strong exception guarantee,
even when the user-provided InputIterator might have throwing operations.
The naive way to accomplish this is to construct a temporary string and
then append/assign/insert from the temporary; i.e., finish all the potentially
throwing and self-inspecting InputIterator operations *before* starting to
modify self. But this is slow, so we'd like to skip it when possible.
The old code (D15682) attempted to check that specific iterator operations
were nothrow: it assumed that if the iterator operations didn't throw, then
it was safe to iterate the input range multiple times and therefore it was
safe to use the fast-path non-naive version. This was wrong for two reasons:
(1) the old code checked the wrong operations (e.g. checked noexceptness of `==`,
but the code that ran used `!=`), and (2) the conversion of value_type to char
could still throw, or inspect the contents of self.
The new code is much simpler, although still much more complicated than it
really could be. We'll likely revisit this codepath at some point, but for now
this patch suffices to get it passing all the new regression tests.
The added tests all fail before this patch, and succeed afterward.
See https://quuxplusone.github.io/blog/2021/04/17/pathological-string-appends/
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98573
This allows us to turn -Wdeprecated-copy back on. We turned it off
in 3b71de41cc because Clang's implementation became more stringent
and started diagnosing the old code here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101183
During the review of D97115 it was mentioned adding the `<utility>`
header for `__to_underlying` was a bit unfortunate. Nowadays we tend to
implement smaller headers, so a good reason to move `std::to_underlying`
to its own header and adjust `<charconv>` to use the new header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101233
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100073.
Reviewed By: ldionne, zoecarver, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100080
This nasty patch rewrites the tuple constructors to match those defined
by the Standard. We were previously providing several extensions in those
constructors - those extensions are removed by this patch.
The issue with those extensions is that we've had numerous bugs filed
against us over the years for problems essentially caused by them. As a
result, people are unable to use tuple in ways that are blessed by the
Standard, all that for the perceived benefit of providing them extensions
that they never asked for.
Since this is an API break, I communicated it in the release notes.
I do not foresee major issues with this break because I don't think the
extensions are too widely relied upon, but we can ship it and see if we
get complaints before the next LLVM release - that will give us some
amount of information regarding how much use these extensions have.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523
That was originally committed in 04733181b5 and then reverted in
a9f11cc0d9 because it broke several people.
The problem was a missing include of __iterator/concepts.h, which has now
been fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D99873.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal
Depends on D99855.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99863
Based on D100682 and D99855.
(Note: I originally was going to just make this part of D99855, but I decided not to because this patch moves lots of unrelated code around, and I didn't want to make D99855 harder to review because of unrelated code-changes/moves.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100686
* adds `iterator_traits` specialisation that supports all expected
member aliases except for `pointer`
* adds `iterator_traits` specialisations for iterators that meet the
legacy iterator requirements but might lack multiple member aliases
* makes pointer `iterator_traits` specialisation require objects
Depends on D99854.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99855
Previously the decision of which library to try to autolink was
based on _DLL, however the _DLL define (which is set by the compiler)
is tied to whether using a dynamically linked CRT or not, and the choice
of dynamic or static CRT is entirely orthogonal to whether libc++ is
linked dynamically or statically.
If _LIBCPP_DISABLE_VISIBILITY_ANNOTATIONS isn't defined, then all
declarations are decorated with dllimport, and there's no doubt that
the DLL version of the library is what must be linked.
_LIBCPP_DISABLE_VISIBILITY_ANNOTATIONS is defined if building with
LIBCXX_ENABLE_SHARED disabled, and thus the static library is what
should be linked.
If defining _LIBCPP_DISABLE_VISIBILITY_ANNOTATIONS manually but wanting
to link against the DLL version of the library, that's not a canonical
configuration, and then it's probably reasonable to manually define
_LIBCPP_NO_AUTO_LINK too, and manually link against the desired
library.
This fixes, among other issues, running tests for the library if
built with LIBCXX_ENABLE_STATIC disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100539
Louis Dionne