This is to help moveSILowerControlFlow to before regalloc.
There are a couple of tradeoffs with this. The complete CFG
is visible to more passes, the loop body avoids an extra copy of m0,
vcc isn't required, and immediate offsets can be shrunk into s_movk_i32.
The disadvantage is the register allocator doesn't understand that
the single lane's vector is dead within the loop body, so an extra
register is used to outlive the loop block when expanding the
VGPR -> m0 loop. This also now results in worse waitcnt insertion
before the loop instead of after for pending operations at the point
of the indexing, but that should be fixed by future improvements to
cross block waitcnt insertion.
v_movreld_b32's operands are now modeled more correctly since vdst
is not a true output. This is kind of a hack to treat vdst as a
use operand. Extra checking is required in the verifier since
I can't seem to get tablegen to emit an implicit operand for a
virtual register.
llvm-svn: 275934
Summary:
Previously, constant index insertelements would be turned into SI_INDIRECT_DST,
which is bound to prevent some optimization opportunities. Worse, it mislead
the heuristic that decides whether immediates should be lowered to S_MOV_B32
or V_MOV_B32 in a way that resulted in unnecessary v_readfirstlanes.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22217
llvm-svn: 275160
There was a combine before to handle the simple copy case.
Split this into handling loads and stores separately.
We might want to change how this handles some of the vector
extloads, since this can result in large code size increases.
llvm-svn: 274394
In bidirectional scheduling this gives more stable results than just
comparing the "reason" fields of the top/bottom node because the reason
field may be higher depending on what other nodes are in the queue.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19401
llvm-svn: 273755
Summary:
This includes a hazard recognizer implementation to replace some of
the hazard handling we had during frame index elimination.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: qcolombet, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18602
llvm-svn: 268143
Mehdi Amini