This addresses a TODO to handle operations besides and. This
also starts eliminating no-op operations with a constant that
can emerge later.
llvm-svn: 281488
In bidirectional scheduling this gives more stable results than just
comparing the "reason" fields of the top/bottom node because the reason
field may be higher depending on what other nodes are in the queue.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19401
llvm-svn: 273755
Summary:
This includes a hazard recognizer implementation to replace some of
the hazard handling we had during frame index elimination.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: qcolombet, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18602
llvm-svn: 268143
Summary:
This results in higher register usage, but should make it easier for
the compiler to hide latency.
This pass is a prerequisite for some more scheduler improvements, and I
think the increase register usage with this patch is acceptable, because
when combined with the scheduler improvements, the total register usage
will decrease.
shader-db stats:
2382 shaders in 478 tests
Totals:
SGPRS: 48672 -> 49088 (0.85 %)
VGPRS: 34148 -> 34847 (2.05 %)
Code Size: 1285816 -> 1289128 (0.26 %) bytes
LDS: 28 -> 28 (0.00 %) blocks
Scratch: 492544 -> 573440 (16.42 %) bytes per wave
Max Waves: 6856 -> 6846 (-0.15 %)
Wait states: 0 -> 0 (0.00 %)
Depends on D18451
Reviewers: nhaehnle, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18452
llvm-svn: 264876
This breaks the tests that were meant for testing
64-bit inline immediates, so move those to shl where
they won't be broken up.
This should be repeated for the other related bit ops.
llvm-svn: 258095
Allow a target to do something other than search for copies
that will avoid cross register bank copies.
Implement for SI by only rewriting the most basic copies,
so it should look through anything like a subregister extract.
I'm not entirely satisified with this because it seems like
eliminating a reg_sequence that isn't fully used should work
generically for all targets without them having to override
something. However, it seems to be tricky to have a simple
implementation of this without rewriting to invalid kinds
of subregister copies on some targets.
I'm not sure if there is currently a generic way to easily check
if a subregister index would be valid for the current use.
The current set of TargetRegisterInfo::get*Class functions don't
quite behave like I would expect (e.g. getSubClassWithSubReg
returns the maximal register class rather than the minimal), so
I'm not sure how to make the generic test keep searching if
SrcRC:SrcSubReg is a valid replacement for DefRC:DefSubReg. Making
the default implementation to check for simple copies breaks
a variety of ARM and x86 tests by producing illegal subregister uses.
The ARM tests are not actually changed since it should still be using
the same sharesSameRegisterFile implementation, this just relaxes
them to not check for specific registers.
llvm-svn: 248478
Instead of always inserting a copy in case
the super register is itself a subregister,
only extract to the super reg class if this is
actually the case.
This shouldn't really change codegen, but
makes looking at the output of SIFixSGPRCopies
easier to read.
llvm-svn: 248467
Matt Arsenault