Otherwise, with recent versions of libstdc++, clang can't tell that the
atomic operations are properly aligned, and generates calls to
libatomic. (Actually, because of the use of reinterpret_cast, it wasn't
guaranteed to be aligned, but I think it ended up being aligned in
practice.)
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54790 , the part where
LLVM failed to build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123872
Updated MipsInstPrinter to print absolute hex offsets for branch instructions.
It is necessary to make the llvm-objdump output close to the gnu objdump output.
This implementation is based on the implementation for RISC-V.
OS Laboratory. Huawei Russian Research Institute. Saint-Petersburg
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123764
Similar to D119787 for PPC64.
A hidden undefined weak may change its binding to local before some
`isUndefinedWeak` code, so some `isUndefinedWeak` code needs to be changed to
`isUndefined`. The undefined non-weak case has been errored, so just using
`isUndefined` is fine.
The Linux kernel recently has a usage that a branch from 0xffff800008491ee0
references a hidden undefined weak symbol `vfio_group_set_kvm`.
It relies on the behavior that a branch to undefined weak resolving to the next
instruction, otherwise it'd see spurious relocation out of range errors.
Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1624
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123750
Follow-on to {D123276}. Now that we work with an internal
representation of compact unwind entries, we no longer need to template
our UnwindInfoSectionImpl code based on the pointer size of the target
architecture.
I've still kept the split between `UnwindInfoSectionImpl` and
`UnwindInfoSection`. I'd introduced that split in order to do type
erasure, but I think it's still useful to have in order to keep
`UnwindInfoSection`'s definition in the header file clean.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123277
Mostly for compatibility reasons with link.exe this flag
makes sure we don't write a implib - not even when /implib
is also passed, that's how link.exe works.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123591
Mostly for compatibility reasons with link.exe this flag
makes sure we don't write a implib - not even when /implib
is also passed, that's how link.exe works.
Reviewed By: mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123591
{D123302} got me looking deeper at `includeInSymtab`. I thought it was a
little odd that there were excluded (live) symbols for which
`includeInSymtab` was false; we shouldn't have so many different ways to
exclude a symbol. As such, this diff makes the `L`-prefixed-symbol
exclusion code use `includeInSymtab` too. (Note that as part of our
support for `__eh_frame`, we will also be excluding all `__eh_frame`
symbols from the symtab in a future diff.)
Another thing I noticed is that the `emitStabs` code never has to deal
with excluded symbols because `SymtabSection::finalize()` already
filters them out. As such, I've updated the comments and asserts from
{D123302} to reflect this.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123433
lib.exe by default exits successfully without writing an output
file when no inputs are passed. llvm-lib has the same behavior,
for compatibility.
This behavior interacts poorly with build systems: If a static
library target had no inputs, llvm-lib would not produce an output
file, causing ninja (or make, or a similar system) to successfully
run that step, but then re-run it on the next build.
After this patch, llvm-lib emits a warning in this case, that with
/WX can be turned into an error. That way, ninja (or make, or...)
will mark the initial build as failed.
People who don't like the warning can use /ignore:emptyoutput to
suppress it.
The warning also points out the existing flag /llvmlibempty which
forces creation of an empty .lib file (this is an extension to lib.exe).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123517
Details: The test previously expected a specific order of those symbols, which is not guaranteed (could change simply due to hashing changes, etc).
So we change it to explicitly sort the symbols before checking contents.
PR/53026
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116813
The previous implementation of UnwindInfoSection materialized
all the compact unwind entries & applied their relocations, then parsed
the resulting data to generate the final unwind info. This design had
some unfortunate conseqeuences: since relocations can only be applied
after their referents have had addresses assigned, operations that need
to happen before address assignment must contort themselves. (See
{D113582} and observe how this diff greatly simplifies it.)
Moreover, it made synthesizing new compact unwind entries awkward.
Handling PR50956 will require us to do this synthesis, and is the main
motivation behind this diff.
Previously, instead of generating a new CompactUnwindEntry directly, we
would have had to generate a ConcatInputSection with a number of
`Reloc`s that would then get "flattened" into a CompactUnwindEntry.
This diff introduces an internal representation of `CompactUnwindEntry`
(the former `CompactUnwindEntry` has been renamed to
`CompactUnwindLayout`). The new CompactUnwindEntry stores references to
its personality symbol and LSDA section directly, without the use of
`Reloc` structs.
In addition to being easier to work with, this diff also allows us to
handle unwind info whose personality symbols are located in sections
placed after the `__unwind_info`.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123276
Fixes issue 47690. The reproduction steps produced a shared object
from clang directly, and then fed the shared object back into
lld. With no regular object files, this assert was hit. I'm not sure
if we need to or should be looking for equivalent fields in shared
objects.
Using a portable format specifier avoids a "format specifies type
'unsigned long long' but the argument has type 'uint64_t' (aka 'unsigned
long') [-Werror,-Wformat]" error depending on the exact definition of
`uint64_t`.
This fixes the issue when the current line offset is actually for next range.
Maintain a current code range with current line offset and cache next file/line
offset. Update file/line offset after finishing current range.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123151
This diff is motivated by my work to add proper DWARF unwind support. As
detailed in PR50956 functions that need DWARF unwind need to have
compact unwind entries synthesized for them. These CU entries encode an
offset within `__eh_frame` that points to the corresponding DWARF FDE.
In order to encode this offset during
`UnwindInfoSectionImpl::finalize()`, we need to first assign values to
`InputSection::outSecOff` for each `__eh_frame` subsection. But
`__eh_frame` is ordered after `__unwind_info` (according to ld64 at
least), which puts us in a bit of a bind: `outSecOff` gets assigned
during finalization, but `__eh_frame` is being finalized after
`__unwind_info`.
But it occurred to me that there's no real need for most
ConcatOutputSections to be finalized sequentially. It's only necessary
for text-containing ConcatOutputSections that may contain branch relocs
which may need thunks. ConcatOutputSections containing other types of
data can be finalized in any order.
This diff moves the finalization logic for non-text sections into a
separate `finalizeContents()` method. This method is called before
section address assignment & unwind info finalization takes place. In
theory we could call these `finalizeContents()` methods in parallel, but
in practice it seems to be faster to do it all on the main thread.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123279
This reverts commit 764cd491b1, which I
incorrectly assumed NFC partly because there were no test coverage for the
non-relocatable non-emit-relocs case before 9d6d936243fe343abe89323a27c7241b395af541.
The interaction of {,-r,--emit-relocs} {,--discard-locals} {,--gc-sections} is
complex but without -r/--emit-relocs, --gc-sections does need to discard .L
symbols like --no-gc-sections. The behavior matches GNU ld.
I was wondering if SymtabSection::emitStabs() should check
defined->includeInSymtab. Add asserts and comments explaining why that's not
necessary.
No behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123302
{D118797} means that we can now check the name/segname of a given
section directly, instead of having to look those properties up on one
of its subsections. This allows us to simplify our code.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123275
Our compact unwind handling code currently has some logic to locate a
symbol at a given offset in an InputSection. The EH frame code will need
to do something similar, so let's factor out the code.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123301
This matches ld64, and makes dsymutil work better with lld's output.
Fixes PR54783, see there for details.
Reduces time needed to run dsymutil on Chromium Framework from 8m30s
(which is already down from 26 min with D123218) to 6m30s and removes
many lines of "could not find object file symbol for symbol" from dsymutil output
(previously: several MB of those messages, now dsymutil is completely silent).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123252
This removes options for performing LTO with the legacy pass
manager in LLD. Options that explicitly enable the new pass manager
are retained as no-ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123219
Follow-up from 98bc304e9f - while that
commit fixed when you had two PDBs colliding on the same Guid it didn't
fix the case where you had more than two PDBs using the same Guid.
This commit fixes that and also tests much more carefully that all
the types are correct no matter the order.
Reviewed By: aganea, saudi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123185
Or rather, error out if it is set to something other than ON. This
removes the ability to enable the legacy pass manager by default,
but does not remove the ability to explicitly enable it through
various flags like -flegacy-pass-manager or -enable-new-pm=0.
I checked, and our test suite definitely doesn't pass with
LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER=OFF anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123126
Add void casts to mark the variables used, next to the places where
they are used in assert or `LLVM_DEBUG()` expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123117
Returning `std::array<uint8_t, N>` is better ergonomics for the hashing functions usage, instead of a `StringRef`:
* When returning `StringRef`, client code is "jumping through hoops" to do string manipulations instead of dealing with fixed array of bytes directly, which is more natural
* Returning `std::array<uint8_t, N>` avoids the need for the hasher classes to keep a field just for the purpose of wrapping it and returning it as a `StringRef`
As part of this patch also:
* Introduce `TruncatedBLAKE3` which is useful for using BLAKE3 as the hasher type for `HashBuilder` with non-default hash sizes.
* Make `MD5Result` inherit from `std::array<uint8_t, 16>` which improves & simplifies its API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123100
This ELF note is aarch64 and Android-specific. It specifies to the
dynamic loader that specific work should be scheduled to enable MTE
protection of stack and heap regions.
Current synthesis of the ".note.android.memtag" ELF note is done in the
Android build system. We'd like to move that to the compiler. This patch
adds the --memtag-stack, --memtag-heap, and --memtag-mode={async, sync,
none} flags to the linker, which synthesises the note for us.
Future changes will add -fsanitize=memtag* flags to clang which will
pass these through to lld.
Depends on D119381.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119384
Microsoft shipped a bunch of PDB files with broken/invalid GUIDs
which lead lld to use 0xFF as the key for these files in an internal
cache. When multiple files have this key it will lead to collisions
and confused symbol lookup.
Several approaches to fix this was considered. Including making the key
the path to the PDB file, but this requires some filesystem operations
in order to normalize the file path.
Since this only happens with malformatted PDB files and we haven't
seen this before they malformatted files where shipped with visual
studio we probably shouldn't optimize for this use-case.
Instead we now just don't insert files with Guid == 0xFF into the
cache map and warn if we get collisions so similar problems can be
found in the future instead of being silent.
Discussion about the root issue and the approach to this fix can be found on Github: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54487
Reviewed By: aganea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122372
When two local symbols (think: file-scope static functions, or functions in
unnamed namespaces) with the same name in two different translation units
both needed thunks, ld64.lld previously created external thunks for both
of them. These thunks ended up with the same name, leading to a duplicate
symbol error for the thunk symbols.
Instead, give thunks for local symbols local visibility.
(Hitting this requires a jump to a local symbol from over 128 MiB away.
It's unlikely that a single .o file is 128 MiB large, but with ICF
you can end up with a situation where the local symbol is ICF'd with
a symbol in a separate translation unit. And that can introduce a
large enough jump to require a thunk.)
Fixes PR54599.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122624
D86142 introduced --fortran-common and defaulted it to true (matching GNU ld
but deviates from gold/macOS ld64). The default state was motivated by transparently
supporting some FORTRAN 77 programs (Fortran 90 deprecated common blocks).
Now I think it again. I believe we made a mistake to change the default:
* this is a weird and legacy rule, though the breakage is very small
* --fortran-common introduced complexity to parallel symbol resolution and will slow down it
* --fortran-common more likely causes issues when users mix COMMON and
STB_GLOBAL definitions (see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/48570 and
https://maskray.me/blog/2022-02-06-all-about-common-symbols).
I have seen several issues in our internal projects and Android.
On the other hand, --no-fortran-common is safer since
COMMON/STB_GLOBAL have the same semantics related to archive member extraction.
Therefore I think we should switch back, not punishing the common uage.
A platform wanting --fortran-common can implement ld.lld as a shell script
wrapper around `lld -flavor gnu --fortran-common "$@"`.
Reviewed By: ikudrin, sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122450
Two code paths may reach the EHFrame case in SectionBase::getOffset:
* .eh_frame reference
* relocation copy for --emit-relocs
The first may be used by clang_rt.crtbegin.o and GCC crtbeginT.o to get the
start address of the output .eh_frame. The relocation has an offset of 0 or
(x86-64 PC-relative leaq for clang_rt.crtbegin.o) -4. The current code just
returns `offset`, which handles this case well.
The second is related to InputSection::copyRelocations on .eh_frame (used by
--emit-relocs). .eh_frame pieces may be dropped due to GC/ICF, so we should
convert the input offset to the output offset. Use the same way as
MergeInputSection with a special case handling outSecOff==-1 for an invalid
piece (see eh-frame-marker.s).
This exposes an issue in mips64-eh-abs-reloc.s that we don't reliably
handle anyway. Just add --no-check-dynamic-relocations to paper over it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122459
addSectionSymbols suppresses the STT_SECTION symbol if the first input section
is non-SHF_MERGE synthetic. This is incorrect when the first input section is synthetic
while a non-synthetic input section exists:
* `.bss : { *(COMMON) *(.bss) }`
(abc388ed3c regressed the case because
COMMON symbols precede .bss in the absence of a linker script)
* Place a synthetic section in another section: `.data : { *(.got) *(.data) }`
For `%t/a1` in the new test emit-relocs-synthetic.s, ld.lld produces incorrect
relocations with symbol index 0.
```
0000000000000000 <_start>:
0: 8b 05 33 00 00 00 movl 51(%rip), %eax # 0x39 <bss>
0000000000000002: R_X86_64_PC32 *ABS*+0xd
6: 8b 05 1c 00 00 00 movl 28(%rip), %eax # 0x28 <common>
0000000000000008: R_X86_64_PC32 common-0x4
c: 8b 05 06 00 00 00 movl 6(%rip), %eax # 0x18
000000000000000e: R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX *ABS*+0x4
```
Fix the issue by checking every input section.
Reviewed By: ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122463
.eh_frame pieces may be dropped due to GC/ICF. When --emit-relocs adds
relocations against .eh_frame, the offsets need to be adjusted. Use the same
way as MergeInputSection with a special case handling outSecOff==-1 for an
invalid piece (see eh-frame-marker.s).
This exposes an issue in mips64-eh-abs-reloc.s that we don't reliably
handle anyway. Just add --no-check-dynamic-relocations to paper over it.
Original patch by Ayrton Muñoz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122459
CLANG_TOOLS_DIR holds the the current bin/ directory, maybe with a %(build_mode)
placeholder. It is used to add the just-built binaries to $PATH for lit tests.
In most cases it equals LLVM_TOOLS_DIR, which is used for the same purpose.
But for a standalone build of clang, CLANG_TOOLS_DIR points at the build tree
and LLVM_TOOLS_DIR points at the provided LLVM binaries.
Currently CLANG_TOOLS_DIR is set in clang/test/, clang-tools-extra/test/, and
other things always built with clang. This is a few cryptic lines of CMake in
each place. Meanwhile LLVM_TOOLS_DIR is provided by configure_site_lit_cfg().
This patch moves CLANG_TOOLS_DIR to configure_site_lit_cfg() and renames it:
- there's nothing clang-specific about the value
- it will also replace LLD_TOOLS_DIR, LLDB_TOOLS_DIR etc (not in this patch)
It also defines CURRENT_LIBS_DIR. While I removed the last usage of
CLANG_LIBS_DIR in e4cab4e24d, there are LLD_LIBS_DIR usages etc that
may be live, and I'd like to mechanically update them in a followup patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121763
Eli Friedman